Carbon footprint of food waste management options in the waste hierarchy – a Swedish case study

Food waste is a problem with economic, environmental and social implications, making it both important and complex. Previous studies have addressed food waste management options at the less prioritised end of the waste hierarchy, but information on more prioritised levels is also needed when selecting the best available waste management options. Investigating the global warming potential of different waste management options offers a limited perspective, but is still important for validating generations from the waste hierarchy in a local context. This study compared the effect on greenhouse gas emissions of different food waste management scenarios representing different levels in the waste hierarchy in the city of Uppsala, Sweden. A life cycle assessment was performed for six waste management scenarios (landfill, incineration, composting, anaerobic digestion, animal feed and donations), using five food products (bananas, grilled chicken, lettuce, beef and bread) as examples when treated as individual waste streams. For all five waste streams, the established waste hierarchy was a useful, but approximate, tool for prioritising the various options, since landfill proved to be the worst option and donation, anaerobic digestion and incineration with energy recovery the best options, for easily handle products, wet products and dry products, respectively, taking into account the GHG emissions. The greatest potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions was in the bread waste stream, since bread is an energy-rich product with a relatively low carbon footprint, increasing the possibilities for replacing fossil energy carriers. Lettuce, with its high water content, had the least potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions when the waste management method was changed. Waste valorisation measures should therefore focus on food products with the potential to replace production of goods and services, rather than on food products that are wasted in large quantities or have a high carbon footprint.

[1]  Ki-in Choi,et al.  Evaluation of environmental burdens caused by changes of food waste management systems in Seoul, Korea. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  S. N. M. Menikpura,et al.  Integrated Solid Waste Management: an approach for enhancing climate co-benefits through resource recovery , 2013 .

[3]  Alistair G.F. Gibb.  Safety, Health, and Environment , 2007 .

[4]  J. Spångberg.  Recycling plant nutrients from waste and by-products , 2014 .

[5]  C. Cederberg.  Greenhouse gas emissions from Swedish consumption of meat, milk and eggs 1990 and 2005 , 2009 .

[6]  Fredrik Wikström,et al.  A life cycle perspective on environmental effects of customer focused packaging development , 2008 .

[7]  T. Garnett.  Where are the best opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the food system (including the food chain) , 2011 .

[8]  Mattias Eriksson,et al.  Carbon footprint of supermarket food waste , 2015 .

[9]  A. Tillman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of phosphorus alternatives for Swedish agriculture , 2012 .

[10]  J. Gustavsson.  Global food losses and food waste , 2011 .

[11]  O. Schlüter,et al.  Potential and challenges of insects as an innovative source for food and feed production , 2013 .

[12]  I. Strid,et al.  VALORIZATION OF MEAT WASTE FROM RETAIL STORES , 2013 .

[13]  Sven Bernesson,et al.  Nitrogen fertiliser production based on biogas - energy input, environmental impact and land use. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[14]  Felicitas Schneider,et al.  The evolution of food donation with respect to waste prevention. , 2013, Waste management.

[15]  Fredrik Wikström,et al.  Environmental impact of packaging and food losses in a life cycle perspective: a comparative analysis of five food items , 2011 .

[16]  Mattias Eriksson,et al.  Retail Food Wastage a Case Study Approach to Quantities and Causes , 2012 .

[17]  Katia Lasaridi,et al.  Measuring waste prevention. , 2013, Waste management.

[18]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[19]  J la Cour Jansen,et al.  A life cycle approach to the management of household food waste - A Swedish full-scale case study. , 2011, Waste management.

[20]  Monia Niero,et al.  Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part I: lessons learned and perspectives. , 2014, Waste management.

[21]  Herman Nilsson,et al.  Integrating Sustainability in the Food Supply Chain : Two Measures to Reduce the Food Wastage in a Swedish Retail Store , 2013 .

[22]  Stefan Salhofer,et al.  Potentials for the prevention of municipal solid waste. , 2008, Waste management.

[23]  Monia Niero,et al.  Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part II: methodological guidance for a better practice. , 2014, Waste management.

[24]  J. Davis,et al.  Emissions of greenhouse gases from production of horticultural products : analysis of 17 products cultivated in Sweden , 2011 .

[25]  N. G. Wright,et al.  The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste , 2014 .

[26]  Per-Anders Hansson,et al.  Food losses in six Swedish retail stores: Wastage of fruit and vegetables in relation to quantities delivered , 2012 .

[27]  F. Fantozzi,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of organic waste management strategies: an Italian case study , 2015 .

[28]  Per-Anders Hansson,et al.  Waste of organic and conventional meat and dairy products—A case study from Swedish retail , 2014 .

[29]  Thomas H Christensen,et al.  Environmental evaluation of municipal waste prevention. , 2011, Waste management.

[30]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Environmental sustainability assessment of food waste valorization options , 2014 .