Toward an Ethically Founded Framework for the Use of Mobile Phone Call Detail Records in Health Research

Data derived from the plethora of networked digital devices hold great potential for public benefit. Among these, mobile phone call detail records (CDRs) present novel opportunities for research and are being used in a variety of health geography studies. Research suggests that the public is amenable to the use of anonymized CDRs for research; however, further work is needed to show that such data can be used appropriately. This study works toward an ethically founded data governance framework with social acceptability. Using a multifaceted approach, this study draws upon data governance arrangements in published health research using CDRs, with a consideration of public views and the public’s information expectations from mobile network operators, and data use scenarios of CDRs in health research. The findings were considered against a backdrop of legislative and regulatory requirements. CDRs can be used at various levels of data and geographic granularity and may be integrated with additional, publicly available or restricted datasets. As such, there may be a significant risk of identity disclosure, which must be mitigated with proportionate control measures. An indicative relative risk of the disclosure model is proposed to aid this process. Subsequently, a set of recommendations is presented, including the need for greater transparency, accountability, and incorporation of public views for social acceptability. This study addresses the need for greater clarity and consistency in data governance for CDRs in health research. While recognizing the need to protect commercial interests, we propose that these recommendations be used to contribute toward an ethically founded practical framework to promote the safe, socially acceptable use of CDR data for public benefit. This pattern needs to be repeated for the appropriate use of new and emerging data types from other networking devices and the wider internet of things.

[1]  Paul Ohm Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization , 2009 .

[2]  David L. Smith,et al.  Travel risk, malaria importation and malaria transmission in Zanzibar , 2011, Scientific reports.

[3]  Alejo Salles,et al.  Analyzing the spread of chagas disease with mobile phone data , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[4]  Lenka Pitonakova,et al.  Rapid and Near Real-Time Assessments of Population Displacement Using Mobile Phone Data Following Disasters: The 2015 Nepal Earthquake , 2016, PLoS currents.

[5]  D. Dittrich,et al.  The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research , 2012 .

[6]  J. Gaudart,et al.  Using Mobile Phone Data to Predict the Spatial Spread of Cholera , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Adam Greenfield,et al.  Radical Technologies: The Design of Everyday Life , 2017 .

[8]  Etienne Huens,et al.  Data for Development: the D4D Challenge on Mobile Phone Data , 2012, ArXiv.

[9]  Hui Zang,et al.  Anonymization of location data does not work: a large-scale measurement study , 2011, MobiCom.

[10]  Kenth Engø-Monsen,et al.  Impact of human mobility on the emergence of dengue epidemics in Pakistan , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  K. O’Hara,et al.  The Anonymisation Decision-Making Framework , 2016 .

[12]  Mhairi Aitken,et al.  Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies , 2016, BMC medical ethics.

[13]  Sharon Heys,et al.  Challenges and Potential Opportunities of Mobile Phone Call Detail Records in Health Research: Review , 2018, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[14]  Public Views on Using Mobile Phone Call Detail Records in Health Research: Qualitative Study , 2019, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[15]  A. Bolignano,et al.  A dynamic urban air pollution population exposure assessment study using model and population density data derived by mobile phone traffic , 2016 .

[16]  Arvind Narayanan,et al.  No silver bullet: De-identification still doesn't work , 2014 .

[17]  Stéphane Bressan,et al.  Not So Unique in the Crowd: a Simple and Effective Algorithm for Anonymizing Location Data , 2014, PIR@SIGIR.