Central auditory development in children with bilateral cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVE To examine the time course of maturation of P1 latencies in infant sequential and simultaneous bilateral cochlear implant recipients. DESIGN Retrospective case series. SETTING Pediatric collaborative cochlear implant program. PATIENTS Four children who received bilateral cochlear implants prior to age 2 years. INTERVENTION Cortical auditory evoked potential was completed to determine the latency of the P1 response in 4 children with bilateral cochlear implants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Longitudinal development of the latency of the P1 cortical auditory evoked potential in children who received bilateral cochlear implants prior to age 2 years. RESULTS In 2 patients who received sequential bilateral implants, P1 latencies recorded from the first implanted ear were within normal limits after 3 to 6 months of implant use. By comparison, P1 latencies from the second implanted ear reached normal limits as early as 1 month after implant use. In 2 patients who received simultaneous bilateral implants, P1 latencies from both ears were also within normal limits in a very short time frame (ie, by 1 month poststimulation). CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest a high degree of plasticity of the central auditory pathways after early bilateral implantation. We find that P1 latencies provide a clinically useful biomarker of central auditory system development in children after cochlear implantation.

[1]  M. Devous,et al.  Preoperative Functional Assessment of Auditory Cortex in Adult Cochlear Implant Users , 2001, The Laryngoscope.

[2]  M. Dorman,et al.  Central auditory maturation and babbling development in infants with cochlear implants. , 2004, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[3]  Maike Vollmer,et al.  Plasticity in central representations in the inferior colliculus induced by chronic single- vs. two-channel electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant after neonatal deafness , 2000, Hearing Research.

[4]  M. Dorman,et al.  Minimization of cochlear implant stimulus artifact in cortical auditory evoked potentials , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Dorman,et al.  Early Cochlear Implantation in Children Allows Normal Development of Central Auditory Pathways , 2002, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[6]  M. Dorman,et al.  The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants , 2005, Hearing Research.

[7]  M. Dorman,et al.  A Sensitive Period for the Development of the Central Auditory System in Children with Cochlear Implants: Implications for Age of Implantation , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[8]  J. Müller,et al.  Speech Understanding in Quiet and Noise in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant System , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[9]  Maike Vollmer,et al.  The effects of chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation on inferior colliculus spatial representation in adult deafened cats , 2002, Hearing Research.

[10]  F. Schön,et al.  Speech Reception Thresholds Obtained in a Symmetrical Four-Loudspeaker Arrangement from Bilateral Users of MED-EL Cochlear Implants , 2002, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[11]  P. Nopp,et al.  Head Shadow, Squelch, and Summation Effects in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[12]  R. V. Hoesel.  Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. , 2004 .

[13]  M. Dorman,et al.  Rapid development of cortical auditory evoked potentials after early cochlear implantation , 2002, Neuroreport.

[14]  J. Eggermont,et al.  Maturation of Human Cortical Auditory Function: Differences Between Normal‐Hearing Children and Children with Cochlear Implants , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[15]  S. Gelfand,et al.  Apparent auditory deprivation in children: implications of monaural versus binaural amplification. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[16]  P Nopp,et al.  Sound Localization in Bilateral Users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implants , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[17]  R. Snyder,et al.  Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  Michael Dorman,et al.  P1 latency as a biomarker for central auditory development in children with hearing impairment. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[19]  Richard Van Hoesel,et al.  Sound-Direction Identification, Interaural Time Delay Discrimination, and Speech Intelligibility Advantages in Noise for a Bilateral Cochlear Implant User , 2002, Ear and hearing.