For pt.I see ibid., vol.35, no.8, p.987-1003, 1988. The numerical calculations of theorem 2 of pt.I which gives the homoclinicity condition for the non-Hamiltonian, i.e. dissipative, unperturbed case, are performed. In particular, many boundary curves which identify the homoclinic tangency and show that there exists a homoclinic orbit above the curves but no homoclinic orbit below them are obtained. Moreover, the associated Poincare maps (obtained by Runge-Kutta-Gill simulation) confirm that the homoclinicity condition predicted from these diagrams is correct. Finally, computer simulation is used to obtain the actual chaotic attractors observed from a very small external sinusoidal force. This corresponds exactly to the experimental results reported in pt.I that the chaotic phenomena observed from actual experiments in pt.I is indeed a horseshoe chaos based on a homoclinic orbit. >
[1]
S. Shankar Sastry,et al.
Dynamics of the forced Josephson junction circuit: The regions of chaos
,
1985
.
[2]
James S. Thorp,et al.
An analysis of truncated fractal growths in the stability boundaries of three-node swing equations
,
1988
.
[3]
L. Chua,et al.
Chaos: A tutorial for engineers
,
1987,
Proceedings of the IEEE.
[4]
A. Mees,et al.
Some tools for analyzing chaos
,
1987,
Proceedings of the IEEE.
[5]
F. Salam.
The Mel'nikov technique for highly dissipative systems
,
1987
.
[6]
Pravin Varaiya,et al.
Chaos and Arnold diffusion in dynamical systems
,
1983
.
[7]
L. Chua,et al.
Chaos from phase-locked loops
,
1988
.