Signal processing approach on weld data for evaluation of arc welding electrodes using probability density distributions

Abstract Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW) Process utilizes a constant current type power source with drooping characteristics. Due to complex nature of welding arc and metal transfer that occurs during welding, there is a lot of random variations in welding current and voltage which cannot be recorded directly by normal ammeter or voltmeter. However, acquisition of welding data while welding is in progress and subsequent analysis of this data can be very useful to evaluate various welding parameters (i.e. welding consumables etc.). For this purpose, high speed of data acquisition is essential. As noise level in the data will be high hence, before performing any meaningful analysis filtering of this data is also important. In the present study, a technique is proposed for the reliable acquisition of welding data to acquire all the possible variations in arc voltage while welding is in progress using a Digital Storage Oscilloscope (DSO). Various signal processing methods were used for selecting the appropriate filtering technique. Filtered data thus obtained were used to evaluate arc welding electrodes with different flux coating using probability density distributions. The results thus obtained were correlated with the images obtained using high speed camera setup. This clearly brings out the differences in the arc characteristics for welding consumables. They also indicate that the proposed technique can be developed as a tool to compare the performance of different welding electrodes.

[1]  X. Li,et al.  Parametric approach to positional fault detection in short arc welding , 2009 .

[2]  A. Sumesh,et al.  Establishing Correlation Between Current and Voltage Signatures of the Arc and Weld Defects in GMAW Process , 2017 .

[3]  Prasad K. Yarlagadda,et al.  Arc voltage behavior in GMAW-P under different drop transfer modes , 2009 .

[4]  M. V. Venkatesan,et al.  Performance analysis of arc welding parameters using self organizing maps and probability density distributions , 2016, 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Control, Measurement and Instrumentation (CMI).

[5]  C. S. Wu,et al.  Intelligent monitoring and recognition of the short-circuiting gas—metal arc welding process , 2004 .

[6]  Surjya K. Pal,et al.  Prediction of the quality of pulsed metal inert gas welding using statistical parameters of arc signals in artificial neural network , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[7]  D. Rehfeldt,et al.  Gas metal arc welding process monitoring and quality evaluation using neural networks , 2000 .

[8]  Leijun Li,et al.  Influence of Nanoscale Marble (Calcium Carbonate CaCO3) on Properties of D600R Surfacing Electrode , 2009 .

[9]  S. W. Simpson Through arc sensing in gas metal arc welding with signature images , 2008 .

[10]  WU C.S. A Fuzzy Logic System for Process Monitoring and Quality Evaluation in GMAW , 2013 .

[11]  Surjya K. Pal,et al.  Neurowavelet packet analysis based on current signature for weld joint strength prediction in pulsed metal inert gas welding process , 2008 .

[12]  Vikas Kumar,et al.  Evaluation of welding skill using probability density distributions and neural network analysis , 2018 .

[13]  Xiao Bing,et al.  Welding Arc Signal Acquisition and Analysis System Based on VC++ and MATLAB Mixed Programming , 2011, 2011 Third International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation.

[14]  S. W. Simpson Signature image stability and metal transfer in gas metal arc welding , 2008 .

[15]  Alvin M. Strauss,et al.  Statistical process control application to weld process , 1997 .

[16]  Kevin L. Moore,et al.  Modeling, calibration, and control-theoretic analysis of the GMAW process , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207).

[17]  N. Chandrasekhar,et al.  Analysis of arc welding process using Digital Storage Oscilloscope , 2016 .

[18]  S. W. Simpson Fault identification in gas metal arc welding with signature images , 2008 .

[19]  D. Rehfeldt,et al.  STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF GMAW PROCESS DISTURBANCES WITH SIGNATURE ANALYSIS THROUGH ANALYSATOR HANNOVER , 2015 .

[20]  S. W. Simpson Statistics of signature images for arc welding fault detection , 2007 .

[21]  S. W. Simpson Signature images for arc welding fault detection , 2007 .

[22]  J. Ramirez,et al.  Effect of Welding Parameters and Electrode Condition on Alloying Enrichment of Weld Metal Deposited with Coated Cellulosic Electrodes , 2010 .

[23]  Radislav Smid,et al.  Signal-to-Noise Ratio Improvement based on the Discrete Wavelet Transform in Ultrasonic Defectoscopy , 2004 .