The development of sustainable energy production methods is an important aspect in lowering the emission of greenhouse gases and exhaustion of fossil fuels. Wind energy is recognized globally as one of the most promising sustainable forms of electricity generation, but the cost of offshore wind energy does not meet the level of fossil-based energy sources. An opportunity for wind energy cost reduction is the deployment of two-bladed wind turbines at offshore locations. Two-bladed turbines save the mass and cost of one rotor blade, which allows the entire wind turbine construction to be designed lighter, and in effect leads to lower initial costs. Moreover, reduction of harmonic fatigue loads on blades and other turbine parts using Individual Pitch Control (IPC) is a way to extend the turbine lifetime. This type of control, using a feedback control structure incorporating the Multi-Blade Coordinate (MBC) transformation, is capable of mitigating the most dominant periodic loads. It is generally known that significant turbine load reductions can be achieved using IPC, however, it is unclear to what extent the MBC pitch signal is optimal in terms of load alleviations. The main goal of this thesis is to develop a self-learning feedforward IPC strategy for a state-ofthe- art two-bladed wind turbine. This IPC strategy will be compared to the conventional feedback IPC implementation. By making use of properties of the MBC transformation, implementations of yaw control by IPC in different configurations are evaluated in terms of performance and stability. As a preparation for the comparison between conventional feedback and self-learning feedforward IPC strategies, a linear control-oriented model from blade pitch angles to harmonic blade loads is identified and used throughout this work for two main purposes. The first purpose is to reveal the level of interaction between both blades, which turns out to be negligible. On the basis of this reasoning, an appropriate cost-function is implemented for optimization of the feedforward controller. The second purpose of the linear model is the simplified and faster development of the Iterative Feedback Tuning (IFT) algorithm, which is later implemented in high-fidelity non-linear wind turbine simulation software. IFT is a self-learning model-free algorithm, and is used to optimize the rotor-position dependent feedforward IPC implementation. It is shown that the self-learning algorithm succeeds in optimization of the feedforward controller at all constant wind speeds, but also in more realistic turbulent wind conditions in the above-rated region. As the feedforward controller generates a constant amplitude pitch signal for each wind speed, the amplitude of the feedforward pitch signal is gain-scheduled on exogenous load signals, in an effort to improve feedforward performance. Results show that the conventional IPC strategy is optimal in terms of load reductions in steady state wind conditions, as the IFT algorithm optimizes to the exact same pitch signal at various constant wind speeds. In turbulent wind conditions, performance results indicate that the constant amplitude feedforward controller is able to attain significant load reductions, but that the performance of the conventional feedback control method is still superior. Comparing the pitch signals of both controllers in turbulent wind conditions, reveals that the conventional method continuously changes the phase of the implemented pitch signal, which is not driven by the varying rotor speed. To see how these changing pitch periodics have an effect on the load reduction capabilities, the feedforward (rotor speed dependent) pitch signal amplitude is scheduled on exogenous signals in various ways. This scheduling shows only minor performance improvements, and it can be concluded that the frequency changes in the pitch signal imposed by MBC, help to actively mitigate periodic blade loads. Using both the azimuth and blade load measurements, the conventional IPC strategy seems to actively track and mitigate the current present blade load harmonic, and it appears to be a serious challenge to develop control strategies that can improve performance already attained by MBC.
[1]
R. D. Poshusta.
Error Analysis
,
2019,
Numerical Methods.
[2]
J. W. van Wingerden,et al.
Linear individual pitch control design for two‐bladed wind turbines
,
2015
.
[3]
Ervin Bossanyi,et al.
The Design of closed loop controllers for wind turbines
,
2000
.
[4]
Michel Gevers,et al.
Unbiased estimation of the Hessian for iterative feedback tuning (IFT)
,
2004,
2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).
[5]
Svante Gunnarsson,et al.
Iterative feedback tuning: theory and applications
,
1998
.
[6]
S. Gunnarsson,et al.
A convergent iterative restricted complexity control design scheme
,
1994,
Proceedings of 1994 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.
[7]
Ervin Bossanyi,et al.
Wind Energy Handbook
,
2001
.
[8]
Michel Verhaegen,et al.
Subspace identification of Bilinear and LPV systems for open- and closed-loop data
,
2009,
Autom..
[9]
Håkan Hjalmarsson.
Model Free Tuning of Controllers : Experience with Time-Varying Linear Systems
,
1995
.
[10]
Walter Musial,et al.
Determining equivalent damage loading for full-scale wind turbine blade fatigue tests
,
2000
.
[11]
H. Hjalmarsson.
Efficient tuning of linear multivariable controllers using iterative feedback tuning
,
1999
.
[12]
L Y Pao,et al.
Control of Wind Turbines
,
2011,
IEEE Control Systems.
[13]
M. Hoagland,et al.
Feedback Systems An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers SECOND EDITION
,
2015
.
[14]
Tae Tom Oomen,et al.
Subspace predictive repetitive control to mitigate periodic loads on large scale wind turbines
,
2014
.
[15]
Håkan Hjalmarsson,et al.
Control of nonlinear systems using iterative feedback tuning
,
1998,
Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207).
[16]
J. W. van Wingerden,et al.
Control design for a two-bladed downwind teeterless damped free-yaw wind turbine
,
2016
.
[17]
G. G. Stokes.
"J."
,
1890,
The New Yale Book of Quotations.
[18]
J. W. van Wingerden,et al.
Individual blade pitch for yaw control
,
2014
.
[19]
V. Verdult,et al.
Filtering and System Identification: A Least Squares Approach
,
2007
.
[20]
Ian Postlethwaite,et al.
Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design
,
1996
.
[21]
Jan-Willem van Wingerden,et al.
Integrated yaw design of a downwind two-bladed wind turbine
,
2015,
2015 American Control Conference (ACC).
[22]
Paul A. Fleming,et al.
Validation of Individual Pitch Control by Field Tests on Two- and Three-Bladed Wind Turbines
,
2013,
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.
[23]
G. Bir.
Multi-Blade Coordinate Transformation and its Application to Wind Turbine Analysis
,
2008
.
[24]
Fernando D. Bianchi,et al.
Wind Turbine Control Systems: Principles, Modelling and Gain Scheduling Design
,
2006
.
[25]
Jan-Willem van Wingerden,et al.
Field testing of linear individual pitch control on the two‐bladed controls advanced research turbine
,
2016
.
[26]
Michel Verhaegen,et al.
Two-Degree-of-Freedom Active Vibration Control of a Prototyped “Smart” Rotor
,
2011,
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.