Re-examining the nature of radar sea clutter

Conventionally, sea clutter has been modelled as a stochastic compound k-distribution. It was previously suggested that sea clutter was not stochastic but rather deterministic. More precisely, the system could be described as a nonlinear deterministic process, which exhibited chaotic behaviour. This issue is re-examined. It is demonstrated that the two main invariants used in the previous analysis, namely the 'maximum likelihood of the correlation dimension estimate' (DML) and the 'false nearest neighbours' (FNN) are problematic in the analysis of data from real-world systems. The DML and FNN invariants are investigated for stochastic time series. It is shown that both the invariants lead to the false detection of chaos for stochastic time series and thus are unsuitable for determining the nature of an unknown system, such as sea clutter. An alternative method using the correlation integral of Grassberger et al. is used in the paper for a variety of stochastic systems including those associated with sea clutter. Three sea clutter sets are investigated for different polarisation, channels, data length, wind speeds and for pulse-compressed and non-pulse-compressed data. It is shown that in all cases the data were better described as stochastic in nature. No evidence was found of determinism or chaos in the data.

[1]  Alfonso M Albano,et al.  Phase-randomized surrogates can produce spurious identifications of non-random structure , 1994 .

[2]  Bernie Mulgrew,et al.  Investigation into the use of nonlinear predictor networks to improve the performance of maritime surveillance radar target detectors , 2001 .

[3]  Theiler,et al.  Spurious dimension from correlation algorithms applied to limited time-series data. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[4]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[5]  Bernie Mulgrew,et al.  Improved surrogate data tests for sea clutter , 2001 .

[6]  Theo Geisel,et al.  Chaotic diffusion and 1/f-noise of particles in two-dimensional solids , 1988 .

[7]  H. Kantz,et al.  Nonlinear time series analysis , 1997 .

[8]  Rice,et al.  Method of false nearest neighbors: A cautionary note. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[9]  Grebogi,et al.  Plateau onset for correlation dimension: When does it occur? , 1993, Physical review letters.

[10]  C. Baker,et al.  Maritime surveillance radar. II. Detection performance prediction in sea clutter , 1990 .

[11]  J. Theiler.  Some Comments on the Correlation Dimension of 1/fαNoise , 1991 .

[12]  A. Provenzale,et al.  Finite correlation dimension for stochastic systems with power-law spectra , 1989 .

[13]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Measuring the Strangeness of Strange Attractors , 1983 .

[14]  James Theiler,et al.  Estimating fractal dimension , 1990 .

[15]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Detection of signals in chaos , 1995, Proc. IEEE.

[16]  S. Haykin.  Radar clutter attractor: implications for physics, signal processing and control , 1999 .

[17]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Reliable detection of nonlinearity in experimental time series with strong periodic components , 1998 .

[18]  Henry D. I. Abarbanel,et al.  Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data , 1995 .

[19]  S. Haykin,et al.  Chaotic dynamics of sea clutter. , 1999, Chaos.