A rule-based interpretation system for segmentation of seismic images

Abstract A rule-based interpretation system for segmenting seismic images based on signal character is presented in this paper. The system consists of two substructures: a texture analyzer and an intelligent interpreter. The texture analyzer adapts the “texture energy measurement” method developed by Laws to extract discriminant features from the texture-like signal image. The major function of the analyzer is to assign a vector of initial certainty factors (CFs) to each texel in the image based on the extracted feature measures. The elements of the CF vector essentially correspond to the degree of membership of the texel to each of the texture regions in the image. The intelligent interpreter, which is the rule-based system, is made up of a knowledge database, a reasoning engine and a parallel region growing controller. Whenever a growing region requests to classify one of its boundary texels, a fact list is formed carrying information about the texel and its neighborhood. The interpreter takes the fact list and searches in the knowledge database to determine if any rules can be exercised. After a sequence of executions of rules and manipulations of CF numbers, a final CF vector emerges. If this vector favors the requesting region by having its corresponding component element exceed a preset threshold, the texel is classified to this texture class and merged into the requesting region. A test run of the system on a piece of a seismic section shows that it can very successfully segment it into regions of common signal character. A noticeable advantage of the intelligent interpreter over other conventional classification techniques is its capability of patching small areas in the image for which the original data apparently do not provide enough discriminant information. An example illustrating these results on real seismic data from the Gulf of Mexico is presented.

[1]  Ernest L. Hall,et al.  Computer Image Processing and Recognition , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Marwan A. Simaan,et al.  Segmentation of a seismic section using image processing and artificial intelligence techniques , 1985, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  K. N. Khattri,et al.  Seismic indicators of stratigraphy , 1984 .

[4]  Kenneth P. Birman,et al.  Rule-Based Learning for More Accurate ECG Analysis , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Marwan A. Simaan,et al.  Automatic Recognition Of Primitive Changes In Manufacturing Process Signals , 1986, Other Conferences.

[6]  J. B. Sangree,et al.  Interpretation of depositional facies from seismic data , 1979 .

[7]  Mary M. Galloway,et al.  Texture analysis using gray level run lengths , 1974 .

[8]  Chi Hau Chen,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition. , 1973 .

[9]  Laveen N. Kanal,et al.  Degree in Electrical Engineering from Carnegie- Problem Reduction Representation for the Linguistic Analysis of Waveforms , 2022 .

[10]  J. H. Justice,et al.  Multidimensional attribute analysis and pattern recognition for seismic interpretation , 1985, Pattern Recognit..

[11]  N. Nandhakumar,et al.  The artificial intelligence approach to pattern recognition--a perspective and an overview , 1985, Pattern Recognit..

[12]  Edward A. Feigenbaum,et al.  RULE-BASED UNDERSTANDING OF SIGNALS1 , 1978 .

[13]  Edward A. Feigenbaum,et al.  Rule-based understanding of signals , 1977, SGAR.