Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention.

Prosthesis-patient mismatch is present when the effective orifice area of the inserted prosthetic valve is less than that of a normal human valve. This is a frequent problem in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, and its main hemodynamic consequence is the generation of high transvalvular gradients through normally functioning prosthetic valves. The purposes of this report are to present an update on the concept of aortic prosthesis-patient mismatch and to review the present knowledge with regard to its impact on hemodynamic status, functional capacity, morbidity and mortality. Also, we propose a simple approach for the prevention and clinical management of this phenomenon because it can be largely avoided if certain simple factors are taken into consideration before the operation.

[1]  W. Weidman Second natural history study of congenital heart defects. , 1993, Circulation.

[2]  E. Sowton,et al.  Echocardiographic description of the CarboMedics bileaflet prosthetic heart valve. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  S. Rahimtoola,et al.  Effects of successful, uncomplicated valve replacement on ventricular hypertrophy, volume, and performance in aortic stenosis and in aortic incompetence. , 1978, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Aortic valve replacement with stentless xenografts. , 1992, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[5]  K. Yun,et al.  Aortic valve replacement with the freestyle stentless bioprosthesis: five-year experience. , 1999, Circulation.

[6]  W. Jamieson,et al.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: hemodynamic comparison of stented and stentless aortic valves. , 1999, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  L. Cohn,et al.  Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. , 1988, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  N. Oldridge,et al.  Time course of recovery during cardiac rehabilitation. , 1995, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.

[9]  T. Iwasaka,et al.  Doppler echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic aortic valve function. Findings in normal valves. , 1991, Chest.

[10]  S. Fremes,et al.  Initial clinical experience with the Toronto Stentless Porcine Valve. , 1994, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[11]  D. Gibson,et al.  Diastolic mechanisms of impaired exercise tolerance in aortic valve disease. , 1983, British heart journal.

[12]  S. Armstrong,et al.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Affects Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement , 2000, Circulation.

[13]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. , 1998, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[14]  R. Devereux,et al.  Left ventricular hypertrophy and geometric remodeling in hypertension: stimuli, functional consequences and prognostic implications. , 1994, Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension.

[15]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Changes in left ventricular mass and function after aortic valve replacement: a comparison between stentless and stented bioprosthetic valves. , 1999, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[16]  O Geiran,et al.  Hemodynamic evaluation of the CarboMedics prosthetic heart valve in the aortic position: comparison of noninvasive and invasive techniques. , 1992, American heart journal.

[17]  G. Musumeci,et al.  Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with 21mm St. Jude Medical aortic prosthesis. , 1999, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[18]  B. Maron,et al.  Outer limits of the athlete's heart, the effect of gender, and relevance to the differential diagnosis with primary cardiac diseases. , 1997, Cardiology clinics.

[19]  E. Sowton,et al.  The continuity equation tested in a bileaflet aortic prosthesis. , 1991, International journal of cardiology.

[20]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Effect of prosthetic aortic valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: an in vitro study of normal St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valves. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  J. Lusson,et al.  Adaptation of the left ventricular function parameters to dynamic exercise in aortic stenosis. , 1988, European heart journal.

[22]  J E Okies,et al.  Serial follow-up of an experimental bovine pericardial aortic bioprosthesis. Usefulness of pulsed Doppler echocardiography. , 1991, Circulation.

[23]  Metabolism in Health and in Disease , 1907, The Hospital.

[24]  S. Sire Physical training and occupational rehabilitation after aortic valve replacement. , 1987, European heart journal.

[25]  김재현,et al.  인공심장판막에 대한 재치환술 , 1998 .

[26]  R. Woodruff,et al.  Rest and exercise evaluation of St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall prostheses. Influence of primary lesion, valvular type, valvular size, and left ventricular function. , 1989, Circulation.

[27]  G. Laub,et al.  Predictive value of prosthetic valve area index for early and late clinical results after valve replacement with the St Jude Medical valve prosthesis. , 1996, Circulation.

[28]  R. O'rourke,et al.  Use of dobutamine stress echocardiography in assessing mechanical aortic prostheses: comparison with exercise echocardiography. , 1997, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[29]  S. Westaby Stentless aortic bioprostheses , 1998 .

[30]  F. Mohr,et al.  Prospectively randomized evaluation of stentless versus conventional biological aortic valves: impact on early regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. , 1999, Circulation.

[31]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients. , 1992, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[32]  M. Eriksson,et al.  Rest and exercise hemodynamics of an extended stentless aortic bioprosthesis. , 1997, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[33]  S. Colan,et al.  Second natural history study of congenital heart defects. Pulmonary stenosis: echocardiography. , 1993, Circulation.

[34]  Y. Kawashima,et al.  Prediction of postoperative exercise tolerance after aortic valve replacement. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[35]  E. Blackstone,et al.  Death and other time-related events after valve replacement. , 1985, Circulation.

[36]  L. Bonchek,et al.  Accuracy of sizers for aortic valve prostheses. , 1987, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[37]  G Maurer,et al.  "Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[38]  A. Pasquè,et al.  Posterior enlargement of the small annulus during aortic valve replacement versus implantation of a small prosthesis. , 1984, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[39]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[40]  G. Thiene,et al.  Early and late outcome after reoperation for prosthetic valve dysfunction: analysis of 549 patients during a 26-year period. , 1994, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[41]  S. Rahimtoola,et al.  Perspective on valvular heart disease: an update. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[42]  R. Frye,et al.  Determinants of survival and recovery of left ventricular function after aortic valve replacement. , 1993, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[43]  C. Sintek,et al.  Stentless porcine aortic root: valve of choice for the elderly patient with small aortic root? , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[44]  T. David,et al.  Aortic valve replacement with the Toronto SPV bioprosthesis. , 1992, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[45]  J Ross,et al.  Normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function as assessed by Doppler echocardiography. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[46]  T. David,et al.  Aortic valve replacement with a stentless porcine aortic valve. A six-year experience. , 1994, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[47]  T. David,et al.  Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. , 1990, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[48]  C. Knott-Craig,et al.  Pulmonary Autograft Replacement of the Aortic Valve: An Evolution of Technique , 1992, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[49]  L. Cohn,et al.  Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. , 1996, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[50]  D N Ross,et al.  Homograft replacement of the aortic valve. , 1967, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[51]  D. McGiffin,et al.  Allograft Aortic Valve Replacement: Long‐Term Comparative Clinical Analysis of the Viable Cryopreserved and Antibiotic 4°C Stored Valves , 1991, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[52]  N. Kouchoukos,et al.  Replacement of the aortic root with a pulmonary autograft in children and young adults with aortic-valve disease. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[53]  S. Fremes,et al.  Initial Clinical Experience with the Toronto Stentless Porcine ValveTM , 1994 .

[54]  T. David,et al.  Hemodynamic benefits of the Toronto Stentless Valve. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[55]  S. Westaby Pulmonary autograft replacement of the aortic valve. , 1995, British heart journal.

[56]  W. Konertz,et al.  Hemodynamic performance of the PRIMA Edwards stentless aortic xenograft: early results of a multicenter clinical trial. , 1996, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[57]  C Giusti,et al.  Ultrasonic videodensitometric analysis of two different models of left ventricular hypertrophy. Athlete's heart and hypertension. , 1997, Hypertension.

[58]  W. Kühnel,et al.  Electron-microscopic findings after transmyocardial laser revascularization in an acute ischemic pig model. , 1998, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[59]  D. Mirvis,et al.  Left ventricular hypertrophy: effect on survival. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[60]  G. Poletti,et al.  Reoperations on heart valve prostheses: an analysis of operative risks and late results. , 1990, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[61]  K. Bachmann,et al.  Limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of prosthetic valve hemodynamics. , 1995, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[62]  T. Bowen,et al.  Hemodynamic evaluation of the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis in the small aortic anulus. , 1981, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[63]  G. Pettersson,et al.  Expanding indications for the Ross operation. , 1995, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[64]  L. Hatle,et al.  Exercise hemodynamics in small (< or = 21 mm) aortic valve prostheses assessed by Doppler echocardiography. , 1993, American heart journal.

[65]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) , 1998 .

[66]  U Althaus,et al.  Early experience with the new Masters series of St. Jude Medical heart valve: in vivo hemodynamic and clinical results in patients with narrowed aortic annulus. , 1997, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[67]  D N Ross,et al.  Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. , 1967, Lancet.

[68]  D. Levy,et al.  Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[69]  H. Rakowski,et al.  Clinical and Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of bioprosthetic valve failure after 10 years. , 1990, Circulation.

[70]  P. Vandervoort,et al.  Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses. Localized high velocities and gradients in central and side orifices with implications for Doppler-catheter gradient relation in aortic and mitral position. , 1995, Circulation.

[71]  H. Schaff,et al.  Influence of prosthesis size on change in left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement. , 1994, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[72]  B. Lorell,et al.  Left ventricular hypertrophy: pathogenesis, detection, and prognosis. , 2000, Circulation.

[73]  M. Turina,et al.  Early in vivo experience with the Hemodynamic Plus St. Jude Medical heart valves in patients with narrowed aortic annulus. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[74]  T. David,et al.  Aortic valve replacement in adult patients with small aortic annuli. , 1983, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[75]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  Bileaflet, tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[76]  O. Hess,et al.  Left ventricular myocardial structure in aortic valve disease before, intermediate, and late after aortic valve replacement. , 1989, Circulation.

[77]  J. Dumesnil,et al.  Hemodynamic features of the freestyle aortic bioprosthesis compared with stented bioprosthesis. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[78]  J. Copeland,et al.  New technique for improving hemostasis in aortic root replacement with composite graft. , 1993, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[79]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Usefulness of the indexed effective orifice area at rest in predicting an increase in gradient during maximum exercise in patients with a bioprosthesis in the aortic valve position. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[80]  D G Gibson,et al.  Effects of valve substitute on changes in left ventricular function and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[81]  F. Tomai,et al.  Hemodynamic performances of small diameter carbomedics and St. Jude valves. , 1996, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[82]  S. Westaby,et al.  Stentless aortic bioprostheses: compelling data from the Second International Symposium. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[83]  H. Rakowski,et al.  Aortic valve replacement with a small prosthesis. , 1987, Circulation.

[84]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. , 1996, Circulation.

[85]  J. Pepper,et al.  Clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards supraannular aortic valve. , 1992, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[86]  S L Schwartz,et al.  Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis. , 1993, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[87]  A. Abdoh,et al.  Clinical and Hemodynamic Comparison of the Medtronic Freestyle and Toronto SPV Stentless Valves , 1998, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[88]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  In vitro fluid dynamic characteristics of Ionescu-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards tissue bioprostheses. , 1983, Artificial organs.

[89]  J. González-Juanatey,et al.  Influence of the size of aortic valve prostheses on hemodynamics and change in left ventricular mass: implications for the surgical management of aortic stenosis. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[90]  F. Tomai,et al.  Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the CarboMedics valve in patients with small aortic anulus and valve prosthesis-body surface area mismatch. , 1994, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[91]  S. Nitter‐Hauge,et al.  Prognostic factors in aortic valve replacement associated with narrow aortic roots. An analysis using the proportional hazard model. , 1986, Scandinavian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[92]  A. J. Dunning,et al.  Value of exercise Doppler echocardiography in patients with prosthetic or bioprosthetic cardiac valves. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[93]  M Jones,et al.  In vitro hemodynamic characteristics of tissue bioprostheses in the aortic position. , 1986, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[94]  H. Matsuda,et al.  An appraisal of patch enlargement of the small aortic annulus in 33 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. , 1992, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[95]  J. Dumesnil,et al.  Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[96]  J. Vanoverschelde,et al.  Aortic valve replacement with allograft/autograft: subcoronary versus intraluminal cylinder or root. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[97]  C. Peniston,et al.  Medtronic mosaic porcine bioprosthesis satisfactory early clinical performance. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[98]  D. Mancini,et al.  The mechanism of extertional fatigue in heart failure. , 1990, Cardioscience.

[99]  S. Armstrong,et al.  Clinical and hemodynamic assessment of the Hancock II bioprosthesis. , 1992, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[100]  P. Pibarot,et al.  The effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status. , 1996, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[101]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Patients at risk for cardiac death late after aortic valve replacement. , 1990, American heart journal.

[102]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity: A new index based on the energy loss concept. , 2000, Circulation.

[103]  A. Zanchetti,et al.  Physiological Versus Pathological Hypertrophy , 1997 .

[104]  M. Eriksson,et al.  Effects of exercise on Doppler-derived pressure difference, valve resistance, and effective orifice area in different aortic valve prostheses of similar size. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[105]  A. Moritz,et al.  The CarboMedics®“Top Hat” Supraannular Prosthesis in the Small Aortic Root , 1995, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[106]  J. Chambers,et al.  Doppler echocardiography in normally functioning replacement heart valves: a literature review. , 1995, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[107]  William A. Zoghbi,et al.  Doppler Echocardiographic Assessment of the St. Jude Medical Prosthetic Valve in the Aortic Position Using the Continuity Equation , 1991, Circulation.

[108]  J. Neutze,et al.  Rest and exercise hemodynamics of 20 to 23 mm allograft, Medtronic Intact (porcine), and St. Jude Medical valves in the aortic position. , 1990, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[109]  J. Dumesnil,et al.  Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[110]  J. Stoker,et al.  Physical training after heart valve replacement. , 1980, British heart journal.

[111]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Valve orifice area alone is an insufficient index of aortic stenosis severity: effects of the proximal and distal geometry on transaortic energy loss. , 1999, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[112]  J. Bonnar,et al.  Letter: Subcutaneous heparin. , 1974, Lancet.

[113]  L. Hatle,et al.  Hemodynamic evaluation by Doppler echocardiography of small (≤21 mm) prostheses and bioprostheses in the aortic valve position , 1992 .

[114]  A. Banning,et al.  Time-related hemodynamic changes after aortic replacement with the freestyle stentless xenograft. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[115]  S. Westaby,et al.  Aortic valve replacement with the freestyle stentless xenograft. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[116]  Flow Dependence of Measures of Aortic Stenosis Severity During Exercise , 1995 .

[117]  S. Rahimtoola,et al.  The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. , 1978, Circulation.

[118]  I. Birdi,et al.  Comparison of hemodynamic performances of St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics 21 mm aortic prostheses by means of dobutamine stress echocardiography. , 1996, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[119]  F. Crawford,et al.  The risk of small St. Jude aortic valve prostheses. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[120]  M. Mariani,et al.  Rest and exercise hemodynamics of stentless porcine bioprostheses in aortic position. , 1994, Cardiologia.

[121]  A. Labovitz,et al.  Prosthetic Valves for the Small Aortic Root , 1994, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[122]  T. David,et al.  Changing pattern of valve surgery. , 1996, Circulation.

[123]  G Maurer,et al.  Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro. A manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery. , 1990, Circulation.

[124]  F. Mohr,et al.  The Toronto SPV bioprosthesis: one-year results in 100 patients. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[125]  K. Kunzelman,et al.  Discrepancies Between Labeled and Actual Dimensions of Prosthetic Valves and Sizers , 1996, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[126]  R. Elkins Pulmonary autograft--the optimal substitute for the aortic valve? , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.