Spectral Unmixing for the Classification of Hyperspectral Images at a Finer Spatial Resolution

The problem of classification of hyperspectral images containing mixed pixels is addressed. Hyperspectral imaging is a continuously growing area of remote sensing applications. The wide spectral range of such imagery, providing a very high spectral resolution, allows to detect and classify surfaces and chemical elements of the observed image. The main problem of hyperspectral data is the (relatively) low spatial resolution, which can vary from a few to tens of meters. Many factors make the spatial resolution one of the most expensive and hardest to improve in imaging systems. For classification, the major problem caused by low spatial resolution are the mixed pixels, i.e., parts of the image where more than one land cover map lie in the same pixel. In this paper, we propose a method to address the problem of mixed pixels and to obtain a finer spatial resolution of the land cover classification maps. The method exploits the advantages of both soft classification techniques and spectral unmixing algorithms, in order to determine the fractional abundances of the classes at a sub-pixel scale. Spatial regularization by simulated annealing is finally performed to spatially locate the obtained classes. Experiments carried out on synthetic real data sets show excellent results both from a qualitative and quantitative point of view.

[1]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[2]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Advances in Large Margin Classifiers , 2000 .

[3]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[4]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Segmentation and Classification of Hyperspectral Images Using Minimum Spanning Forest Grown From Automatically Selected Markers , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[5]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  Signal Theory Methods in Multispectral Remote Sensing , 2003 .

[6]  Alfonso Fernández-Manso,et al.  Spectral unmixing , 2012 .

[7]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines , 2002, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[8]  Etienne Kerre,et al.  Soft computing in image processing , 2007 .

[9]  Lieven Verbeke,et al.  Sub-pixel mapping: a comparison of techniques. , 2006 .

[10]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Abundance Estimation of Spectrally Similar Minerals by Using Derivative Spectra in Simulated Annealing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  A new approach to mixed pixel classification of hyperspectral imagery based on extended morphological profiles , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[12]  Huong T. X. Doan,et al.  Variability in Soft Classification Prediction and its implications for Sub-pixel Scale Change Detection and Super Resolution Mapping , 2007 .

[13]  Sankar K. Pal,et al.  Soft Computing for Image Processing , 2000 .

[14]  Xiuping Jia,et al.  Integration of Soft and Hard Classifications Using Extended Support Vector Machines , 2009, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[15]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[16]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Hsuan-Tien Lin,et al.  A note on Platt’s probabilistic outputs for support vector machines , 2007, Machine Learning.

[18]  John Platt,et al.  Probabilistic Outputs for Support vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods , 1999 .

[19]  A. Cracknell Review article Synergy in remote sensing-what's in a pixel? , 1998 .

[20]  Zenon Kulpa More about areas and perimeters of quantized objects , 1983, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[21]  Jiang Li,et al.  Correction to "Wavelet-Based Feature Extraction for Improved Endmember Abundance Estimation in Linear Unmixing of Hyperspectral Signals" , 2004 .

[22]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[23]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Spectral and spatial classification of hyperspectral data using SVMs and morphological profiles , 2008, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[24]  S. Macenka,et al.  Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) , 1988 .

[25]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Kernel methods for remote sensing data analysis , 2009 .

[26]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[27]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Decision Fusion for the Classification of Hyperspectral Data: Outcome of the 2008 GRS-S Data Fusion Contest , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[28]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  A quantitative and comparative analysis of endmember extraction algorithms from hyperspectral data , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  Robert F. Cromp,et al.  Support Vector Machine Classifiers as Applied to AVIRIS Data , 1999 .

[30]  Luis Samaniego,et al.  Fuzzy rule-based classification of remotely sensed imagery , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[31]  Amandine Robin,et al.  Unsupervised Subpixelic Classification Using Coarse-Resolution Time Series and Structural Information , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[32]  M. F. Worboys,et al.  Innovations In GIS , 1994 .

[33]  S. J. Sutley,et al.  USGS Digital Spectral Library splib06a , 2007 .

[34]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[35]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Optical Remote Sensing: Advances in Signal Processing and Exploitation Techniques , 2011 .

[36]  Zarine P. Kemp,et al.  Innovations in GIS 4 , 1997 .