Seascape architecture – incorporating ecological considerations in design of coastal and marine infrastructure

Abstract With nearly 60% of the human population concentrated around the coastlines, alongside growing threats from sea level rise and increased storminess, accelerated coastal development is inevitable. As most marine flora and fauna reside in coastal areas, anthropogenic changes to coastlines are a key reason for loss of coastal habitats, and associated ecosystem services. While coastal infrastructure such as seawalls or breakwaters add significant amounts of hard substrate for marine organisms, they do not support similar species assemblages to those of natural habitats. This is mainly due to design features related to steep slopes, low structural complexity, and high homogeneity, all of which are rarely found in natural habitats. This study provides an example for seascape architecture of coastal structures using ecologically sensitive designs and concrete technologies that enhance the structures’ biological and ecological value while contributing to structural integrity. Four 1.5 mx0.8 m seawall panels made of bio-enhancing concrete with high structural complexity were deployed in an active marina (Herzliya, Israel). The panels, spanned from the Mean High Higher Water (MHHW) down to the sublittoral zone, were surveyed 2, 7, 12, 18 and 22 months post deployment using 0.3 × 0.3 m quadrats in both intertidal and sublittoral zones of each panel. Bio-enhanced panels were compared to fixed control quadrats comprised of scraped sections of the original concrete marina seawall. Results demonstrated the effectiveness of applying ecological considerations for biological and ecological enhancement of active infrastructure. All community parameters examined (live cover, richness, biodiversity) were significantly higher on bio-enhanced panels compared to controls. Moreover, mobile invertebrates and resident fish species were clearly enhanced through design aspects (holes and crevices) of the bio-enhanced panels. The study provides an example of an emerging approach of assimilating ecological considerations into the design and construction of working waterfronts and active coastal infrastructure, thus reducing their ecological footprint without compromising their operational performance.

[1]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Between a rock and a hard place: Environmental and engineering considerations when designing coastal defence structures , 2014 .

[2]  L. Mullineaux,et al.  Recruitment of encrusting benthic invertebrates in boundary-layer flows: A deep-water experiment on Cross Seamount , 1990 .

[3]  H. Viles,et al.  Cool barnacles: Do common biogenic structures enhance or retard rates of deterioration of intertidal rocks and concrete? , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Y. Kawabata,et al.  Enhanced Long-Term Resistance of Concrete with Marine Sessile Organisms to Chloride Ion Penetration , 2012 .

[5]  J. Lawton,et al.  Organisms as ecosystem engineers , 1994 .

[6]  B. Chan,et al.  Variations in intertidal assemblages and zonation patterns between vertical artificial seawalls and natural rocky shores: a case study from Victoria Harbour, Hong Kong. , 2009 .

[7]  Katherine A Dafforn,et al.  Application of management tools to integrate ecological principles with the design of marine infrastructure. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  S. Ostroumov.  Some aspects of water filtering activity of filter-feeders , 2005, Hydrobiologia.

[9]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Getting into the groove: Opportunities to enhance the ecological value of hard coastal infrastructure using fine-scale surface textures , 2015 .

[10]  Shimrit Perkol-Finkel,et al.  Corridors for aliens but not for natives: effects of marine urban sprawl at a regional scale , 2015 .

[11]  Gil Rilov,et al.  Marine Bioinvasions in the Mediterranean Sea – History, Distribution and Ecology , 2009 .

[12]  Y. Loya,et al.  Non-indigenous ascidians (Chordata: Tunicata) along the Mediterranean coast of Israel , 2009 .

[13]  M. Chapman,et al.  Mitigating against the loss of species by adding artificial intertidal pools to existing seawalls , 2014 .

[14]  Elizabeth Cook,et al.  Changing coasts: marine aliens and artificial structures , 2012 .

[15]  Hiroko Watanabe,et al.  Can Marine Fouling Organisms Extend the Life of Concrete Structures , 2002 .

[16]  R. Simpson.  Physical and biotic factors limiting the distribution and abundance of littoral molluscs on Macquarje Island (sub-Antarctic) , 1976 .

[17]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Enhancing stocks of the exploited limpet Patella candei d’Orbigny via modifications in coastal engineering , 2010 .

[18]  J. S. Zaneveld.  Factors Controlling the Delimitation of Littoral Benthic Marine Algal Zonation , 1969 .

[19]  Jon David Risinger,et al.  Biologically dominated engineered coastal breakwaters , 2012 .

[20]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Facing the future: the importance of substratum features for ecological engineering of artificial habitats in the rocky intertidal , 2016 .

[21]  J. Lawton,et al.  POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF ORGANISMS AS PHYSICAL ECOSYSTEM ENGINEERS , 1997 .

[22]  Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi,et al.  Hard coastal-defence structures as habitats for native and exotic rocky-bottom species. , 2008, Marine environmental research.

[23]  Sella Ido,et al.  Blue is the new green – Ecological enhancement of concrete based coastal and marine infrastructure , 2015 .

[24]  Jennifer L. Molnar,et al.  Marine Ecoregions of the World: A Bioregionalization of Coastal and Shelf Areas , 2007 .

[25]  S. Degnan,et al.  Articulated Coralline Algae of the Genus Amphiroa Are Highly Effective Natural Inducers of Settlement in the Tropical Abalone Haliotis asinina , 2008, The Biological Bulletin.

[26]  Laura Airoldi,et al.  Marine urbanization: an ecological framework for designing multifunctional artificial structures , 2015 .

[27]  Ana S. Gomes,et al.  Integrated assessment of bioerosion, biocover and downwearing rates of carbonate rock shore platforms in southern Portugal , 2012 .

[28]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Partial replacement of cement for waste aggregates in concrete coastal and marine infrastructure: A foundation for ecological enhancement? , 2017, Ecological Engineering.

[29]  L. Fishelson.  Marine animal assemblages along the littoral of the Israeli Mediterranean seashore: The Red‐Mediterranean Seas communities of species , 2000 .

[30]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Bioprotection and disturbance: Seaweed, microclimatic stability and conditions for mechanical weathering in the intertidal zone , 2013 .

[31]  S. Beer,et al.  Ecophysiological adaptation strategies of some intertidal marine macroalgae of the Israeli Mediterranean coast , 1995 .

[32]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Facilitating ecological enhancement of coastal infrastructure: The role of policy, people and planning , 2012 .

[33]  Laura Airoldi,et al.  Estuarine and coastal structures: environmental effects, a focus on shore and nearshore structures , 2011 .

[34]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[35]  D. Wethey,et al.  Settlement and early post-settlement survival of sessile marine invertebrates on topographically complex surfaces: the importance of refuge dimensions and adult morphology , 1996 .

[36]  Chad L. Hewitt,et al.  Nonindigenous biota on artificial structures: could habitat creation facilitate biological invasions? , 2007 .

[37]  Shimrit Perkol-Finkel,et al.  Floating and fixed artificial habitats: Spatial and temporal patterns of benthic communities in a coral reef environment , 2008 .

[38]  J. E. Byers,et al.  Do artificial substrates favor nonindigenous fouling species over native species , 2007 .

[39]  Fabio Bulleri,et al.  The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine environments , 2010 .

[40]  L. Airoldi,et al.  Loss, status and trends for coastal marine habitats of Europe , 2007 .

[41]  Nicholas J. Bax,et al.  Marine invasive alien species: a threat to global biodiversity , 2003 .

[42]  P. Todd,et al.  Structural complexity and component type increase intertidal biodiversity independently of area. , 2016, Ecology.

[43]  M. Mayer-Pinto,et al.  Building 'blue': An eco-engineering framework for foreshore developments. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[44]  Jeffery R. Cordell,et al.  Ecological response and physical stability of habitat enhancements along an urban armored shoreline , 2013 .

[45]  L. Chou,et al.  Can artificial substrates enriched with crustose coralline algae enhance larval settlement and recruitment in the fluted giant clam (Tridacna squamosa)? , 2009, Hydrobiologia.

[46]  Shimrit Perkol-Finkel,et al.  Harnessing urban coastal infrastructure for ecological enhancement , 2015 .