Tailored risk notification for women with a family history of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND Evidence indicates that although first-degree relatives of breast cancer cases are at increased risk of developing the disease themselves, they may be underutilizing screening mammography. Therefore, interventions to increase the use of mammography in this group are urgently needed. METHODS A randomized two-group design was used to evaluate an intervention to increase mammography use among women (N = 901) with at least one first-degree relative with breast cancer. A statewide cancer registry was used to obtain a random sample of breast cancer cases who identified eligible relatives. The mailed intervention consisted of personalized risk notification and other theoretically driven materials tailored for high-risk women. RESULTS An overall significant intervention effect was observed (8% intervention group advantage) in mammography at post-test. There was an interaction of the intervention with age such that there was no effect among women <50 years of age and a fairly large (20% advantage) effect among women 50+ and 65+. Health insurance, education, and having had a mammogram in the year before baseline assessment were positive predictors of mammography at post-test. Perceived risk, calculated risk, and relationship to index cancer case were not associated with mammography receipt. CONCLUSION The intervention was successful in increasing mammography rates among high-risk women 50+ years of age. Further work is needed to determine why it was ineffective among younger women.

[1]  B. Rimer,et al.  Evaluation of three methods for improving mammography rates in a managed care plan. , 1997, American journal of preventive medicine.

[2]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Prediction of goal directed behaviour: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioural control , 1986 .

[3]  M. Gail,et al.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  M. Slattery,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of family history and breast cancer risk. The Utah Population Database. , 1993, JAMA.

[5]  J. Herndon,et al.  Breast cancer screening among relatives of women with breast cancer. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[6]  P. Wingo,et al.  Family history and the risk of breast cancer. , 1985, JAMA.

[7]  R. Roetzheim,et al.  The influence of risk factors on breast carcinoma screening of Medicare‐insured older women , 1996, Cancer.

[8]  P. Gimotty,et al.  Factors affecting participation in a mammography screening program among members of an urban Detroit health maintenance organization. , 1998, Cancer detection and prevention.

[9]  W M Tierney,et al.  Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences. A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys. , 1997, Medical care.

[10]  W. Willett,et al.  Risk factors for breast cancer in women with a breast cancer family history. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[11]  P. Engstrom,et al.  Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  D. May,et al.  Has the use of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening increased in the United States? , 1995, American journal of public health.

[13]  J. Krischer,et al.  Identification and screening of women at high risk of breast cancer. , 1988, Cancer detection and prevention.

[14]  S. Folkman,et al.  [An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample]. , 1980, Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research.

[15]  T. Mack,et al.  Impact of a mailed intervention on annual mammography and physician breast examinations among women at high risk of breast cancer. , 1996, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[16]  D. Quade,et al.  Measuring the use of mammography: two methods compared. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[17]  R. Haynes,et al.  A taxonomy and critical review of tested strategies for the application of clinical practice recommendations: from "official" to "individual" clinical policy. , 1988, American journal of preventive medicine.

[18]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[19]  J. Holland,et al.  Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  Lawrence W. Green,et al.  Health Education Planning: A Diagnostic Approach , 1979 .

[21]  M. Venters.  Family life and cardiovascular risk: implications for the prevention of chronic disease. , 1986, Social science & medicine.

[22]  John W. Farquhar,et al.  The American way of life need not be hazardous to your health , 1978 .

[23]  W. Rakowski,et al.  Cancer screening practices among women in a community health center population. , 1996, American journal of preventive medicine.

[24]  C. McHorney,et al.  Comparisons of the Costs and Quality of Norms for the SF-36 Health Survey Collected by Mail Versus Telephone Interview: Results From a National Survey , 1994, Medical care.

[25]  I. Rosenstock,et al.  Social Learning Theory and the Health Belief Model , 1988, Health education quarterly.

[26]  C. Harris.  Solving the viral-chemical puzzle of human liver carcinogenesis. , 1994, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[27]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[28]  C. McBride,et al.  A randomized trial of the impact of risk assessment and feedback on participation in mammography screening. , 1993, Preventive medicine.

[29]  A. Marcus,et al.  Evaluation of an intervention to increase mammography screening in Los Angeles. , 1994, Preventive medicine.

[30]  R. Hayward,et al.  Preventive Care Guidelines: 1991 , 1991 .

[31]  A L Greer,et al.  The State of the Art Versus the State of the Science: The Diffusion of New Medical Technologies into Practice , 1988, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[32]  R. Elashoff,et al.  Patient Adherence to Cancer Control Regimens: Scale Development and Initial Validation , 1993 .

[33]  R. Winn,et al.  Mammographic screening of women with increased risk of breast cancer , 1990, Cancer.

[34]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[35]  J. Zapka,et al.  Mammography use among sociodemographically diverse women: the accuracy of self-report. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[36]  W. Rakowski,et al.  Mammography, clinical breast exam, and pap testing: correlates of combined screening. , 1996, American journal of preventive medicine.

[37]  E. Paskett,et al.  Validation of self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening tests among low-income minority women. , 1996, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[38]  A. Marcus,et al.  Screening mammography rates and barriers to use: a Los Angeles County survey. , 1991, Preventive medicine.

[39]  B. Rimer,et al.  Awareness of heightened breast cancer risk among first-degree relatives of recently diagnosed breast cancer patients. The High Risk Breast Cancer Consortium. , 1995, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[40]  M. Becker,et al.  The Health Belief Model: Origins and Correlates in Psychological Theory* , 1974 .

[41]  X Tonesk,et al.  Implementing clinical practice guidelines: social influence strategies and practitioner behavior change. , 1992, QRB. Quality review bulletin.