Dynamics of flow in a mechanical heart valve: the role of leaflet inertia and leaflet compliance.

In this work, we examine the dynamics of fluid flow in a mechanical heart valve when the solid inertia and leaflet compliance are important. The fluid is incompressible and Newtonian, and the leaflet is an incompressible neo-Hookean material. In the case of an inertialess leaflet, we find that the maximum valve opening angle and the time that the valve remains closed increase as the shear modulus of the leaflet decreases. More importantly, the regurgitant volume decreases with decreasing shear modulus. When we examined the forces exerted on the leaflet, we found that the downward motion of the leaflet is initiated by a vertical force exerted on its right side and, later on, by a vertical force exerted on the top side of the leaflet. In the case of solid inertia, we find that the maximum valve opening angle and the regurgitant volume are larger than in the case of an inertialess leaflet. These results highlight the importance of solid compliance in the dynamics of blood flow in a mechanical heart valve. More importantly, they indicate that mechanical heart valves with compliant leaflets may have smaller regurgitant volumes and smaller shear stresses than the ones with rigid leaflets.

[1]  Philip M. Gresho,et al.  The implementation of normal and/or tangential boundary conditions in finite element codes for incompressible fluid flow , 1982 .

[2]  Patrick Amestoy,et al.  A Fully Asynchronous Multifrontal Solver Using Distributed Dynamic Scheduling , 2001, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[3]  van de Fn Frans Vosse,et al.  Evaluation of a fictitious domain method for predicting dynamic response of mechanical heart valves , 2004 .

[4]  David E. Schmidt,et al.  On the biomechanics of heart valve function. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  M. Gharib,et al.  Vortex shedding as a mechanism for free emboli formation in mechanical heart valves. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  H. S. Udaykumar,et al.  Two-Dimensional Dynamic Simulation of Platelet Activation During Mechanical Heart Valve Closure , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Xiangmin Jiao,et al.  Fluid–structure interactions of the mitral valve and left heart: Comprehensive strategies, past, present and future , 2010, International journal for numerical methods in engineering.

[8]  Steven Deutsch,et al.  Regurgitant flow field characteristics of the St. Jude bileaflet mechanical heart valve under physiologic pulsatile flow using particle image velocimetry. , 2003, Artificial organs.

[9]  K B Chandran,et al.  Effect of prosthetic mitral valve geometry and orientation on flow dynamics in a model human left ventricle. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Valérie Deplano,et al.  Validation of a numerical 3-D fluid-structure interaction model for a prosthetic valve based on experimental PIV measurements. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  Flow in Prosthetic Heart Valves: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Michael S Sacks,et al.  Bioengineering challenges for heart valve tissue engineering. , 2009, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[13]  Jia Lu,et al.  Fluid–structure interaction methods in biological flows with special emphasis on heart valve dynamics , 2010 .

[14]  Christos Housiadas,et al.  A time-dependent numerical analysis of flow in a mechanical heart valve: Comparison with experimental results , 2010 .

[15]  Jens-Dominik Mueller,et al.  Validation of a fluid–structure interaction model for a bileaflet mechanical heart valve , 2008 .

[16]  Chang Nyung Kim,et al.  Numerical Analysis on the Hemodynamics and Leaflet Dynamics in a Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valve Using a Fluid-Structure Interaction Method , 2009, ASAIO journal.

[17]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  A review of state-of-the-art numerical methods for simulating flow through mechanical heart valves , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[18]  Sandip Sarkar,et al.  Current developments and future prospects for heart valve replacement therapy. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[19]  J Vierendeels,et al.  Validation of a Fluid–Structure Interaction Model of a Heart Valve using the Dynamic Mesh Method in Fluent , 2004, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[20]  R. Cheng,et al.  Three-Dimensional Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation of Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valve Flow Dynamics , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  G. G. Peters,et al.  A two-dimensional fluid–structure interaction model of the aortic value , 2000 .

[22]  G. Hahn.  A modified Euler method for dynamic analyses , 1991 .

[23]  J. Boyle,et al.  Solvers for large-displacement fluid–structure interaction problems: segregated versus monolithic approaches , 2008 .

[24]  F P T Baaijens,et al.  A three-dimensional computational analysis of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic valve. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  L. E. Malvern.  Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium , 1969 .

[26]  Patrick Amestoy,et al.  Hybrid scheduling for the parallel solution of linear systems , 2006, Parallel Comput..