Anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangements in patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: CT characteristics and response to chemotherapy

Few articles have been published on the imaging findings of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)‐positive non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To investigate the radiological findings of ALK‐positive NSCLC in the advanced stage, CT scans were examined. In addition, the response to chemotherapy was evaluated. Of the 36 patients with ALK‐rearranged NSCLC, a mass and a nodule were identified in 17 (47.2%) and 16 (44.4%), respectively, indicating that more than 40% had a small‐sized tumor. Overall, 31 (86.1%) patients had lymphadenopathy, seven (19.4%) had extranodal lymph node invasion, and three (8.3%) had lymphangitis. A pleural effusion was seen in 15 patients (41.7%). All but one patient had no ground‐glass opacity (GGO) lesions, indicating that most ALK‐positive tumors showed a solid growth pattern without GGO on CT. Twenty were evaluable for response to chemotherapy; 10 (50.0%) had a partial response (PR), nine (45.0%) had stable disease (SD), and one (5.0%) had progressive disease (PD) with first‐line chemotherapy. With second‐line chemotherapy, five (26.3%) had PR, 11 (57.9%) had SD, and three (15.8%) had PD. The five patients with PR were all treated by using crizotinib. Time to progression was 8.2 months with first‐line chemotherapy, and 6.0 months with second‐line chemotherapy. Advanced‐stage ALK‐positive tumors have a relatively aggressive phenotype, which cannot be inferred from the size of the tumor alone. ALK‐positive patients have a good response to first‐line cytotoxic drugs and to crizotinib as second‐line therapy, but a relatively poor response to cytotoxic drugs as second‐line therapy.

[1]  S. Digumarthy,et al.  Clinical features and outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who harbor EML4-ALK. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  M. Varella‐Garcia,et al.  Correlations between the percentage of tumor cells showing an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement, ALK signal copy number, and response to crizotinib therapy in ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization–positive nonsmall cell lung cancer , 2012, Cancer.

[3]  K. Matsuo,et al.  Clinicoradiologic characteristics of patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EML4-ALK fusion oncogene. , 2012, Lung cancer.

[4]  I. Petersen,et al.  Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results of a multi-centre ALK-testing. , 2013, Lung cancer.

[5]  K. Yasumoto,et al.  Peripheral lung adenocarcinoma: correlation of thin-section CT findings with histologic prognostic factors and survival. , 2001, Radiology.

[6]  P. Jänne,et al.  The biology and treatment of EML4-ALK non-small cell lung cancer. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[7]  Jeffrey W. Clark,et al.  Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated results from a phase 1 study. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  Y. Yatabe,et al.  A Screening Method for the ALK Fusion Gene in NSCLC , 2012, Front. Oncol..

[9]  Y. Ishikawa,et al.  Multiplex Reverse Transcription-PCR Screening for EML4-ALK Fusion Transcripts , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  Derek Y. Chiang,et al.  EML4-ALK Fusion Gene and Efficacy of an ALK Kinase Inhibitor in Lung Cancer , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  M. Okada,et al.  Correlation between computed tomographic findings, bronchioloalveolar carcinoma component, and biologic behavior of small-sized lung adenocarcinomas. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  H. Aburatani,et al.  Identification of the transforming EML4–ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer , 2007, Nature.