Exploring long lifetime routing (LLR) in ad hoc networks

In mobile ad hoc networks, node mobility causes links between nodes to break frequently, thus terminating the lifetime of the routes containing those links. An alternative route has to be discovered once a link is detected as broken, incurring extra route discovery overhead and packet latency. A simple solution to reduce the frequency of this costly discovery procedure is to choose a long lifetime route carefully during the route discovery phase rather than a simple random shortest-path route scheme. This simple solution, although straightforward, requires investigation of several questions before it can be implemented. Specifically, how much effect does node mobility have on the link lifetime? Correspondingly, how much effect does it have on the route lifetime? How much lifetime extension can we achieve by using a long lifetime route compared to a randomly chosen shortest-path route? How much benefit can we obtain by using these longer lifetime routes, and what is the tradeoff of using them? By answering these questions, we gain enough insight to determine under what circumstances long lifetime routes are worth being discovered and implemented. In this paper, we first formulate the distribution of a link lifetime and correspondingly the distribution of a route lifetime. Then we present an algorithm to determine the longest lifetime routes at different route lengths. We experimentally compare these long lifetime routes with traditional random shortest-path routes and reveal the tradeoff of using long lifetime routes of different lengths. All the fundamental results will serve as the guideline for our future implementation of a distributed long lifetime routing protocol.

[1]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers , 1994, SIGCOMM.

[2]  Tomasz Imielinski,et al.  Mobile Computing , 1996 .

[3]  M. S. Corson,et al.  A highly adaptive distributed routing algorithm for mobile wireless networks , 1997, Proceedings of INFOCOM '97.

[4]  Chai-Keong Toh,et al.  Associativity-Based Routing for Ad Hoc Mobile Networks , 1997, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[5]  Satish K. Tripathi,et al.  Signal stability-based adaptive routing (SSA) for ad hoc mobile networks , 1997, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[6]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[7]  Taieb Znati,et al.  A path availability model for wireless ad-hoc networks , 1999, WCNC. 1999 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (Cat. No.99TH8466).

[8]  Nitin H. Vaidya,et al.  Analysis of TCP Performance over Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 1999, Wirel. Networks.

[9]  Sulobh Agorcvol Route-Lifetime Assessment Based Routing (RABR) Protocol for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks , 2000 .

[10]  Dhananjay S. Phatak,et al.  Preemptive routing in Ad Hoc networks , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[11]  Jeff Boleng,et al.  Metrics to Enable Adaptive Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2002 .

[12]  Tracy Camp,et al.  A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research , 2002, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[13]  Matthias Frank,et al.  Link stability in mobile wireless ad hoc networks , 2002, 27th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, 2002. Proceedings. LCN 2002..

[14]  Philippe Jacquet,et al.  Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) , 2003, RFC.

[15]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  Performance of multihop wireless networks: shortest path is not enough , 2003, CCRV.

[16]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  The Number of Neighbors Needed for Connectivity of Wireless Networks , 2004, Wirel. Networks.