Nanoscale pore structure characterization of the Bakken shale in the USA

Abstract Understanding the pore structures of unconventional reservoirs such as shale can assist in estimating their elastic transport and storage properties, thus enhancing the hydrocarbon recovery from such massive resources. Bakken Shale Formation is one of the largest shale oil reserves worldwide located in the Williston Basin, North America. In this paper, we collected a few samples from the Bakken and characterized their properties by using complementary methods including X-ray diffraction (XRD), N 2 and CO 2 adsorption, and Rock-Eval pyrolysis. The results showed that all range of pore sizes: micro ( 50 nm) exist in the Bakken shale samples. Meso-pores and macro-pores are the main contributors to the porosity for these samples. Compared with the Middle Bakken, samples from Upper and Lower Bakken own more micro pore volumes. Fractal dimension analysis was performed on the pore size distribution data, and the results indicated more complex pore structures for samples taken from the Upper and Lower Bakken shales than the Middle Bakken. Furthermore, the deconvolution of the pore distribution function from the combination of N 2 and CO 2 adsorption results proved that five typical pore size families exist in the Bakken shale samples: one micro-pore, one macro-pore and three meso-pore size families. The studies on the correlations between the compositions and the pore structures showed that mostly feldspar and pyrite affect the total pore volume of samples from Middle Bakken Formation whereas clay dominates the total pore volume of samples from Upper/Lower Bakken Formation. TOC and clay content are the major contributors to the micro-pore size family in the Upper/Lower Bakken. Also, it was observed that the increase of hard minerals could increase the percentage of macro-pore family in the Middle Bakken Formation.

[1]  Jianchao Cai,et al.  Investigation on the pore structure and multifractal characteristics of tight oil reservoirs using NMR measurements: Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusaer Sag, Junggar Basin , 2017 .

[2]  R. Loucks,et al.  Morphology, Genesis, and Distribution of Nanometer-Scale Pores in Siliceous Mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale , 2009 .

[3]  S. Brunauer,et al.  The Use of Low Temperature van der Waals Adsorption Isotherms in Determining the Surface Area of Iron Synthetic Ammonia Catalysts , 1937 .

[4]  A. Schimmelmann,et al.  Geochemical constraints on the origin and volume of gas in the New Albany Shale (Devonian–Mississippian), eastern Illinois Basin , 2010 .

[5]  János Urai,et al.  Multi-scale characterization of porosity in Boom Clay (HADES-level, Mol, Belgium) using a combination of X-ray μ-CT, 2D BIB-SEM and FIB-SEM tomography , 2015 .

[6]  Irving Langmuir,et al.  THE CONSTITUTION AND FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES OF SOLIDS AND LIQUIDS. II. LIQUIDS.1 , 1917 .

[7]  H. Kazemi,et al.  Reservoir Rock Characterization Using Centrifuge and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: A Laboratory Study of Middle Bakken Cores , 2015 .

[8]  T. Ziegler,et al.  Nonlocal density functional theory as a practical tool in calculations on transition states and activation energies. Applications to elementary reaction steps in organic chemistry , 1992 .

[9]  K. Bowker.  Barnett Shale gas production, Fort Worth Basin: Issues and discussion , 2007 .

[10]  J. Urai,et al.  A comparative study of representative 2D microstructures in Shaly and Sandy facies of Opalinus Clay (Mont Terri, Switzerland) inferred form BIB-SEM and MIP methods , 2014 .

[11]  E. Teller,et al.  ADSORPTION OF GASES IN MULTIMOLECULAR LAYERS , 1938 .

[12]  Fred P. Wang,et al.  Pore Networks and Fluid Flow in Gas Shales , 2009 .

[13]  E. Barrett,et al.  (CONTRIBUTION FROM THE MULTIPLE FELLOWSHIP OF BAUGH AND SONS COMPANY, MELLOX INSTITUTE) The Determination of Pore Volume and Area Distributions in Porous Substances. I. Computations from Nitrogen Isotherms , 1951 .

[14]  O. P. Gupta,et al.  A fractal description of transport phenomena in dendritic porous network , 2006 .

[15]  G. Sandí,et al.  Determination of fractal dimensions of solid carbons from gas and liquid phase adsorption isotherms , 2000 .

[16]  Zhiguang Song,et al.  A comparative study of the specific surface area and pore structure of different shales and their kerogens , 2015, Science China Earth Sciences.

[17]  C. Peach,et al.  Microstructures of Early Jurassic (Toarcian) shales of Northern Europe , 2016 .

[18]  D. B. Bennion,et al.  Gas Condensate Reservoir Performance , 2009 .

[19]  J. Dewar.  The Absorption and Thermal Evolution of Gases Occluded in Charcoal at Low Temperatures , 2022, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[20]  Yanbin Yao,et al.  Fractal characterization of adsorption-pores of coals from North China: An investigation on CH4 adsorption capacity of coals , 2008 .

[21]  Ali Saeedi,et al.  Evaluation of pore size spectrum of gas shale reservoirs using low pressure nitrogen adsorption, gas expansion and mercury porosimetry: A case study from the Perth and Canning Basins, Western Australia , 2013 .

[22]  D. Avnir,et al.  Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids (Technical Report) , 1994 .

[23]  U. Kuila,et al.  Specific surface area and pore‐size distribution in clays and shales , 2013 .

[24]  F. Javadpour.  Nanopores and Apparent Permeability of Gas Flow in Mudrocks (Shales and Siltstone) , 2009 .

[25]  Javier Pérez-Ramírez,et al.  Pore size determination in modified micro- and mesoporous materials. Pitfalls and limitations in gas adsorption data analysis , 2003 .

[26]  János Urai,et al.  BIB-SEM pore characterization of mature and post mature Posidonia Shale samples from the Hils area, Germany , 2016 .

[27]  János Urai,et al.  BIB-SEM study of the pore space morphology in early mature Posidonia Shale from the Hils area, Germany , 2012 .

[28]  Po‐zen Wong,et al.  Adsorption isotherms of fractal surfaces , 2002 .

[29]  A. Neimark,et al.  Density functional theory model for calculating pore size distributions: pore structure of nanoporous catalysts , 1998 .

[30]  Weiqi Wang,et al.  Improved pore-structure characterization in shale formations with FESEM technique , 2016 .

[31]  Farzam Javadpour,et al.  Atomic-Force Microscopy: A New Tool for Gas-Shale Characterization , 2012 .

[32]  David R. Cole,et al.  Characterization and Analysis of Porosity and Pore Structures , 2015 .

[33]  D. Avnir,et al.  An isotherm equation for adsorption on fractal surfaces of heterogeneous porous materials , 1989 .

[34]  Pengfei Wang,et al.  Effect of Organic Matter and Maturity on Pore Size Distribution and Gas Storage Capacity in High-Mature to Post-Mature Shales , 2016 .

[35]  François Toutlemonde,et al.  The nano-mechanical signature of Ultra High Performance Concrete by statistical nanoindentation techniques , 2008 .

[36]  Celso Peres Fernandes,et al.  Characterization of pore systems in seal rocks using Nitrogen Gas Adsorption combined with Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure techniques , 2013 .

[37]  B. Garcia,et al.  New Rock-Eval Method for Characterization of Unconventional Shale Resource Systems , 2016 .

[38]  Nacim Betrouni,et al.  Fractal and multifractal analysis: A review , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[39]  Luo Xingping,et al.  Study on the response mechanisms of nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR)log in tight oil reservoirs , 2016 .

[40]  Fred Kofi Boadu,et al.  Predicting the transport properties of fractured rocks from seismic information: numerical experiments , 2000 .

[41]  B. Hart,et al.  Characterizing the Middle Bakken: Laboratory Measurement and Rock Typing of the Middle Bakken Formation , 2015 .

[42]  Hongbin Zhan,et al.  Pore structure characterization of Chang-7 tight sandstone using MICP combined with N2GA techniques and its geological control factors , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[43]  J. Raper,et al.  Limitation of Determination of Surface Fractal Dimension using N2 Adsorption Isotherms and Modified Frenkel-Halsey-Hill Theory , 2003 .

[44]  Jiafei Zhao,et al.  Fractal analysis and its impact factors on pore structure of artificial cores based on the images obtained using magnetic resonance imaging , 2012 .

[45]  A. D. Johnson,et al.  Combining Mercury Intrusion and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Measurements Using Percolation Theory , 2016, Transport in Porous Media.

[46]  S. Blacher,et al.  Applicability of the Fractal FHH Equation , 1997 .

[47]  Franz-Josef Ulm,et al.  Statistical indentation techniques for hydrated nanocomposites: concrete, bone, and shale , 2007 .

[48]  F. Behar,et al.  Rock-Eval 6 Technology: Performances and Developments , 2001 .

[49]  D. Do,et al.  Pore Characterization of Carbonaceous Materials by DFT and GCMC Simulations: A Review , 2003 .

[50]  鈴木 昇.  Determination of the Specific Surface Area of Powders (Solids) by Gas Adsorption-BET Method : Introduction and Explanation of JIS Z 8830 : 2013 , 2013 .

[51]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs , 2009 .

[52]  M. Ostadhassan,et al.  Quantification of the microstructures of Bakken shale reservoirs using multi-fractal and lacunarity analysis , 2017 .

[53]  J. A. Schwarz,et al.  A modified approach for estimating pseudo-vapor pressures in the application of the Dubinin-Astakhov equation , 1995 .

[54]  Bingsong Yu,et al.  Nanoscale pore characteristics of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation Shale: A case study from Well Yuke #1 in the Southeast of Chongqing, China , 2016 .

[55]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Pore structure characterization of North American shale gas reservoirs using USANS/SANS, gas adsorption, and mercury intrusion , 2013 .

[56]  A. Neimark,et al.  Unified Approach to Pore Size Characterization of Microporous Carbonaceous Materials from N2, Ar, and CO2 Adsorption Isotherms† , 2000 .

[57]  M Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  Contrôle optimal d’échauffement du moteur dans les véhicules hybrides , 2016 .

[58]  M. Mastalerz,et al.  Standardization of reflectance measurements in dispersed organic matter: Results of an exercise to improve interlaboratory agreement , 2015 .

[59]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[60]  Junqian Li,et al.  Fractal Characteristics of Coal Pores Based on Classic Geometry and Thermodynamics Models , 2011 .

[61]  X. Xiao,et al.  Evolution of nanoporosity in organic-rich shales during thermal maturation , 2014 .

[62]  B. Horsfield,et al.  Geochemical evolution of organic-rich shales with increasing maturity: A STXM and TEM study of the Posidonia Shale (Lower Toarcian, northern Germany) , 2012 .