Does Computer-Assisted Spine Surgery Reduce Intraoperative Radiation Doses?

Study Design. Prospective clinical study. Objective. Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) means improved accuracy in inserting screws. Usually the required time of the intraoperative use of a C-arm device is reduced. The aim of the study was to quantify the radiation doses during spine surgery in different types of computer-assisted surgical procedures (i.e., computerized tomography [CT] based and C-arm) compared to standard methods and, as a new technique, the Iso-C3D C-arm (Siemens, GER). Summary of Background Data. A total of 38 individuals were enrolled in the study, including 8 who underwent standard spine surgery, 10 with CT-based, 9 with C-arm based, and 11 with Iso-C3D C-arm based. The thermoluminescence dosimetry measurements were 2 at the radiation source, 2 at the patient, and 2 at the receiver. Methods. This study is based on the thermoluminescence method. A total of 38 individuals were enrolled in the study. Despite the small number of patients, the existing results up until now showed a clear reduction of the duration of radiation time using CAS compared to standard methods in spine surgery. Much more important is the fact that the radiation doses were clearly reduced from a median of 1091 mGy using the standard procedure versus 432 mGy in CT-based and 664 mGy in C-arm based guided surgery. The Iso-C3D C-arm showed a median of 152 mGy. Results. The duration of radiation was reduced from 177 seconds in the standard spine procedure to 75 seconds in CT-based CAS spine intervention. Comparing the different types of CAS application at the spine, the Iso-C3D C-arm based surgery is the method with the lowest duration of radiation. The radiation doses at the C-arm tube (source) are reduced from a median of 1091 mGy in the standard procedure versus 432 mGy in CT-based and 664 mGy in C-arm based guided surgery. In this study, the median dose of an Iso-C3D C-arm was 152 mGy. Conclusion. These findings are important for the operating room personnel, which is exposed daily to radiation intraoperatively, as well as the patients, when using CAS procedures.

[1]  L Kinzl,et al.  Spinal navigation in cervical fractures--a preliminary clinical study on Judet-osteosynthesis of the axis. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[2]  Y. Rampersaud,et al.  Radiation Exposure to the Spine Surgeon During Fluoroscopically Assisted Pedicle Screw Insertion , 2000, Spine.

[3]  T. Lund,et al.  A new approach to computer-aided spine surgery: fluoroscopy-based surgical navigation , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[4]  H N Herkowitz,et al.  Spinal pedicle fixation. Confirmation of an image-based technique for screw placement. , 1993, Spine.

[5]  L P Nolte,et al.  Fluoroscopy as an imaging means for computer-assisted surgical navigation. , 1999, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[6]  R. Van Audekercke,et al.  Internal fixation of the spine in traumatic and scoliotic cases. The potential of pedicle screws. , 1996, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[7]  L. Kinzl,et al.  [Limits of CT-based computer navigation in spinal surgery]. , 2000, Der Unfallchirurg.

[8]  L. Nolte,et al.  Improved Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion With Computer-Assisted Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Trial of 30 Patients , 1997, Spine.

[9]  P. Vock,et al.  Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion. Fluoroscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery. , 1999, Spine.

[10]  Kee D. Kim,et al.  Computer-Assisted Thoracic Pedicle Screw Placement: An In Vitro Feasibility Study , 2001, Spine.

[11]  A Hamadeh,et al.  Computer Assisted Spine Surgery , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.