On the progressive spread over strategic diffusion: Asymptotic and computation

We study how an innovation (e.g., product or technology) diffuses over a social network when individuals strategically make selfish, rational choices in adopting the new innovation. This diffusion has been studied by modeling individuals' interactions with a noisy best response dynamic over a networked coordination game, but mainly in the nonprogressive setup. In this paper, we study the case when people are progressive, i.e., never going back to the old technology once the new technology is chosen, where such a progressive behavior is explained using the notion of sunk cost fallacy in social psychology. Our main focus is on the diffusion time, i.e., time till all choose the new innovation. To this end, we first provide a combinatorial characterization of the diffusion time that corresponds to the time reaching the absorbing state in a Markov chain. Based on this, we propose a polynomial-time algorithm that computes the diffusion time, where such a task is known to be computationally intractable in the non-progressive diffusion. Second, we asymptotically quantify the diffusion times for a class of well-known social graph topologies, and compare them to those under the non-progressive diffusion. Finally, we study the impact of seeding to speed up the diffusion in the progressive setup, and show that the diffusion speed is impossible to significantly accelerate with just a small-budget seeding, which is in part in stark contrast to that in the non-progressive diffusion. Our results provide not only understandings on the progressive strategic diffusion in a social network, but also computational tractability on other related problems, e.g., seeding, which we believe should be of broader interest in the future.

[1]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Learning to Discover Social Circles in Ego Networks , 2012, NIPS.

[2]  Sujay Sanghavi,et al.  Learning the graph of epidemic cascades , 2012, SIGMETRICS '12.

[3]  Jinwoo Shin,et al.  On the impact of global information on diffusion of innovations over social networks , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[4]  R. McKelvey,et al.  Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games , 1995 .

[5]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  Individual Strategy and Social Structure , 2020 .

[6]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining the network value of customers , 2001, KDD '01.

[7]  2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, INFOCOM 2015, Kowloon, Hong Kong, April 26 - May 1, 2015 , 2015, IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[8]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  The role of compatibility in the diffusion of technologies through social networks , 2007, EC '07.

[9]  A. J. Hall Infectious diseases of humans: R. M. Anderson & R. M. May. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press, 1991. viii + 757 pp. Price £50. ISBN 0-19-854599-1 , 1992 .

[10]  Marc Lelarge Diffusion and cascading behavior in random networks , 2012, Games Econ. Behav..

[11]  W. O. Kermack,et al.  Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics—II. The problem of endemicity , 1991, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[12]  L. Blume The Statistical Mechanics of Strategic Interaction , 1993 .

[13]  E. Ising Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus , 1925 .

[14]  Dilip Mookherjee,et al.  Learning behavior in an experimental matching pennies game , 1994 .

[15]  Srinivas Shakkottai,et al.  Influence maximization in social networks: An ising-model-based approach , 2010, 2010 48th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[16]  Aditya Gopalan,et al.  Epidemic Spreading With External Agents , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[17]  Marc Lelarge Coordination in network security games , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[18]  N. Ling The Mathematical Theory of Infectious Diseases and its applications , 1978 .

[19]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Epidemic thresholds in real networks , 2008, TSEC.

[20]  Andrea Montanari,et al.  Convergence to Equilibrium in Local Interaction Games , 2009, 2009 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[21]  Alexander Grey,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Infectious Diseases and Its Applications , 1977 .

[22]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  The effect of network topology on the spread of epidemics , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[23]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Influential Nodes in a Diffusion Model for Social Networks , 2005, ICALP.

[24]  Glenn Ellison Learning, Local Interaction, and Coordination , 1993 .

[25]  Ayalvadi J. Ganesh,et al.  A random walk model for infection on graphs: spread of epidemics & rumours with mobile agents , 2010, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[26]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[27]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[28]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[29]  Emilie Coupechoux,et al.  Impact of clustering on diffusions and contagions in random networks , 2011, International Conference on NETwork Games, Control and Optimization (NetGCooP 2011).

[30]  R. Rob,et al.  Learning, Mutation, and Long Run Equilibria in Games , 1993 .

[31]  Jinwoo Shin,et al.  On maximizing diffusion speed in social networks: impact of random seeding and clustering , 2014, SIGMETRICS '14.

[32]  E. Young Contagion , 2015, New Scientist.

[33]  Herbert W. Hethcote,et al.  The Mathematics of Infectious Diseases , 2000, SIAM Rev..

[34]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..