Neural network for female mate preference, trained by a genetic algorithm
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Kamo | Takuya Kubo | Y. Iwasa | T. Kubo | Masashi Kamo
[1] C. Darwin. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex: INDEX , 1871 .
[2] R. A. Fisher,et al. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .
[3] K. Spence. The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. , 1937 .
[4] N. Guttman,et al. Discriminability and stimulus generalization. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.
[5] H. M. Hanson. Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.
[6] J. Staddon. A Note on the Evolutionary Significance of "Supernormal" Stimuli , 1975, The American Naturalist.
[7] A. Zahavi. The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). , 1977, Journal of theoretical biology.
[8] R. Lande. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[9] W. Hamilton,et al. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? , 1982, Science.
[10] A. Grafen. Biological signals as handicaps. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.
[11] Lawrence. Davis,et al. Handbook Of Genetic Algorithms , 1990 .
[12] Y. Iwasa,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE “HANDICAP” PRINCIPLE , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[13] M. Kirkpatrick,et al. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek , 1991, Nature.
[14] Yoh Iwasa,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES I. FISHER AND BIASED MUTATION , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[15] M. Ryan,et al. Directional Patterns of Female Mate Choice and the Role of Sensory Biases , 1992, The American Naturalist.
[16] Y. Iwasa,et al. Evolution of multiple sexual preferences by Fisher’s runaway process of sexual selection , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[17] M. Enquist,et al. Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses , 1993, Nature.
[18] M. Enquist,et al. Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals , 1993 .
[19] Y. Iwasa,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF MATE PREFERENCES FOR MULTIPLE SEXUAL ORNAMENTS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[20] R. Johnstone. Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition , 1994, Nature.
[21] Magnus Enquist,et al. Symmetry, beauty and evolution , 1994, Nature.
[22] Isamu Kajitani,et al. Egrets of a Feather Flock Together , 1994, Artificial Life.
[23] Y. Iwasa,et al. Continual change in mate preferences , 1995, Nature.
[24] Angelo Monfroglio,et al. Book review: Neural Network and Fuzzy Logic Applications in C/C++ by Stephen T. Welstead (John Wiley & Sons 1994) , 1995, SGAR.
[25] T. Guilford,et al. An exaggerated preference for simple neural network models of signal evolution? , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[26] Magnus Enquist,et al. Artefact or network evolution? , 1995, Nature.
[27] A Arak,et al. Conflict, receiver bias and the evolution of signal form. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[28] Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs , 1996, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.