A Common Capacity Limitation for Response and Item Selection in Working Memory

Successful completion of any cognitive task requires selecting a particular action and the object the action is applied to. Oberauer (2009) suggested a working memory (WM) model comprising a declarative and a procedural part with analogous structures. One important assumption of this model is that both parts work independently of each other, and previous work has indeed reported evidence for the independent selection of memory lists and tasks, for example. The present study focused on the selection of single items in declarative and single responses in procedural WM. To this end, WM updating tasks were implemented as Task 2 in a Psychological Refractory Period setup in 3 experiments. The prediction based on the locus of slack logic is that item switch costs are present with a long but not with a short stimulus onset asynchrony. Contrary to this prediction, item switch costs were neither absent nor at least smaller at the short stimulus onset asynchrony. These results help to further constrain the WM model and thus to refine its computational implementation.

[1]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  Control and interference in task switching--a review. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition Exceptions to the PRP Effect ? A Comparison of Prepared and Unconditioned Reflexes , 2014 .

[3]  Richard Schweickert,et al.  A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task , 1978 .

[4]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  The locus of tool-transformation costs. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  K. Oberauer Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  V. Franz,et al.  Grasping for parsimony: Do some motor actions escape dorsal processing? , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Design for a working memory. , 2009 .

[8]  W. Kunde,et al.  On the costs of refocusing items in working memory: A matter of inhibition or decay? , 2008, Memory.

[9]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  R. Dell’Acqua,et al.  The Demonstration of Short-Term Consolidation , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Analogous mechanisms of selection and updating in declarative and procedural working memory: Experiments and a computational model , 2013, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Processing of representations in declarative and procedural working memory , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Selection of objects and tasks in working memory , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  Markus Janczyk,et al.  The benefit of no choice: goal-directed plans enhance perceptual processing , 2015, Psychological research.

[15]  Ann Reynolds,et al.  The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Markus Janczyk,et al.  Level 2 perspective taking entails two processes: evidence from PRP experiments. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  H Garavan,et al.  Co-ordination within and between verbal and visuospatial working memory: network modulation and anterior frontal recruitment , 2003, NeuroImage.

[18]  C. W. Telford The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses , 1931 .

[19]  K. Oberauer The focus of attention in working memory—from metaphors to mechanisms , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[20]  Hugh Garavan,et al.  Serial attention within working memory , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Alessandra S. Souza,et al.  Interference within and between declarative and procedural representations in working memory , 2014 .

[22]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  Action selection by temporally distal goal states , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Markus Janczyk,et al.  Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules , 2013, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[25]  J. Grabowski,et al.  The focus of attention in working memory: Evidence from a word updating task , 2011, Memory.