OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate IV injection of a single dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine for three-dimensional (3D) arterial phase MR angiography of the carotid arteries.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Nine adult patients were serially imaged after IV injection of a single-dose bolus of gadopentetate dimeglumine at 1.5 T with a coronal single-slice spoiled two-dimensional (2D) gradient-echo acquisition encompassing the common carotid arteries and internal jugular veins. Region-of-interest measurements for the nine patients generated a composite arteriovenous signal versus time profile. The time interval of maximum arteriovenous signal difference was subsequently matched to the center of K-space in a 3D spoiled gradient-echo coronal MR angiography sequence (field of view, 24 or 26 cm; matrix size, 256 x 128; slice thickness, 3 mm; number of slices, 12; one excitation; bandwidth, 16 kHz; and scan time, 29 sec). This protocol allowed us to selectively enhance the arterial phase for carotid angiography. The protocol was then tested in 20 adult patients, after which we graded the degree of coincidental venous enhancement and the presence of artifacts.
RESULTS
On the 2D dynamic images, we identified a 10-sec window of selective arterial enhancement that began 20 sec after the start of the injection of the bolus of gadopentetate dimeglumine. With 3D MR angiography, we saw selective enhancement during the arterial phase of carotid MR angiography in nine of 20 patients. In seven of the remaining 11 patients, we saw the signal intensity of the arterial phase exceed a threshold greater than two standard deviations from venous signal. In the final four patients, we saw arterial signal equal to venous signal. We saw no ghosting artifact (from intravascular signal changing too rapidly during phase encoding) in any patient.
CONCLUSION
By precisely timing the infusion of a single dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine, we were able to selectively enhance the arterial phase on 3D MR angiograms of the carotid arteries.
[1]
E M Haacke,et al.
Gadolinium‐enhanced high‐resolution MR angiography with adaptive vessel tracking: Preliminary results in the intracranial circulation
,
1992,
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[2]
R. Edelman.
MR angiography: present and future.
,
1993,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[3]
J. Kaufman,et al.
MR imaging (including MR angiography) of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison with conventional angiography.
,
1994,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[4]
V M Runge,et al.
Contrast‐enhanced MR angiography
,
1993,
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[5]
J. Michiels,et al.
Contrast-enhanced MRA of the brain.
,
1992,
Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[6]
T. Chenevert,et al.
Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches.
,
1995,
Radiology.
[7]
P Schmalbrock,et al.
Normal venous anatomy of the brain: demonstration with gadopentetate dimeglumine in enhanced 3-D MR angiography.
,
1990,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[8]
M. Prince.
Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography.
,
1990,
Radiology.
[9]
R. Edelman,et al.
Perioperative imaging strategies for carotid endarterectomy. An analysis of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in symptomatic patients.
,
1995,
JAMA.