supplemented with two different forms of vitamin D Reproductive performance and bone status markers of gilts and lactating sows

In swine nutrition, little is known about the vitamin D requirements for reproductive processes and bone health. Consequently, the vitamin D recommendation for sows during gestation and lactation is not based on scientific reports. The current study was undertaken to obtain information on the dose-response pattern of 2 vitamin D sources, the commonly used cholecalciferol, called vitamin D3, and a newly developed Hy·D product (25-hydroxycholecalciferol). In Exp. 1, a total of 160 gilts were randomly assigned from the first estrus until d 28 of gestation to dietary treatments containing 4 concentrations of 1 of the 2 different vitamin D sources [200, 800, 1,400, and 2,000 IU/kg of vitamin D from cholecalciferol or corresponding doses of 5, 20, 35, and 50 μg/kg of feed from 25(OH)D3 (Hy·D)]. In a concurrent experiment, the same 8 dietary treatments were provided to 160 multiparous sows from the first day of mating until weaning. Plasma concentrations of 25(OH)D3 were influenced by a dose × form interaction (P < 0.001); furthermore, plasma 25(OH)D3 concentrations were influenced by the lactation state of the sows. Irrespective of the dietary dose and form of vitamin D provided to the sows, very little vitamin D was transferred to the progeny. Reproductive performance was not influenced by dietary vitamin D treatments, except for a decreased number of stillborn piglets (P = 0.03, SE = 0.40) with the larger doses of vitamin D (1,400 and 2,000 IU of vitamin D, resulting in 1.17 and 1.13 stillborn piglets per litter, respectively) compared with the smaller doses of vitamin D (200 and 800 IU of vitamin D, resulting in 1.98 and 1.99 stillborn piglets per litter, respectively). In the gilt trial, the ultimate strength of the bones (P = 0.01) and their content of ash (P = 0.02) were greater when vitamin D3 was supplemented in doses larger than 800 IU, compared with the same amount of Hy·D supplementation. In the sow experiment, lactation day (P < 0.001), rather than dietary vitamin D, influenced the concentrations of osteocalcin and Ca as well as the activities of total alkaline phosphatase and bone alkaline phosphatase in plasma. Age of the suckling piglets affected their plasma bone health markers. In conclusion, at doses greater than 200 IU, Hy·D was more bioavailable than vitamin D3 and, as such, could be considered an equivalent or even more advantageous source of vitamin D. In addition, a dietary dose of approximately 1,400 IU of vitamin D is recommended for reproducing swine. Irrespective of the dietary dose and form of vitamin D provided to the sows, very little vitamin D was transferred to the progeny.

[1]  S. K. Jensen,et al.  Supplementing dairy steers and organically managed dairy cows with synthetic vitamin D3 is unnecessary at pasture during exposure to summer sunlight. , 2009, The Journal of dairy research.

[2]  C. Kovacs Vitamin D in pregnancy and lactation: maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes from human and animal studies. , 2008, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[3]  F. Lampreave,et al.  Major plasma proteins in pig serum during postnatal development. , 2005, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[4]  J. Risteli,et al.  Influence of phytase added to a vegetarian diet on bone metabolism in pregnant and lactating sows. , 2005, Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition.

[5]  W. F. Owsley,et al.  Improving pork quality by feeding supranutritional concentrations of vitamin D3. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[6]  F. Pompei,et al.  Maternal-conceptus cross talk--a review. , 2003, Placenta.

[7]  M. Holick,et al.  Human serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol response to extended oral dosing with cholecalciferol. , 2003, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[8]  R. Pandey,et al.  Vitamin D: Non-skeletal actions and effects on growth , 1999 .

[9]  D. Mahan,et al.  Vitamin and mineral transfer during fetal development and the early postnatal period in pigs. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[10]  S. Boisen,et al.  Prediction of the apparent ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids in feedstuffs and feed mixtures for pigs by in vitro analyses , 1995 .

[11]  R. Friendship,et al.  Hematology and biochemistry reference values for Ontario swine. , 1984, Canadian journal of comparative medicine : Revue canadienne de medecine comparee.

[12]  J. Goff,et al.  Effect of sow vitamin D status at parturition on the vitamin D status of neonatal piglets. , 1984, The Journal of nutrition.

[13]  D. Noff,et al.  Absorption and excretion of cholecalciferol and of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol and metabolites in birds. , 1980, The Journal of nutrition.

[14]  H. DeLuca,et al.  Effect of vitamin D deficiency on fertility and reproductive capacity in the female rat. , 1980, The Journal of nutrition.

[15]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[16]  Intakes for Calcium , Phosphorus , Magnesium , Vitamin D , and Fluoride , 1974 .

[17]  C. B. Stuffins The determination of phosphate and calcium in feeding stuffs. , 1967, The Analyst.