Low-dose lung CT processing using weighted intensity averaging over large-scale neighborhoods

The aim of the proposed work is to improve low-dose lung CT (LDCT) screening using the processing of weighted intensity averaging over large-scale neighborhoods (WIA-LN). Both current and voltage reductions were considered for LDCT imaging. In the WIA-LN method, the processed pixel intensities are calculated by weighted averaging intensities among a large neighboring region. The weights are determined by the inter-similarity of the surrounding textures. A compute unified device architecture based parallelization was applied to accelerate the implementation. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed processing, low-dose lung CT images were obtained under both 75 % reduced tube current and 33.3 % reduced tube voltage condition respectively from a 16 detector rows Siemens CT. The standard routine standard-dose CT images were also collected as the reference images. In addition to clinical data from patients, an anthropomorphic lung phantom was also used in the study. Visual comparison and statistical qualitative analysis of image quality scores on the datasets are made in validation. Compared to the original LDCT images, improved visual and qualitative performance can be observed for the processed images. Statistically significant improvement of noise/artifacts suppression and nodule structure enhancement are achieved by using the proposed method (P < 0.05). The proposed method is capable of providing LDCT images under significantly reduced tube current and voltage settings in low-dose condition. Quality of the processed images was assessed by radiology specialists. Parallelization based algorithm optimization was also performed to increase the clinical applicability of the proposed processing.

[1]  Huazhong Shu,et al.  Artifact Suppressed Dictionary Learning for Low-Dose CT Image Processing , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Dag Rune Olsen,et al.  Improved image quality of low‐dose thoracic CT examinations with a new postprocessing software† , 2010, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[3]  Wufan Chen,et al.  Improving low-dose X-ray CT images by Weighted Intensity Averaging over Large-scale Neighborhoods , 2010, 2010 International Conference of Medical Image Analysis and Clinical Application.

[4]  Qianjin Feng,et al.  Improving low-dose abdominal CT images by Weighted Intensity Averaging over Large-scale Neighborhoods. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[5]  M. Kalra,et al.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.

[6]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Can noise reduction filters improve low-radiation-dose chest CT images? Pilot study. , 2003, Radiology.

[7]  G. McVey,et al.  Screening for lung cancer using low dose CT scanning: results of 2 year follow up , 2005, Thorax.

[8]  J. Paul,et al.  Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. , 2004, Radiology.

[9]  Ke Li,et al.  Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems: experimental assessment of noise performance. , 2014, Medical physics.

[10]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Guang-Hong Chen,et al.  Correlation between human observer performance and model observer performance in differential phase contrast CT. , 2013, Medical physics.

[12]  Magnus Båth,et al.  ViewDEX 2.0: a Java-based DICOM-compatible software for observer performance studies , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Kavita Garg,et al.  Lung cancer: interobserver agreement on interpretation of pulmonary findings at low-dose CT screening. , 2008, Radiology.

[14]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  Local noise weighted filtering for emphysema scoring of low-dose CT images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  G. McVey,et al.  Screening for lung cancer using low dose CT scanning: results of 2 year follow up , 2005, Thorax.

[17]  Hiroto Hatabu,et al.  Use of 3D adaptive raw-data filter in CT of the lung: effect on radiation dose reduction. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Christine Toumoulin,et al.  Thoracic low-dose CT image processing using an artifact suppressed large-scale nonlocal means , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Chronic Disease Division Cancer facts and figures , 2010 .

[20]  D. DeLong,et al.  Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques. , 2003, Radiology.

[21]  Zhengrong Liang,et al.  Adaptive-weighted total variation minimization for sparse data toward low-dose x-ray computed tomography image reconstruction , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  J. Hsieh Adaptive streak artifact reduction in computed tomography resulting from excessive x-ray photon noise. , 1998, Medical physics.

[24]  Jean-Louis Coatrieux,et al.  Radiation dose reduction with dictionary learning based processing for head CT , 2014, Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[25]  K S Lee,et al.  Low-Dose, Volumetric Helical CT: Image Quality, Radiation Dose, and Usefulness for Evaluation of Bronchiectasis , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[26]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  U. G. Dailey Cancer,Facts and Figures about. , 2022, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[28]  U. Nyman,et al.  Patient‐circumference‐adapted dose regulation in body computed tomography. a practical and flexible formula , 2005, Acta radiologica.