Environmental impacts of biogas deployment - Part I: Life cycle inventory for evaluation of production process emissions to air.

Abstract A Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) was developed to identify the unit processes in the life-cycle of biogas production and utilization offering the greatest opportunities for emission to air reduction, hence potential for environmental improvement. The systems investigated included single feedstock digestion and multiple feedstock co-digestion, small ( el ) and large-scale (≥500 kW el ) biogas plants, and selected biogas utilization pathways and digestate management options. Analysis was performed in accordance with ISO 14040 and 14044 standards, using SimaPro 7.2 software and Ecoinvent ® v2.1 database. The analysis is based on published data considering primarily conditions for Germany. Results indicated significant variation of emission levels for all unit processes related to biogas production and utilization. Emissions from the feedstock supply logistics were highly influenced by the origin of feedstock used. For example, the fossil fuel related carbon dioxide (CO 2,fossil ) emissions associated with feedstock supply were over 50 times higher for Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) compared to cattle manure. The higher value for MSW was associated with the requisite collection, transport and pre-treatment, whereas only transportation was required for cattle manure. Emissions from unit processes in biogas plant operation and biogas utilization depended on combined efficiency of energy generation (electricity and thermal), potential substitution of fossil fuels with biogas and utilization of the heat by-product of electricity generation. For example, the results indicated that upgrading of biogas to biomethane, with almost 100% conversion efficiency, caused 6 times less non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) emissions if plant heating was supplied from coupled small-scale CHP unit as opposed to heating with natural gas. Harnessing of the residual biogas from digestate storage areas was estimated to reduce methane emission by a factor up to 14. Overall, this study provides basic data required for identification and mitigation of emission ‘hot-spots’ in biogas production and utilization, including the evaluation of environmental and public health impacts of biogas technology options by attributional Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology.

[1]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems - A LCA case study , 2010 .

[2]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[3]  I. M. Scotford,et al.  Environmental Benefits of Livestock Manure Management Practices and Technology by Life Cycle Assessment , 2003 .

[4]  S. Ishikawa,et al.  Evaluation of a biogas plant from life cycle assessment (LCA) , 2006 .

[5]  Per Christensen,et al.  LCA of comprehensive pig manure management incorporating integrated technology systems , 2010 .

[6]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste—part 1: general methodology and results , 2005 .

[7]  Enrico Benetto,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of biogas production by monofermentation of energy crops and injection into the natural gas grid. , 2010 .

[8]  Betina Dimaranan,et al.  Global trade and environmental impact study of the EU biofuels mandate. , 2010 .

[9]  P Mostbauer,et al.  Climate balance of biogas upgrading systems. , 2010, Waste management.

[10]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part I: Fuel-cycle emissions , 2006 .

[11]  Joachim Kilian Hartmann,et al.  Life-cycle-assessment of industrial scale biogas plants , 2006 .

[12]  Francis Meunier,et al.  Environmental assessment of biogas co- or tri-generation units by life cycle analysis methodology , 2005 .

[13]  G. d'Imporzano,et al.  Substituting energy crops with organic wastes and agro-industrial residues for biogas production. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  Shane Ward,et al.  Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways , 2010 .

[15]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Life Cycle Inventories of Agricultural Production Systems , 2007 .

[16]  Martina Poeschl,et al.  Environmental impacts of biogas deployment – Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways , 2012 .

[17]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[18]  J. Holm‐Nielsen,et al.  The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[19]  Jerry D. Murphy,et al.  What is the energy balance of grass biomethane in Ireland and other temperate northern European climates , 2009 .

[20]  G. Psacharopoulos.  Overview and methodology , 1991 .

[21]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance , 2010 .

[22]  Varun,et al.  LCA of renewable energy for electricity generation systems—A review , 2009 .

[23]  S. Ward,et al.  Prospects for expanded utilization of biogas in Germany , 2010 .

[24]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of four alternatives for using by-products of cane sugar production. , 2009 .

[25]  Vincent R. Gray.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .