Parameter estimation in induction motors: a comparison between the PE and the TS paradigm

Abstract In this paper, we consider the problem of estimating unknown parameters of the model of an induction motor in a sensorless environment. A common practice consists in performing estimation through a series of bench tests, by letting the motor operate in steady-state. This way of proceeding, however, does not take into account the high sensitivity of some parameters to the motor operating condition. The issue, then, is to set-up an automatic estimator, able to to supply reliable estimates of the parameters from measurements taken from the actual functioning of the motor. Two different estimation paradigms are compared, namely the Prediction Error (PE) paradigm, which has become a standard in the practice of system identification, and the recently introduced Two-Stage (TS) paradigm. Advantages and drawbacks of such methods in the context of induction motors are spotted out by means of simulation experiments. It turns out that the TS method may offer a valid alternative to the PE method.

[1]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[2]  Cristiano Maria Verrelli,et al.  An adaptive tracking control from current measurements for induction motors with uncertain load torque and rotor resistance , 2008, Autom..

[3]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  Numerical Identification of Linear Dynamic Systems from Normal Operating Records , 1965 .

[4]  T. Bohlin On the problem of ambiguities in maximum likelihood identification , 1971 .

[5]  Sang-Hoon Lee,et al.  An online identification method for both stator-and rotor resistances of induction motors without rotational transducers , 2000, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[6]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[7]  Darren M. Dawson,et al.  Sensorless rotor velocity tracking control for induction motors , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[8]  R. Marino,et al.  Adaptive input-output linearizing control of induction motors , 1993, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[9]  R. Tempo,et al.  Randomized Algorithms for Analysis and Control of Uncertain Systems , 2004 .

[10]  Sergio Bittanti,et al.  Revisiting the basic issue of parameter estimation in system identification - a new approach for multi-value estimation , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[11]  Li-Chen Fu,et al.  Non-linear sensorless indirect adaptive speed control of induction motor with unknown rotor resistance and load , 2000 .

[12]  Werner Leonhard,et al.  Control of Electrical Drives , 1990 .

[13]  Sergio Bittanti,et al.  Estimation of white-box model parameters via artificial data generation: a two stage approach , 2008 .

[14]  Cristiano Maria Verrelli,et al.  A global tracking control for speed-sensorless induction motors , 2004, Autom..

[15]  Torsten P. Bohlin,et al.  Practical Grey-box Process Identification: Theory and Applications , 2006 .

[16]  Cristiano Maria Verrelli,et al.  Nonlinear tracking control for sensorless induction motors , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[17]  D. Q. Mayne Parameter estimation , 1966, Autom..

[18]  T. Söderström On the uniqueness of maximum likelihood identification , 1975, Autom..

[19]  Paul C. Krause,et al.  Analysis of electric machinery , 1987 .

[20]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Decentralized Control , 2018, The Control Systems Handbook.