Interlaboratory Study to Evaluate a Testing Protocol for the Safety of Food Packaging Coatings

According to European regulations, migration from food packaging must be safe. However, currently, there is no consensus on how to evaluate its safety, especially for non-intentionally added substances (NIAS). The intensive and laborious approach, involving identification and then quantification of all migrating substances followed by a toxicological evaluation, is not practical or feasible. In alignment with the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) and the European Union (EU) guidelines on packaging materials, efforts are focused on combining data from analytics, bioassays and in silico toxicology approaches for the risk assessment of packaging materials. Advancement of non-targeted screening approaches using both analytical methods and in vitro bioassays is key. A protocol was developed for the chemical and biological screening of migrants from coated metal packaging materials. This protocol includes guidance on sample preparation, migrant simulation, chemical analysis using liquid chromatography (LC-MS) and validated bioassays covering endocrine activity, genotoxicity and metabolism-related targets. An inter-laboratory study was set-up to evaluate the consistency in biological activity and analytical results generated between three independent laboratories applying the developed protocol and guidance. Coated packaging metal panels were used in this case study. In general, the inter-laboratory chemical analysis and bioassay results displayed acceptable consistency between laboratories, but technical differences led to different data interpretations (e.g., cytotoxicity, cell passages, chemical analysis). The study observations with the greatest impact on the quality of the data and ultimately resulting in discrepancies in the results are given and suggestions for improvement of the protocol are made (e.g., sample preparation, chemical analysis approaches). Finally, there was agreement on the need for an aligned protocol to be utilized by qualified laboratories for chemical and biological analyses, following best practices and guidance for packaging safety assessment of intentionally added substances (IAS) and NIAS to avoid inconsistency in data and the final interpretation.

[1]  B. Schilter,et al.  Effect-detection by planar SOS-Umu-C genotoxicity bioassay and chemical identification of genotoxins in packaging migrates, proven by microtiter plate assays SOS-Umu-C and Ames-MPF , 2022, Food Control.

[2]  G. Morlock,et al.  Incorporation of Metabolic Activation in the HPTLC-SOS-Umu-C Bioassay to Detect Low Levels of Genotoxic Chemicals in Food Contact Materials , 2022, Toxics.

[3]  S. Bourdoux,et al.  Guidance in selecting analytical techniques for identification and quantification of non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) in food contact materials (FCMS) , 2022, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[4]  G. Morlock,et al.  Detection of low levels of genotoxic compounds in food contact materials using an alternative HPTLC-SOS-Umu-C assay. , 2020, ALTEX.

[5]  Test No. 458: Stably Transfected Human Androgen Receptor Transcriptional Activation Assay for Detection of Androgenic Agonist and Antagonist Activity of Chemicals , 2020, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4.

[6]  José Manuel Barat Baviera,et al.  Review and priority setting for substances that are listed without a specific migration limit in Table 1 of Annex 1 of Regulation 10/2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food , 2020, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[7]  Alan Boobis,et al.  Value and limitation of in vitro bioassays to support the application of the threshold of toxicological concern to prioritise unidentified chemicals in food contact materials , 2019, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[8]  Juan Manuel Parra Morte,et al.  Genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures , 2018, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[9]  B. Schilter,et al.  Differentiating true androgen receptor inhibition from cytotoxicity-mediated reduction of reporter-gene transactivation in-vitro. , 2017, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[10]  Julien Veyrand,et al.  Integrating bioassays and analytical chemistry as an improved approach to support safety assessment of food contact materials , 2017, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[11]  Flavourings.  Recent developments in the risk assessment of chemicals in food and their potential impact on the safety assessment of substances used in food contact materials , 2016 .

[12]  Aldert H Piersma,et al.  Evaluation of an alternative in vitro test battery for detecting reproductive toxicants in a grouping context. , 2015, Reproductive toxicology.

[13]  H. Noteborn,et al.  A novel safety assessment strategy applied to non-selective extracts. , 2015, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[14]  S. Koster,et al.  GUIDANCE ON BEST PRACTICES ON THE RISK ASSESSMENT OF NON-INTENTIONALLY ADDED SUBSTANCES (NIAS) IN FOOD CONTACT MATERIALS AND ARTICLES , 2015 .

[15]  B. Muilwijk,et al.  A novel safety assessment strategy for non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) in carton food contact materials , 2014, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[16]  Richard M Walmsley,et al.  Development of a High-Throughput Gaussia Luciferase Reporter Assay for the Activation of the GADD45a Gene by Mutagens, Promutagens, Clastogens, and Aneugens , 2012, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[17]  Elke Richling,et al.  Application of the TTC concept to unknown substances found in analysis of foods. , 2011, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[18]  C. Bolognesi,et al.  Scientific opinion on genotoxicity testing strategies applicable to food and 3 feed safety assessment , 2011 .

[19]  M. Andersson,et al.  Test procedures for obtaining representative extracts suitable for reliable in vitro toxicity assessment of paper and board intended for food contact , 2010, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[20]  M. Andersson,et al.  Safety evaluation of food contact paper and board using chemical tests and in vitro bioassays: role of known and unknown substances , 2010, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[21]  L Castle,et al.  The BIOSAFEPAPER project for in vitro toxicity assessments: preparation, detailed chemical characterisation and testing of extracts from paper and board samples. , 2008, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[22]  M. Biedermann,et al.  Food Contamination with Organic Materials in Perspective: Packaging Materials as the Largest and Least Controlled Source? A View Focusing on the European Situation , 2006, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[23]  Abraham Brouwer,et al.  Development of androgen- and estrogen-responsive bioassays, members of a panel of human cell line-based highly selective steroid-responsive bioassays. , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[24]  R. Kroes.  Structure-Based Thresholds of Toxicological Concern (TTC): Guidance for Application to Substances Present at Low Levels in the Diet , 2004, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[25]  Shin-ichi Sakai,et al.  Brominated dioxin-like compounds: in vitro assessment in comparison to classical dioxin-like compounds and other polyaromatic compounds. , 2003, Environment international.

[26]  K. Grob,et al.  The migration from the internal coatings of food cans; summary of the findings and call for more effective regulation of polymers in contact with foods: a review. , 1999, Food additives and contaminants.

[27]  A. Bailey,et al.  A tiered approach to threshold of regulation. , 1999, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[28]  J. J. Bonin,et al.  Risk Assessment in Setting National Priorities , 1989, Advances in Risk Analysis.