Markov chains for error accumulation in quantum circuits

We study a model for the accumulation of errors in multi-qubit quantum computations, as well as a model describing continuous errors accumulating in a single qubit. By modeling the error process in a quantum computation using two coupled Markov chains, we are able to capture a weak form of time-dependency between errors in the past and future. By subsequently using techniques from the field of discrete probability theory, we calculate the probability that error measures such as the fidelity and trace distance exceed a threshold analytically. The formulae cover fairly generic error distributions, cover multi-qubit scenarios, and are applicable to e.g. the randomized benchmarking protocol. To combat the numerical challenge that may occur when evaluating our expressions, we additionally provide an analytical bound on the error probabilities that is of lower numerical complexity, and we also discuss a state space reduction that occurs for stabilizer circuits. Finally, taking inspiration from the field of operations research, we illustrate how our expressions can be used to e.g. decide how many gates one can apply before too many errors accumulate with high probability, and how one can lower the rate of error accumulation in existing circuits through simulated annealing.

[1]  Paul H. Roberts,et al.  Random walk on a sphere and on a Riemannian manifold , 1960, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  Milton Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables , 1964 .

[3]  G. Arfken Mathematical Methods for Physicists , 1967 .

[4]  M. Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions, with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables , 1966 .

[5]  C. Grosjean Theory of recursive generation of systems of orthogonal polynomials: An illustrative example , 1985 .

[6]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[7]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[8]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[9]  Martin L. Puterman,et al.  Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming , 1994 .

[10]  Daniel Gottesman,et al.  Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction , 1997, quant-ph/9705052.

[11]  J. Preskill Quantum computing: pro and con , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  D. Gottesman The Heisenberg Representation of Quantum Computers , 1998, quant-ph/9807006.

[13]  Ruskai Pauli exchange errors in quantum computation , 1999, Physical review letters.

[14]  A. Fowler,et al.  Scalability of Shor’s algorithm with a limited set of rotation gates , 2003, quant-ph/0306018.

[15]  Scott Aaronson,et al.  Improved Simulation of Stabilizer Circuits , 2004, ArXiv.

[16]  H. Gutmann Description and control of decoherence in quantum bit systems , 2005 .

[17]  E. Knill Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices , 2005, Nature.

[18]  M. Anthony,et al.  Advanced linear algebra , 2006 .

[19]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[20]  Philippe Flajolet,et al.  Analytic Combinatorics , 2009 .

[21]  Joseph Emerson,et al.  Scalable and robust randomized benchmarking of quantum processes. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[22]  David G. Cory,et al.  Modeling Quantum Noise for efficient testing of fault-tolerant circuits , 2012, 1206.5407.

[23]  Kenneth R. Brown,et al.  Approximation of realistic errors by Clifford channels and Pauli measurements , 2012, 1207.0046.

[24]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Investigating the limits of randomized benchmarking protocols , 2013, 1308.2928.

[25]  John A. Smolin,et al.  How to efficiently select an arbitrary Clifford group element , 2014, 1406.2170.

[26]  P. V. Mieghem,et al.  Performance Analysis of Complex Networks and Systems , 2014 .

[27]  Igor L. Markov,et al.  On the geometry of stabilizer states , 2014, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[28]  M Saffman,et al.  Randomized benchmarking of single-qubit gates in a 2D array of neutral-atom qubits. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[29]  K. Fujii Stabilizer Formalism and Its Applications , 2015 .

[30]  Joel J. Wallman,et al.  Robust Characterization of Loss Rates. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[31]  Peter Selinger,et al.  Generators and relations for n-qubit Clifford operators , 2013, Log. Methods Comput. Sci..

[32]  Daniel Gottesman,et al.  Quantum computing: Efficient fault tolerance , 2016, Nature.

[33]  M. A. Rol,et al.  Repeated quantum error correction on a continuously encoded qubit by real-time feedback , 2015, Nature Communications.

[34]  Andrea Klug,et al.  Bells Theorem Quantum Theory And Conceptions Of The Universe , 2016 .

[35]  Kenneth R. Brown,et al.  Analytical error analysis of Clifford gates by the fault-path tracer method , 2015, Quantum Inf. Process..

[36]  Michael J. Biercuk,et al.  Effect of noise correlations on randomized benchmarking , 2015, 1504.05307.

[37]  Pierre Brémaud Discrete Probability Models and Methods , 2017 .

[38]  Joel J. Wallman,et al.  Randomized benchmarking with gate-dependent noise , 2017, 1703.09835.

[39]  Bryan H. Fong,et al.  Randomized Benchmarking, Correlated Noise, and Ising Models , 2017, 1703.09747.

[40]  Caroline Figgatt,et al.  Fault-tolerant quantum error detection , 2016, Science Advances.

[41]  Sergey Bravyi,et al.  Correcting coherent errors with surface codes , 2017, npj Quantum Information.

[42]  Daniel Stilck Francca,et al.  Approximate randomized benchmarking for finite groups , 2018, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical.

[43]  Bryan Eastin,et al.  Randomized benchmarking with restricted gate sets , 2018, Physical Review A.

[44]  Jay M. Gambetta,et al.  Quantification and characterization of leakage errors , 2017, 1704.03081.

[45]  Zachary Dutton,et al.  Modeling coherent errors in quantum error correction , 2016, 1612.03908.

[46]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Quantum optimization using variational algorithms on near-term quantum devices , 2017, Quantum Science and Technology.

[47]  Steven Flammia,et al.  Performance of quantum error correction with coherent errors , 2018, Physical Review A.

[48]  Steven T. Flammia,et al.  Statistical analysis of randomized benchmarking , 2019, Physical Review A.