Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance among Clinical Isolates of Bacteroides fragilis Group in Canada in 2010-2011: CANWARD Surveillance Study

ABSTRACT Clinical isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group (n = 387) were collected from patients attending nine Canadian hospitals in 2010-2011 and tested for susceptibility to 10 antimicrobial agents using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method. B. fragilis (59.9%), Bacteroides ovatus (16.3%), and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (12.7%) accounted for ∼90% of isolates collected. Overall rates of percent susceptibility were as follows: 99.7%, metronidazole; 99.5%, piperacillin-tazobactam; 99.2%, imipenem; 97.7%, ertapenem; 92.0%, doripenem; 87.3%, amoxicillin-clavulanate; 80.9%, tigecycline; 65.9%, cefoxitin; 55.6%, moxifloxacin; and 52.2%, clindamycin. Percent susceptibility to cefoxitin, clindamycin, and moxifloxacin was lowest for B. thetaiotaomicron (n = 49, 24.5%), Parabacteroides distasonis/P. merdae (n = 11, 9.1%), and B. ovatus (n = 63, 31.8%), respectively. One isolate (B. thetaiotaomicron) was resistant to metronidazole, and two isolates (both B. fragilis) were resistant to both piperacillin-tazobactam and imipenem. Since the last published surveillance study describing Canadian isolates of B. fragilis group almost 20 years ago (A.-M. Bourgault et al., Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:343–347, 1992), rates of resistance have increased for amoxicillin-clavulanate, from 0.8% (1992) to 6.2% (2010-2011), and for clindamycin, from 9% (1992) to 34.1% (2010-2011).

[1]  E. Goldstein,et al.  National hospital survey of anaerobic culture and susceptibility methods: III. , 2008, Anaerobe.

[2]  E. Goldstein,et al.  National hospital survey of anaerobic culture and susceptibility testing methods: results and recommendations for improvement , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[3]  N. V. Jacobus,et al.  National Survey on the Susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis Group: Report and Analysis of Trends in the United States from 1997 to 2004 , 2007, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[4]  E. Goldstein,et al.  Resistance Trends in Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Anaerobic Bacteria, Part I , 2011 .

[5]  Clsi Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twenty-First Informational Supplement , 2010 .

[6]  D. Snydman,et al.  Lessons learned from the anaerobe survey: historical perspective and review of the most recent data (2005-2007). , 2010, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[7]  U. Pennsylvania,et al.  Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute , 2019, Springer Reference Medizin.

[8]  S. Jenkins,et al.  Methods for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria ; Approved Standard — Seventh Edition , 2003 .

[9]  E. Urbán,et al.  Molecular characterization of imipenem-resistant, cfiA-positive Bacteroides fragilis isolates from the USA, Hungary and Kuwait. , 2004, Journal of medical microbiology.

[10]  E. Bruck,et al.  National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. , 1980, Pediatrics.

[11]  Clinical,et al.  Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Eighteenth Informational Supplement , 2008 .

[12]  D. Low,et al.  Survey of Bacteroides fragilis group susceptibility patterns in Canada , 1992, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[13]  D. Livermore Doripenem: antimicrobial profile and clinical potential. , 2009, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[14]  D. Snydman,et al.  Update on resistance of Bacteroides fragilis group and related species with special attention to carbapenems 2006-2009. , 2011, Anaerobe.

[15]  N. Jacobus,et al.  Susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States: analysis by site of isolation , 1988, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[16]  J. Johnson Taxonomy of the Bacteroides I. Deoxyribonucleic Acid Homologies Among Bacteroides fragilis and Other Saccharolytic Bacteroides Species , 1978 .

[17]  D. Yong,et al.  New cfiA variant and novel insertion sequence elements in carbapenem-resistant Bacteroides fragilis isolates from Korea. , 2010, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[18]  C. Liao,et al.  Increasing Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Clinically Important Anaerobes and Bacteroides fragilis Isolates Causing Nosocomial Infections: Emerging Resistance to Carbapenems , 2008, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[19]  G. Horsman,et al.  Survey of anaerobic susceptibility patterns in Canada , 1986, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[20]  D. Snydman,et al.  Antimicrobial resistance and clinical outcome of Bacteroides bacteremia: findings of a multicenter prospective observational trial. , 2000, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.