On the molecular basis for mechanotransduction.

Much is currently known about the signaling pathways that are excited when cells are subjected to a mechanical stimulus, yet we understand little of the process by which the mechanical perturbation is transformed into a biochemical signal. Numerous theories have been proposed, and each has merit. While cells may possess many different ways of responding to stress, the existence of a single unifying principle has much appeal. Here we propose the hypothesis that cells sense mechanical force through changes in protein conformation, leading to altered binding affinities of proteins, ultimately initiating an intracellular signaling cascade or producing changes in the proteins localized to regions of high stress. More generally, this represents an alternative to transmembrane signaling through receptor-ligand interactions providing the cell with a means of reacting to changes in its mechanical, as opposed to biochemical, environment. One example is presented showing how the binding affinity between the focal adhesion targeting domain of focal adhesion kinase and the LD motif of paxillin is influenced by externally applied force.

[1]  S. Smith,et al.  Folding-unfolding transitions in single titin molecules characterized with laser tweezers. , 1997, Science.

[2]  P. Davies,et al.  Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. , 1995, Physiological reviews.

[3]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Intracellular stress tomography reveals stress focusing and structural anisotropy in cytoskeleton of living cells. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[4]  M. Rief,et al.  Reversible unfolding of individual titin immunoglobulin domains by AFM. , 1997, Science.

[5]  M A Horton,et al.  Single integrin molecule adhesion forces in intact cells measured by atomic force microscopy. , 1999, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[6]  Dennis E Discher,et al.  Cooperativity in forced unfolding of tandem spectrin repeats. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[7]  R D Kamm,et al.  Force-induced focal adhesion translocation: effects of force amplitude and frequency. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[8]  E. Zamir,et al.  Components of cell-matrix adhesions. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[9]  R. Landesberg,et al.  Paracrine activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase in a simple in vitro model of wounded osteoblasts. , 2002, Bone.

[10]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-mediated Contractility Exposes a Cryptic Site in Fibronectin and Induces Fibronectin Matrix Assembly , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  Mariano Carrion-Vazquez,et al.  The mechanical hierarchies of fibronectin observed with single-molecule AFM. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Frederick Sachs,et al.  Energetic and Spatial Parameters for Gating of the Bacterial Large Conductance Mechanosensitive Channel, MscL , 1999, The Journal of general physiology.

[13]  P. McKeown-Longo,et al.  A novel role for the integrin-binding III-10 module in fibronectin matrix assembly , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  J. M. Broome,et al.  Paxillin binding is not the sole determinant of focal adhesion localization or dominant-negative activity of focal adhesion kinase/focal adhesion kinase-related nonkinase. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[15]  C. Turner,et al.  The paxillin LD motifs , 2002, FEBS letters.

[16]  R. Liddington,et al.  The focal adhesion targeting (FAT) region of focal adhesion kinase is a four-helix bundle that binds paxillin , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[17]  B. Geiger,et al.  Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix--cytoskeleton crosstalk. , 2001, Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology.

[18]  O. Hamill,et al.  Molecular basis of mechanotransduction in living cells. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[19]  K Schulten,et al.  Structural determinants of MscL gating studied by molecular dynamics simulations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[20]  R D Kamm,et al.  Force-induced unfolding of the focal adhesion targeting domain and the influence of paxillin binding. , 2004, Mechanics & chemistry of biosystems : MCB.

[21]  C F Dewey,et al.  The dynamic response of vascular endothelial cells to fluid shear stress. , 1981, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  Gang Bao,et al.  Mechanics of biomolecules , 2002 .

[23]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[24]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Talin1 is critical for force-dependent reinforcement of initial integrin–cytoskeleton bonds but not tyrosine kinase activation , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Force transduction by Triton cytoskeletons , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Exploring the Neighborhood Adhesion-Coupled Cell Mechanosensors , 2002, Cell.

[27]  A. Tedgui,et al.  Cellular mechanics and gene expression in blood vessels. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  P K Hansma,et al.  Stepwise unfolding of titin under force-clamp atomic force microscopy. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  D C Rees,et al.  Structure of the MscL homolog from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a gated mechanosensitive ion channel. , 1998, Science.

[30]  R. Merkel,et al.  Energy landscapes of receptor–ligand bonds explored with dynamic force spectroscopy , 1999, Nature.