Overview of laboratory data tools available in a single electronic medical record

Background: Laboratory data account for the bulk of data stored in any given electronic medical record (EMR). To best serve the user, electronic laboratory data needs to be flexible and customizable. Our aim was to determine the various ways in which laboratory data get utilized by clinicians in our health system′s EMR. Method: All electronic menus, tabs, flowsheets, notes and subsections within the EMR (Millennium v2007.13, Cerner Corporation, Kansas City, MO, US) were explored to determine how clinicians utilize discrete laboratory data. Results: Laboratory data in the EMR were utilized by clinicians in five distinct ways: within flowsheets, their personal inbox (EMR messaging), with decision support tools, in the health maintenance tool, and when incorporating laboratory data into their clinical notes and letters. Conclusions : Flexible electronic laboratory data in the EMR hava many advantages. Users can view, sort, pool, and appropriately route laboratory information to better support trend analyses, clinical decision making, and clinical charting. Laboratory data in the EMR can also be utilized to develop clinical decision support tools. Pathologists need to participate in the creation of these EMR tools in order to better support the appropriate utilization of laboratory information in the EMR.

[1]  M. Laposata,et al.  Evaluation of effectiveness of a computerized notification system for reporting critical values. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[2]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Medical laboratory informatics. , 2007, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[3]  Victor Brodsky,et al.  Laboratory Reports in the Electronic Medical Record , 2007 .

[4]  Alberto M Marchevsky,et al.  Evidence-based medicine, medical decision analysis, and pathology. , 2004, Human pathology.

[5]  Thomas D Koepsell,et al.  Providers' reactions to an automated health maintenance reminder system incorporated into the patient's electronic medical record. , 2003, The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice.

[6]  P. Frame,et al.  Automated health maintenance reminders: tools do not make a system. , 2003, The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice.

[7]  David W Bates,et al.  Linking laboratory and pharmacy: opportunities for reducing errors and improving care. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  G J Kuperman,et al.  Patient safety and computerized medication ordering at Brigham and Women's Hospital. , 2001, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[9]  K. Young,et al.  Informatics for Healthcare Professionals , 2000 .

[10]  L Gierl,et al.  Task-specific authoring functions for end-users in a hospital information system. , 1995, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[11]  Ann D Gaffey Communication and documentation considerations for electronic health records. , 2009, Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management.

[12]  W. DuMouchel,et al.  A Meta-analysis of l,6 Randomized Controlled Trials to Evaluate Computer-based Clinical Reminder Systems for Preventive Care in the Ambulatory Setting , 2000 .

[13]  J. Douglas,et al.  Healthcare informatics. , 1990, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.