Smart Cities, Big Data, and Communities: Reasoning From the Viewpoint of Attractors

In what sense is a city smart? There are established entities defining this rich area of cross-disciplinary studies, and they refer to social, technical, economic, and political factors that keep evolving, thus offering opportunities for constant refinement of the concept of smart city. The emerging properties are mostly contextual, and affect urban data types and their capacity to form complex information systems. A well-known problem in computational analysis is the integration of lot of generated data. The heterogeneity and diversity of smart city data sources suggest that a system’s approach could be ideal to assemble drivers of multiple forces and dynamics, suggesting adaptive solutions too. However, the nature of such systems is quite unpredictable and chaotic, leading to the natural aim of stabilizing them. Studies have proposed methods based on various criteria, say parametric, entropic, anthropic etc. As many factors and variables underlie the system’s drivers, attractors derived from dynamical systems are proposed to describe smart city contexts through the various interlinked big data and networks.

[1]  Christian Kuehn,et al.  Early warning signs for saddle-escape transitions in complex networks , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Bernd Resch,et al.  From Social Sensor Data to Collective Human Behaviour Patterns - Analysing and Visualising Spatio-Temporal Dynamics in Urban Environments , 2012 .

[3]  Romano Fistola Smart City: riflessioni sull'intelligenza urbana , 2013 .

[4]  F. Takens,et al.  On the nature of turbulence , 1971 .

[5]  L. Horwitz,et al.  BE A STRANGE ATTRACTOR ? , 2004 .

[6]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Generating Boolean networks with a prescribed attractor structure , 2005, Bioinform..

[7]  Alexander Zipf,et al.  Live Cities and Urban Services - A Multi-dimensional Stress Field between Technology, Innovation and Society , 2012 .

[8]  Stephen R. Marsland,et al.  Network parameters and heuristics in practice: a case study using the target set selection problem , 2014, J. Complex Networks.

[9]  Paolo Petrulli Città tra agglomerazione e disaggregazione , 2010 .

[10]  Alberto Magnaghi,et al.  The Urban Village: A Charter for Democracy and Local Self-Sustainable Development , 2005 .

[11]  Marc Barthelemy,et al.  Multiplex networks in metropolitan areas: generic features and local effects , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[12]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Resolution limit in community detection , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Hernán A. Makse,et al.  Influence maximization in complex networks through optimal percolation , 2015, Nature.

[14]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Community-Affiliation Graph Model for Overlapping Network Community Detection , 2012, 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining.

[15]  Richard S. Zemel,et al.  A Generative Model for Attractor Dynamics , 1999, NIPS.

[16]  Vasant Dhar,et al.  Data science and prediction , 2012, CACM.

[17]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Universality in network dynamics , 2013, Nature Physics.

[18]  Filippo Radicchi,et al.  A paradox in community detection , 2013, ArXiv.

[19]  P. Fusero,et al.  Urbanistica Parametrica: una nuova frontiera delle Smart Cities , 2013 .

[20]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[21]  Zbigniew Smoreda,et al.  The anatomy of urban social networks and its implications in the searchability problem , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Information diffusion and external influence in networks , 2012, KDD.

[23]  Romano Fistola,et al.  SMART CITY PLANNING: A SYSTEMIC APPROACH , 2013 .