Adaptive vs. Fixed Domain Support in the Context of Scripted Collaborative Learning

This study focuses on how to adaptively support small groups of students during a scripted collaborative activity. Forty (40) students collaborated remotely in dyads (in lab conditions) on a task structured by a collaboration script in the domain of multimedia learning. Half of the dyads (treatment group) were supported by a domain- specific adaptive intervention in the form of reminding prompts, while the rest of the dyads (control group) were supported by an informationally equivalent fixed form of support. Our main hypothesis was that the adaptive intervention would lead to better individual and group learning outcomes compared to the fixed one. Qualitative and quantitative analyses showed that (a) students in the treatment group outperformed those in the control group in domain knowledge acquisition, (b) dyads in the treatment group accomplished tasks more efficiently than the control dyads, and (c) dyads in the treatment group enacted more solution-convergent interactions than the control dyads. Overall, this study provides evidence that by implementing techniques of adaptive domain- specific support during a collaborative activity, instructors can substantially improve learning outcomes.

[1]  Chen-Chung Liu,et al.  An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[2]  N. Rummel,et al.  Learning to Collaborate: An Instructional Approach to Promoting Collaborative Problem Solving in Computer-Mediated Settings , 2005 .

[3]  Satinder P. Singh,et al.  Introduction , 2002, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[4]  Anastasios Karakostas,et al.  Adaptive and Intelligent Systems for Collaborative Learning Support: A Review of the Field , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[5]  Pierre Tchounikine,et al.  Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[6]  Judith Masthoff,et al.  Layered evaluation of interactive adaptive systems: framework and formative methods , 2010, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[7]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Tutorial Dialogue as Adaptive Collaborative Learning Support , 2007, AIED.

[8]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[9]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[10]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  A Research-Oriented Architecture for Providing Adaptive Collaborative Learning Support , 2008 .

[11]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  Supporting collaborative learning and problem-solving in a constraint-based CSCL environment for UML class diagrams , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[12]  R. Slavin.  Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. , 1996 .

[13]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  CTRL: A research framework for providing adaptive collaborative learning support , 2009, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[14]  Jim Hewitt.  Toward an Understanding of How Threads Die in Asynchronous Computer Conferences , 2005 .

[15]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  From Mirroring to Guiding: A Review of State of the Art Technology for Supporting Collaborative Learning , 2005, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[16]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Paradigms of shared knowledge , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[17]  Yoneo Yano,et al.  A collaborative learning environment based on intelligent agents , 1998 .

[18]  Davinia Hernández Leo,et al.  COLLAGE: A collaborative Learning Design editor based on patterns , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..