Brain Network Dynamics Adhere to a Power Law

The temporal dynamics of complex networks such as the Internet are characterized by a power scaling between the temporal mean and dispersion of signals at each network node. Here we tested the hypothesis that the temporal dynamics of the brain networks are characterized by a similar power law. This realization could be useful to assess the effects of randomness and external modulators on the brain network dynamics. Simulated data using a well-stablished random diffusion model allowed us to predict that the temporal dispersion of the amplitude of low frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and that of the local functional connectivity density (lFCD) scale with their temporal means. We tested this hypothesis in open-access resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging datasets from 66 healthy subjects. A robust power law emerged from the temporal dynamics of ALFF and lFCD metrics, which was insensitive to the methods used for the computation of the metrics. The scaling exponents (ALFF: 0.8 ± 0.1; lFCD: 1.1 ± 0.1; mean ± SD) decreased with age and varied significantly across brain regions; multimodal cortical areas exhibited lower scaling exponents, consistent with a stronger influence of external inputs, than limbic and subcortical regions, which exhibited higher scaling exponents, consistent with a stronger influence of internal randomness. Findings are consistent with the notion that external inputs govern neuronal communication in the brain and that their relative influence differs between brain regions. Further studies will assess the potential of this metric as biomarker to characterize neuropathology.

[1]  Kent A. Kiehl,et al.  A method for evaluating dynamic functional network connectivity and task-modulation: application to schizophrenia , 2010, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[2]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[3]  Dardo Tomasi,et al.  High-Resolution Functional Connectivity Density: Hub Locations, Sensitivity, Specificity, Reproducibility, and Reliability. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Response to Comment on "Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought" , 2007, Science.

[5]  Richard H. A. H. Jacobs,et al.  The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[6]  Catie Chang,et al.  Time–frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  Chaozhe Zhu,et al.  Amplitude of low frequency fluctuation within visual areas revealed by resting-state functional MRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[8]  J. Duyn,et al.  Time-varying functional network information extracted from brief instances of spontaneous brain activity , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Christian Windischberger,et al.  Toward discovery science of human brain function , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Stan B. Floresco,et al.  Cortico-limbic-striatal circuits subserving different forms of cost-benefit decision making , 2008, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[11]  Bernard Mazoyer,et al.  Patterns of hemodynamic low-frequency oscillations in the brain are modulated by the nature of free thought during rest , 2012, NeuroImage.

[12]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[13]  L. R. Taylor,et al.  Aggregation, Variance and the Mean , 1961, Nature.

[14]  J. Morton,et al.  Tracking the Brain's Functional Coupling Dynamics over Development , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Common intrinsic connectivity states among posteromedial cortex subdivisions: Insights from analysis of temporal dynamics , 2014, NeuroImage.

[16]  N. D. Volkow,et al.  Temporal Changes in Local Functional Connectivity Density Reflect the Temporal Variability of the Amplitude of Low Frequency Fluctuations in Gray Matter , 2016, PloS one.

[17]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[18]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[19]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[20]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[21]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Susan A. Sadek,et al.  A Shift to Randomness of Brain Oscillations in People with Autism , 2010, Biological Psychiatry.

[23]  M. A. de Menezes,et al.  Fluctuations in network dynamics. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[24]  Yee-Joon Kim,et al.  Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry , 2006, Vision Research.

[25]  M. Greicius,et al.  Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  Ludovica Griffanti,et al.  Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: Combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers , 2014, NeuroImage.

[27]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Brain connectivity networks in schizophrenia underlying resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2012, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[28]  V. Calhoun,et al.  The Chronnectome: Time-Varying Connectivity Networks as the Next Frontier in fMRI Data Discovery , 2014, Neuron.

[29]  Leonardo L. Gollo,et al.  Time-resolved resting-state brain networks , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Laura C. Buchanan,et al.  Tracking ongoing cognition in individuals using brief, whole-brain functional connectivity patterns , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  G. Cecchi,et al.  Scale-free brain functional networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[32]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  Willed action, free will, and the stochastic neurodynamics of decision-making , 2012, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[33]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[34]  Nora D. Volkow,et al.  Functional connectivity hubs in the human brain , 2011, NeuroImage.

[35]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  Steen Moeller,et al.  Pushing spatial and temporal resolution for functional and diffusion MRI in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[37]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[38]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Scale-Free Networks: A Decade and Beyond , 2009, Science.

[39]  N. Volkow,et al.  Functional connectivity density mapping , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic connectivity states estimated from resting fMRI Identify differences among Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[41]  Nora D. Volkow,et al.  Temporal Evolution of Brain Functional Connectivity Metrics: Could 7 Min of Rest be Enough? , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  P. Goldman-Rakic Topography of cognition: parallel distributed networks in primate association cortex. , 1988, Annual review of neuroscience.

[43]  N. Volkow,et al.  Aging and Functional Brain Networks , 2011, Molecular Psychiatry.

[44]  Anna S. Mitchell,et al.  The mediodorsal thalamus as a higher order thalamic relay nucleus important for learning and decision-making , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.