Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation.

OBJECTIVE Helical CT has become the preferred methodology for identifying urinary calculi. However, the ability to predict stone composition, which influences patient treatment, depends on the accurate measurement of the radiographic attenuation of stones. We studied the effects of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation width on the measurement of attenuation in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred twenty-seven human urinary calculi of known composition and size were scanned at 120 kVp, 240 mA, and a 1:1 pitch at different collimations. A model, based on the physics of helical CT, was used to predict the effect of scan collimation width and stone size on measured attenuation. RESULTS At a 1-mm collimation, stone groups could be differentiated by attenuation: the attenuation of uric acid was less than that of cystine or struvite, which overlapped; these were less than the attenuation of calcium oxalate monohydrate, which was in turn lower than that of brushite and hydroxyapatite, which overlapped and showed the highest values. At a wider collimation, attenuation was lower and the ability to differentiate stone composition was lost. Attenuation also decreased with smaller stones. At a 10-mm collimation, some uric acid stones (<approximately 6 mm) and other stones (< approximately 4 mm) had very low attenuation, so low that they could remain undetected on helical CT. The model predicted well the degree that attenuation was affected by stone size and collimation width. CONCLUSION Stone composition and stone size, relative to CT collimation, independently influenced CT attenuation. The effect of stone size and collimation generally conformed to the model's predictions. We determined that small stones with low attenuation can be overlooked on helical CT.

[1]  R. Zamenhof,et al.  Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by computerized tomography. , 1983, The Journal of urology.

[2]  M. Stoller,et al.  Imaging characteristics of indinavir calculi. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[3]  G. Steele,et al.  Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain: a replacement for excretory urography. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[4]  J. Lingeman,et al.  Correction of helical CT attenuation values with wide beam collimation: in vitro test with urinary calculi. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[5]  S. Yilmaz,et al.  Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi , 1999, European Radiology.

[6]  R C Smith,et al.  Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  R C Smith,et al.  The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[8]  R. Smith,et al.  Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. , 1997, Radiology.

[9]  F. G. Sommer,et al.  Accuracy of detection and measurement of renal calculi: in vitro comparison of three-dimensional spiral CT, radiography, and nephrotomography. , 1997, Radiology.

[10]  F. G. Sommer,et al.  Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: incidence of associated urinary tract findings. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  S. Mccarthy,et al.  Acute ureteral obstruction: value of secondary signs of helical unenhanced CT. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  G. Preminger,et al.  Unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[13]  R. Nelson,et al.  Urolithiasis: detection and management with unenhanced spiral CT--a urologic perspective. , 1998, Radiology.

[14]  B. Saltzman,et al.  Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[15]  A. Kawashima,et al.  Noncontrast helical CT for ureteral stones , 1998, World Journal of Urology.

[16]  G. Rubin,et al.  Helical CT of the urinary tract. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  F. G. Sommer,et al.  Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  C. Kane,et al.  Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain. , 1998, Urology.

[19]  R C Smith,et al.  Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. , 1995, Radiology.

[20]  W D Foley,et al.  Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  R. Smith,et al.  Noncontrast helical CT in the evaluation of acute flank pain , 1998, Abdominal Imaging.

[22]  N. Dalrymple,et al.  Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. , 2001, Urology.

[23]  S H Fox,et al.  The effect of helical pitch and beam collimation on the lesion contrast and slice profile in helical CT imaging. , 1996, Medical physics.

[24]  F. G. Sommer,et al.  Unenhanced helical CT for suspected renal colic. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  E. S. Amis,et al.  Computed tomographic analysis of urinary calculi. , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  S. Sourtzis,et al.  Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  F. Richard,et al.  Diagnostic value of CT numbers in pelvocalyceal filling defects. , 1982, Radiology.