THE EFFECTS OF SPONSOR RELEVANCE ON CONSUMER REACTIONS TO INTERNET SPONSORSHIPS

This study reports the results of two experiments that were conducted to examine the effects of Internet sponsorships and the role of sponsor relevance in these effects. Experiment 1 used a group of college students and Experiment 2 replicated the first experiment using a group of nonstudent adults. Both experiments examined sponsorship linkage as a means of structuring Internet sponsorships that impacts sponsor recall, attitude toward the sponsor, and purchase intentions. Findings revealed that relevant Internet sponsors were more persuasive than irrelevant Internet sponsors for the three dependent variables. Two context variables, Web site credibility and intent to return to the site, moderated the linkage factor on sponsor evaluations in that higher levels of the context variables translated to more positive evaluations for relevant sponsors.

[1]  D. H. Dean,et al.  Associating the Corporation with a Charitable Event Through Sponsorship: Measuring the Effects on Corporate Community Relations , 2002 .

[2]  T. Bettina Cornwell,et al.  The Value of Winning in Motorsports: Sponsorship-linked Marketing , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[3]  R. Madrigal The Influence of Social Alliances with Sports Teams on Intentions to Purchase Corporate Sponsors' Products , 2000 .

[4]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  An Introduction To Statistical Concepts For Education And Behavioral Sciences , 2000 .

[5]  Gita Venkataramani Johar,et al.  Relatedness, Prominence, and Constructive Sponsor Identification , 1999 .

[6]  J. Eaton,et al.  Building Brand Image Through Event Sponsorship: The Role of Image Transfer , 1999 .

[7]  D. H. Dean Brand Endorsement, Popularity, and Event Sponsorship as Advertising Cues Affecting Consumer Pre-Purchase Attitudes , 1999 .

[8]  Stephen R. McDaniel An investigation of match‐up effects in sport sponsorship advertising: The implications of consumer advertising schemas , 1999 .

[9]  Isabelle Maignan,et al.  An International Review of Sponsorship Research , 1998 .

[10]  Myung-Soo Lee,et al.  Attitudinal constructs towards sponsorship , 1997 .

[11]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Why Media Matter: Toward a Richer Understanding of Consumers' Relationships with Advertising and Mass Media , 1997 .

[12]  Jim Crimmins,et al.  Sponsorship: from management ego trip to marketing success , 1996 .

[13]  H. Stipp The impact of Olympic sponsorship on corporate image , 1996 .

[14]  Eric Haley,et al.  Exploring the Construct of Organization as Source: Consumers' Understandings of Organizational Sponsorship of Advocacy Advertising , 1996 .

[15]  A. d’Astous,et al.  Consumer evaluations of sponsorship programmes , 1995 .

[16]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd ed. , 1995 .

[17]  Colin McDonald,et al.  Sponsorship and the Image of the Sponsor , 1991 .

[18]  T. Meenaghan,et al.  The Role of Sponsorship in the Marketing Communications Mix , 1991 .

[19]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Sponsorship: An Important Component of the Promotions Mix , 1987 .

[20]  G. Hastings Sponsorship Works Differently from Advertising , 1984 .

[21]  John R. Anderson A spreading activation theory of memory. , 1983 .

[22]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[23]  C. Osgood,et al.  The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. , 1955, Psychological review.