Exploiting Algebraic and Structural Complexity for Single Snapshot Computed Tomography Hyperspectral Imaging Systems

This paper presents strategies for spectral de- noising of hyperspectral images and 3-D data cube reconstruction from a limited number of tomographic measurements, arising in single snapshot imaging systems. For de-noising the main idea is to exploit the incoherency between the algebraic complexity measure, namely the low rank of the noise-free hyperspectral data cube, and the sparsity structure of the spectral noise. In particular, the non-noisy spectral data, when stacked across the spectral dimension, exhibits low-rank due to a small number of species. On the other hand, under the same representation, the spectral noise exhibits a banded structure. Motivated by this we show that the de-noised spectral data and the unknown spectral noise and the respective bands can be simultaneously estimated through the use of a low-rank and simultaneous sparse minimization operation without prior knowledge of the noisy bands. This result is novel for hyperspectral imaging applications and we compare our results with several existing methods for noisy band recovery. For recovery under limited tomographic projections we exploit both the low algebraic and structural complexity of the data cube via joint rank penalization plus Total Variation/wavelet domain sparsity, which is novel for single snapshot hyperspectral imaging systems. We combine these two approaches for simultaneous spectral de-noising and data cube recovery under limited measurements. We perform extensive simulations and our main result indicates that exploiting both low algebraic and structural complexity has a superior performance compared to exploiting only the structural complexity. To address the computational challenges associated with the resulting optimization problem we adapt several recent developments in the area of convex optimization, specifically employing splitting and proximal point based methods.

[1]  Salah Bourennane,et al.  Multidimensional wiener filtering using fourth order statistics of hyperspectral images , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[2]  Jonathan Martin Mooney,et al.  High-throughput hyperspectral infrared camera , 1997 .

[3]  I. Yamaguchi,et al.  Simultaneous Acquisition of Spectral and Spatial Intensity Distribution , 1993 .

[4]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Nicolas Gillis,et al.  Robust near-separable nonnegative matrix factorization using linear optimization , 2013, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[6]  Patrick L. Combettes,et al.  Proximal Splitting Methods in Signal Processing , 2009, Fixed-Point Algorithms for Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering.

[7]  Caroline Fossati,et al.  Nonwhite Noise Reduction in Hyperspectral Images , 2012, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[8]  Zuowei Shen,et al.  Robust Video Restoration by Joint Sparse and Low Rank Matrix Approximation , 2011, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[9]  C. A. Shah,et al.  Some recent results on hyperspectral image classification , 2003, IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, 2003.

[10]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Dictionary Learning for Noisy and Incomplete Hyperspectral Images , 2012, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[11]  Aswin C. Sankaranarayanan,et al.  SpaRCS: Recovering low-rank and sparse matrices from compressive measurements , 2011, NIPS.

[12]  Eric L. Miller,et al.  Exploiting structural complexity for robust and rapid hyperspectral imaging , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[13]  Paul Scheunders,et al.  Least-squares interband denoising of color and multispectral images , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04..

[14]  K. Kelly,et al.  Compressive Sensing Hyperspectral Imager , 2009 .

[15]  Gongguo Tang,et al.  Verifiable and computable ℓ∞ performance evaluation of ℓ1 sparse signal recovery , 2011, 2011 45th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[16]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  Hyperspectral image data analysis , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[17]  Xiaobai Sun,et al.  Spectral image estimation for coded aperture snapshot spectral imagers , 2008, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[18]  Lei Sun,et al.  Junk band recovery for hyperspectral image based on curvelet transform , 2011 .

[19]  Gongguo Tang,et al.  Robust principal component analysis based on low-rank and block-sparse matrix decomposition , 2011, 2011 45th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[20]  Shuchin Aeron,et al.  First Order Methods for Robust non-negative matrix factorization for large scale noisy data , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[21]  Michael Möller,et al.  A Convex Model for Nonnegative Matrix Factorization and Dimensionality Reduction on Physical Space , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[22]  Guangyi Chen,et al.  Denoising of Hyperspectral Imagery Using Principal Component Analysis and Wavelet Shrinkage , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Marco Diani,et al.  Signal-Dependent Noise Modeling and Model Parameter Estimation in Hyperspectral Images , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[24]  El-hadi Zahzah,et al.  Robust Principal Component Analysis Based on Low-Rank and Block-Sparse Matrix Decomposition , 2016 .

[25]  Bahaa E. A. Saleh Introduction to Subsurface Imaging , 2011 .

[26]  Eustace L. Dereniak,et al.  Demonstration of a high-speed nonscanning imaging spectrometer , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[27]  Truong Q. Nguyen,et al.  An Augmented Lagrangian Method for Total Variation Video Restoration , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[28]  D. Donoho Unconditional Bases Are Optimal Bases for Data Compression and for Statistical Estimation , 1993 .

[29]  Yi Ma,et al.  Robust principal component analysis? , 2009, JACM.

[30]  Giuseppe Durisi,et al.  Real-time principal component pursuit , 2011, 2011 Conference Record of the Forty Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR).

[31]  Pierre Vandergheynst,et al.  Joint trace/TV norm minimization: A new efficient approach for spectral compressive imaging , 2012, 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[32]  Vivek K. Goyal,et al.  Denoising Hyperspectral Imagery and Recovering Junk Bands using Wavelets and Sparse Approximation , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[33]  Sham M. Kakade,et al.  Robust Matrix Decomposition With Sparse Corruptions , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[34]  Venkatesh Saligrama,et al.  Broadband Dispersion Extraction Using Simultaneous Sparse Penalization , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[35]  Ping Feng,et al.  A multicoset sampling approach to the missing cone problem in computer-aided tomography , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. Circuits and Systems Connecting the World. ISCAS 96.

[36]  Sinthop Kaewpijit,et al.  A wavelet-based PCA reduction for hyperspectral imagery , 2002, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[37]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..