Factor Structure, Convergent Validity, and Discriminant Validity of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Health Battery (NIHTB-CHB) in Adults

Abstract The objective of this study is to evaluate the construct validity of the NIH Neurobehavioral Toolbox Cognitive Health Battery (NIHTB-CHB) in adults. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the dimensional structure underlying the NIHTB-CHB and Gold Standard tests chosen to serve as concurrent validity criteria for the NIHTB-CHB. These results were used to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the NIHTB-CHB in adults ranging from 20 to 85 years of age. Five dimensions were found to explain the correlations among NIHTB-CHB and Gold Standard tests: Vocabulary, Reading, Episodic Memory, Working Memory and Executive Function/Processing Speed. NIHTB-CHB measures and their Gold Standard analogues defined factors in a pattern that broadly supported the convergent and discriminant validity of the NIHTB-CHB tests. This 5-factor structure was found to be invariant across 20–60 year old (N=159) and 65–85 year old (N=109) age groups that were included in the current validity study. Second order Crystallized Abilities (Vocabulary and Reading) and Fluid Abilities (Episodic Memory, Working Memory, Executive/Speed) factors parsimoniously explained correlations among the five first order factors. These results suggest that the NIHTB-CHB will provide both fine-grained and broad characterization of cognition across the adult age span. (JINS, 2014, 20, 1–9)

[1]  Ron Dumont,et al.  Delis‐Kaplan Executive Function System , 2008 .

[2]  J. Schuck,et al.  Factor analysis of the WAIS and Wechsler Memory Scale: an analysis of the construct validity of the Wechsler Memory Scale. , 1983, Journal of clinical neuropsychology.

[3]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[4]  E. Tangalos,et al.  Mayo's Older Americans Normative Studies (MOANS) : factor structure of a core battery , 1992 .

[5]  D. Delis,et al.  The myth of testing construct validity using factor analysis or correlations with normal or mixed clinical populations: Lessons from memory assessment , 2003, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[6]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[8]  R. Heaton,et al.  VII. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): factor structure for 3 to 15 year olds. , 2013, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[9]  M. Audiffren,et al.  Processing speed and executive functions in cognitive aging: How to disentangle their mutual relationship? , 2012, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  N. Fox,et al.  NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function , 2013, Neurology.

[11]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[12]  D. Gronwall.  Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery from Concussion , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.

[13]  John O. Willis,et al.  Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition , 2014 .

[14]  M. Crossley,et al.  Partial measurement equivalence of French and English versions of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging neuropsychological battery , 2009, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[15]  P. Bentler.  Comparative Fit Indices in Structural Models , 1990 .

[16]  E. Tangalos,et al.  Factor Structure of the Mayo Older Americans Normative Sample (MOANS) Core Battery: Replication in a Clinical Sample , 1993 .

[17]  M. Cook,et al.  Measurement invariance of core cognitive abilities in heterogeneous neurological and community samples , 2004 .

[18]  S. Bowden,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis of combined Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised and Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised scores in a healthy community sample , 1999 .

[19]  Jewel Swanson.  The Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System , 2005 .

[20]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[21]  Dan M Mungas,et al.  Composite scores for executive function items: Demographic heterogeneity and relationships with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging , 2008, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[22]  A. Shapiro,et al.  On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential Chi-square statistics , 1985 .

[23]  J. J. Ryan,et al.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III , 2001 .

[24]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System , 2012 .

[25]  T. Salthouse.  Relations between cognitive abilities and measures of executive functioning. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[26]  P. Rubé,et al.  L’examen Clinique en Psychologie , 1959 .

[27]  S. Bowden.  The role of factor analysis in construct validity: Is it a myth? , 2004, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[28]  B. Reed,et al.  Measurement invariance of neuropsychological tests in diverse older persons. , 2011, Neuropsychology.

[29]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.