Simulation of the oil spill processes in the Sea of Japan with regional ocean circulation model

Abstract: A simulation of the movement of spilled oil after the incident of the Russian tanker Nakhodka in the Sea of Japan, in January 1997, was performed by a particle tracking model incorporating advection by currents, random diffusion, the buoyancy effect, the parameterization of oil evaporation, biodegradation, and beaching. The currents advecting spilled oil were defined by surface wind drift superposed on the three-dimensional ocean currents obtained by the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory modular ocean model (GFDL MOM), which was forced by the climatological monthly mean meteorological data, or by the European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) daily meteorological data, and assimilated sea surface topography detected by satellite altimeter. A number of experiments with different parameters and situations showed that the wide geographical spread of oil observed is not explained by wind drift alone, and that including the simulated climatological currents gives better results. The combination of surface wind drift and daily ocean currents shows the best agreement between the model and observations except in some coastal areas. The daily meteorological effect on the ocean circulation model results in a stronger variability of currents that closely simulates some features of the nonlinear large-scale horizontal turbulent diffusion of oil. The effect of different parameterizations for the size distribution of model oil particles is discussed.

[1]  A. Elliott,et al.  Shear diffusion and the spread of oil in the surface layers of the North Sea , 1986 .

[2]  G. Mellor,et al.  A Hierarchy of Turbulence Closure Models for Planetary Boundary Layers. , 1974 .

[3]  Per S. Daling,et al.  Characterization of crude oils for environmental purposes , 1990 .

[4]  Per S. Daling,et al.  Droplet size distributions in chemical dispersion of oil spills: Towards a mathematical model , 1990 .

[5]  Methods for predicting the physical changes in oil spilt at sea , 1988 .

[6]  A. Elliott,et al.  The influence of tidal currents and wind on mixing in the surface layers of the sea , 1997 .

[7]  Rizwan Ahmed Khan,et al.  On mathematical and empirical models for surface oil spill transport in the Gulf , 1993 .

[8]  K. Whittle,et al.  A Quantitative Assessment of the Sources and Fate of Petroleum Compounds in the Marine Environment , 1982 .

[9]  Roger Proctor,et al.  Modelling tides and surface drift in the Arabian Gulf—application to the Gulf oil spill , 1994 .

[10]  M. Cox A primitive equation, 3-dimensional model of the ocean , 1984 .

[11]  Ichiro Fukumori,et al.  Assimilation of TOPEX/POSEIDON Altimeter Data with a Reduced Gravity Model of the Japan Sea , 1999 .

[12]  C. E. Sweeney,et al.  Natural dispersion of oil , 1988 .

[13]  Clayton D. McAuliffe,et al.  Fate of hydrocarbons discharged at sea , 1989 .

[14]  Kisaburo Nakata,et al.  Hindcast of a Japan Sea oil spill , 1997 .

[15]  J. Yoon,et al.  Modeling of the wind-driven circulation in the Japan Sea using a reduced gravity model , 1996 .

[16]  M. Reed,et al.  Oil Spill Modeling towards the Close of the 20th Century: Overview of the State of the Art , 1999 .

[17]  M. Redi Oceanic Isopycnal Mixing by Coordinate Rotation , 1982 .

[18]  N. Hirose,et al.  Heat budget in the Japan Sea , 1996 .

[19]  J. Yoon,et al.  A Numerical Modeling of the Upper and the Intermediate Layer Circulation in the East Sea , 1999 .

[20]  Roger Proctor,et al.  Forecast and hindcast simulations of the Braer oil spill , 1994 .