Integrated Science and Mathematics Professional Development Programs

Over the past 5 years, integrated science and mathematics professional development programs for grades 4-10 science and mathematics teachers have been designed and implemented at Wright State University. The primary goals of the programs were to enhance the science and mathematics content understanding and pedagogical knowledge of the participant teachers in order to increase teacher confidence and promote the implementation of standards-based teaching practices in precollege classrooms. In this article, the general program structure developed and implemented over the years is discussed. Focusing on the 1999 program, evidence is presented of enhanced participant content understanding and pedagogical preparation, and specific examples of modified teacher practices are discussed.

[1]  L. C. Greene.  Science-Centered Curriculum in Elementary School. , 1991 .

[2]  Thomas C. DeFranco,et al.  Integration of Science and Mathematics: A Theoretical Model. , 1997 .

[3]  G. Wiggins.  Teaching to the (Authentic) Test. , 1989 .

[4]  Michael T. Battista,et al.  Teacher Beliefs and the Reform Movement in Mathematics Education. , 1994 .

[5]  Peggy J. Tilgner,et al.  Avoiding science in the elementary school , 1990 .

[6]  P. B. Mesquita,et al.  Educational reform and the self-efficacy beliefs of teachers implementing nongraded primary school programs , 1994 .

[7]  Michael E. Beeth,et al.  Teaching for Conceptual Change , 1998 .

[8]  William S. Carlsen,et al.  Teacher knowledge and discourse control: Quantitative evidence from novice biology teachers' classrooms , 1993 .

[9]  Larry E. Schafer,et al.  The effects of knowledge on elementary science inquiry teachin , 1984 .

[10]  G. Wiggins.  Assessment: Authenticity, Context, and Validity. , 1993 .

[11]  David M. Davison,et al.  What Does Integration of Science and Mathematics Really Mean , 1995 .

[12]  Jeffrey R. Lehman.  Integrating Science and Mathematics: Perceptions of Preservice and Practicing Elementary Teachers , 1994 .

[13]  Charlene M. Czerniak,et al.  Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands , 1996 .

[14]  L. Enochs,et al.  Establishing Factorial Validity of the Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument , 2000 .

[15]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[16]  Terrence C. Mason.  Integrated Curricula: Potential and Problems , 1996 .

[17]  Charlene M. Czerniak,et al.  A Literature Review of Science and Mathematics Integration , 1999 .

[18]  General biology: Creating a positive learning environment for elementary education majors , 1996 .

[19]  John R. Staver,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing Science Teaching Self-Efficacy of Elementary Level Teachers. , 1996 .

[20]  A. Lawson,et al.  Promoting Intellectual Development Through Science Teaching. , 1973 .

[21]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Teaching for Understanding--Within and across Disciplines. , 1994 .

[22]  Michael L. Connell,et al.  Reconstructing elementary teacher candidates' understanding of mathematics and science content , 1993 .

[23]  Mary Ann Huntley,et al.  Design and Implementation of a Framework for Defining Integrated Mathematics and Science Education. , 1998 .