Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis

The correlation between knowledge and attitudes has been the source of controversy in research on the public understanding of science (PUS). Although many studies, both quantitative and qualitative, have examined this issue, the results are at best diverse and at worst contradictory. In this paper, we review the evidence on the relationship between public attitudes and public knowledge about science across 40 countries using a meta-analytic approach. We fit multilevel models to data from 193 nationally representative surveys on PUS carried out since 1989. We find a small positive correlation between general attitudes towards science and general knowledge of scientific facts, after controlling for a range of possible confounding variables. This general relationship varies little across cultures but more substantially between different domains of science and technology. Our results suggest that PUS research needs to focus on understanding the mechanisms that underlie the clear association that exists between knowledge and attitudes about science.

[1]  Brian Wynne,et al.  May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. , 2004 .

[2]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[3]  R. Pardo,et al.  Attitudes toward science among the European public: a methodological analysis , 2002 .

[4]  R. Rosenthal.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[5]  George Gaskell,et al.  In the public eye: representations of biotechnology in Europe , 2001 .

[6]  Mike Michael,et al.  Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge , 2003 .

[7]  P. Lee,et al.  Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  N. Allum,et al.  Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes , 2004 .

[9]  Meinolf Dierkes,et al.  Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology , 1999 .

[10]  Martin W. Bauer,et al.  Biotechnology - the Making of a Global Controversy , 2002 .

[11]  Theodor D. Sterling,et al.  Publication decisions revisited: the effect of the outcome of statistical tests on the decision to p , 1995 .

[12]  Jon D. Miller.  The measurement of civic scientific literacy , 1998 .

[13]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Wising up : the public and new technologies , 2000 .

[14]  G. Gaskell,et al.  Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S. , 1999, Science.

[15]  Martin W. Bauer,et al.  EUROPEAN PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF SCIENCE , 1994 .

[16]  D. Dietz.  THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCIENCE WRITERS. , 1937 .

[17]  J. Durant,et al.  Attitudes of selected public groups in the UK to biotechnology. , 1992 .

[18]  M. Michael.  Comprehension, Apprehension, Prehension: Heterogeneity and the Public Understanding of Science , 2002 .

[19]  J. Durant,et al.  Biotechnology in Public: A Review of Recent Research , 1992 .

[20]  M K McBeth,et al.  Citizen perceptions of risks associated with moving radiological waste. , 1995, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[21]  B Wynne.  Expert discourses of risk and ethics on genetically manipulated organisms: the weaving of public alienation. , 2001, Notizie di Politeia.

[22]  G. Gaskell,et al.  Two cultures of public understanding of science and technology in Europe , 2000 .

[23]  W. R. Sharp,et al.  A Steering and Visualization Toolkit for Distributed Applications , 2006, PDPTA.

[24]  B. Wynne,et al.  Misunderstanding science? : the public reconstruction of science and technology , 1996 .

[25]  R. Pardo,et al.  The Cognitive Dimension of Public Perceptions of Science: Methodological Issues , 2004 .

[26]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  Multilevel Analysis Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[27]  John E. Havelock,et al.  Citizens , 2005, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[28]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  The Illusion of Public Opinion: Fact and Artifact in American Public Opinion Polls , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[29]  Timothy J. Robinson,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[30]  Jon D. Miller,et al.  Public perceptions of science and technology : a comparative study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada , 1997 .

[31]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  Jon D. Miller.  Public Understanding of, and Attitudes toward, Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know , 2004 .

[33]  Stephen B. Withey,et al.  Public Opinion about Science and Scientists , 1959 .

[34]  N. Allum,et al.  Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: Reply to Hayes and Tariq , 2001 .

[35]  Mike Michael,et al.  Misunderstanding science?: Ignoring science: discourses of ignorance in the public understanding of science , 1996 .

[36]  V. Tariq,et al.  Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: a comparative study of four Anglo-American nations , 2000 .

[37]  J. Durant,et al.  The public understanding of science , 1989, Nature.

[38]  J. Durant,et al.  The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain , 1995 .