Responsiveness to perturbations is a hallmark of transcription factors that maintain cell identity

Our ability to identify the particular transcription factors that maintain cell type is limited. Identification of factors by their cell type-specific expression or their participation in developmental regulation has been only modestly successful. We hypothesized that because cell type is often resilient to perturbations, the transcriptional response to perturbations would identify identity-maintaining factors. We developed Perturbation Panel Profiling (P3) as a framework for perturbing cells in dozens of conditions and measuring gene expression responsiveness transcriptome-wide. Applying P3 to human iPSC-derived cardiac myocytes showed that transcription factors known to function in cardiac differentiation and maintenance were among the most frequently up-regulated (most responsive). We reasoned that one potential function of responsive genes may be to maintain cellular identity. We identified responsive transcription factors in fibroblasts using P3 and found that suppressing their expression led to enhanced reprogramming efficiency. We propose that responsiveness to perturbations is a property of factors that help maintain cellular identity.

[1]  Joshua M. Stuart,et al.  A TBX5 dosage-sensitive gene regulatory network for human congenital heart disease , 2019, bioRxiv.

[2]  Marc Hafner,et al.  A Multi-center Study on the Reproducibility of Drug-Response Assays in Mammalian Cell Lines , 2019, Cell systems.

[3]  A. Cribbs,et al.  Bromodomain inhibition of the coactivators CBP/EP300 facilitate cellular reprogramming , 2019, Nature Chemical Biology.

[4]  E. Olson,et al.  Genetic and epigenetic regulation of cardiomyocytes in development, regeneration and disease , 2018, Development.

[5]  Kun Zhang,et al.  Mapping Cellular Reprogramming via Pooled Overexpression Screens with Paired Fitness and Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Readout. , 2018, Cell systems.

[6]  Lei S. Qi,et al.  CRISPR Activation Screens Systematically Identify Factors that Drive Neuronal Fate and Reprogramming. , 2018, Cell stem cell.

[7]  Julio Saez-Rodriguez,et al.  Signatures of cell death and proliferation in perturbation transcriptomics data—from confounding factor to effective prediction , 2018, bioRxiv.

[8]  S. Merali,et al.  FOXD1-dependent MICU1 expression regulates mitochondrial activity and cell differentiation , 2018, Nature Communications.

[9]  Ravi Iyengar,et al.  The Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures NIH Program: System-Level Cataloging of Human Cells Response to Perturbations. , 2017, Cell systems.

[10]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues , 2017, Nature.

[11]  Samantha A. Morris,et al.  Engineering cell identity: establishing new gene regulatory and chromatin landscapes. , 2017, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[12]  E. Olson,et al.  ZNF281 enhances cardiac reprogramming by modulating cardiac and inflammatory gene expression , 2017, Genes & development.

[13]  Sydney M. Shaffer,et al.  Rare cell variability and drug-induced reprogramming as a mode of cancer drug resistance , 2017, Nature.

[14]  Thomas Vierbuchen,et al.  Myt1l safeguards neuronal identity by actively repressing many non-neuronal fates , 2017, Nature.

[15]  Allon M. Klein,et al.  miR-9 regulates basal ganglia-dependent developmental vocal learning and adult vocal performance in songbirds , 2017, bioRxiv.

[16]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Chemical Enhancement of In Vitro and In Vivo Direct Cardiac Reprogramming , 2017, Circulation.

[17]  J. Ernst,et al.  Cooperative Binding of Transcription Factors Orchestrates Reprogramming , 2017, Cell.

[18]  Beth L. Pruitt,et al.  Disease Model of GATA4 Mutation Reveals Transcription Factor Cooperativity in Human Cardiogenesis , 2016, Cell.

[19]  G. Wagner,et al.  The origin and evolution of cell types , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  J. Beggs,et al.  Extremely fast and incredibly close: co-transcriptional splicing in budding yeast , 2016, bioRxiv.

[21]  Yoshihide Hayashizaki,et al.  A predictive computational framework for direct reprogramming between human cell types , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[22]  A. Raj,et al.  Half dozen of one, six billion of the other: What can small- and large-scale molecular systems biology learn from one another? , 2015, Genome research.

[23]  W. L. Ruzzo,et al.  Inhibition of β-catenin signaling respecifies anterior-like endothelium into beating human cardiomyocytes , 2015, Development.

[24]  Michael J. Ziller,et al.  Integrative Analyses of Human Reprogramming Reveal Dynamic Nature of Induced Pluripotency , 2015, Cell.

[25]  A. Raj,et al.  Single mammalian cells compensate for differences in cellular volume and DNA copy number through independent global transcriptional mechanisms. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[26]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Direct cardiac reprogramming: progress and challenges in basic biology and clinical applications. , 2015, Circulation research.

[27]  Michele A. Busby,et al.  Simultaneous generation of many RNA-seq libraries in a single reaction , 2015, Nature Methods.

[28]  N. Bursac,et al.  Stoichiometry of Gata4, Mef2c, and Tbx5 Influences the Efficiency and Quality of Induced Cardiac Myocyte Reprogramming , 2015, Circulation research.

[29]  E. Olson,et al.  Induction of diverse cardiac cell types by reprogramming fibroblasts with cardiac transcription factors , 2014, Development.

[30]  Samantha A. Morris,et al.  CellNet: Network Biology Applied to Stem Cell Engineering , 2014, Cell.

[31]  Samantha A. Morris,et al.  Dissecting Engineered Cell Types and Enhancing Cell Fate Conversion via CellNet , 2014, Cell.

[32]  Jay W. Shin,et al.  A transient disruption of fibroblastic transcriptional regulatory network facilitates trans-differentiation , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  Kimara L. Targoff,et al.  Nkx genes are essential for maintenance of ventricular identity , 2013, Development.

[34]  Li Qian,et al.  Direct Reprogramming of Human Fibroblasts toward a Cardiomyocyte-like State , 2013, Stem cell reports.

[35]  Filipa Pinto,et al.  Optimization of direct fibroblast reprogramming to cardiomyocytes using calcium activity as a functional measure of success. , 2013, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[36]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts into cardiomyocyte-like cells in vitro , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[37]  J Michael DiMaio,et al.  Making steady progress on direct cardiac reprogramming toward clinical application. , 2013, Circulation research.

[38]  Guangchuang Yu,et al.  clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. , 2012, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[39]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Integrative annotation of human large intergenic noncoding RNAs reveals global properties and specific subclasses. , 2011, Genes & development.

[40]  M. Laflamme,et al.  Methods for the derivation and use of cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[41]  Ying Jin,et al.  Role of Oct4 in maintaining and regaining stem cell pluripotency , 2010, Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

[42]  Wei-Zhong Zhu,et al.  Neuregulin/ErbB Signaling Regulates Cardiac Subtype Specification in Differentiating Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2010, Circulation research.

[43]  V. Vedantham,et al.  Direct Reprogramming of Fibroblasts into Functional Cardiomyocytes by Defined Factors , 2010, Cell.

[44]  Thomas Vierbuchen,et al.  Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors , 2010, Nature.

[45]  Masaki Ieda,et al.  Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by defined factors. , 2010, Cell.

[46]  G. Daley,et al.  Live cell imaging distinguishes bona fide human iPS cells from partially reprogrammed cells , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[47]  Benoit G. Bruneau,et al.  Directed transdifferentiation of mouse mesoderm to heart tissue by defined factors , 2009, Nature.

[48]  Juan M. Vaquerizas,et al.  A census of human transcription factors: function, expression and evolution , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[49]  Scott A. Rifkin,et al.  Imaging individual mRNA molecules using multiple singly labeled probes , 2008, Nature Methods.

[50]  E. Olson,et al.  Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Sarcomere Integrity and Postnatal Muscle Function by Mef2c , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[51]  Lila R Collins,et al.  Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[52]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[53]  G. Cooper.  The Origin and Evolution of Cells , 2000 .

[54]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Molecular Pathways Controlling Heart Development , 1996, Science.

[55]  S. Tapscott,et al.  Activation of muscle-specific genes in pigment, nerve, fat, liver, and fibroblast cell lines by forced expression of MyoD. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.