Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames – Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties

Abstract Seismic fragilities are essential to earthquake loss estimation and performance-based earthquake engineering in regions of high seismicity. Construction practices for frames in regions of moderate seismicity are quite different, and such frames have received less attention in the literature. Fragilities for performance levels identified in recent seismic regulations are developed herein for reinforced concrete frames designed for gravity load in low-seismic regions using probabilistic non-linear finite element analysis. An examination of the contribution of uncertainties in material and structural parameters reveals that structural damping, concrete strength, and cracking strain in beam–column joints have the greatest impact on the fragilities of such frames. However, fragilities that incorporate these sources of uncertainty are only slightly different from those based solely on the uncertainty in seismic demand from earthquake ground motion, suggesting that fragilities that are developed under the assumption that all structural parameters are deterministic and equal to their median (or mean) values are sufficient for purposes of earthquake damage and loss estimation in regions of moderate seismicity. Confidence bounds on the fragilities are also presented as a measure of their accuracy for risk-informed decision-making, for prioritizing risk mitigation efforts in regions of low-to-moderate seismicity.

[1]  B. Ellingwood,et al.  Fragility assessment of building structural systems in Mid‐America , 2007 .

[2]  J. G. MacGregor.  Statistical Analysis of Resistance of Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Members , 1983 .

[3]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Probability-based seismic response analysis , 2005 .

[4]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  The Role of Fragility Assessment in Consequence-Based Engineering , 2005 .

[5]  Y. K. Wen,et al.  Uniform Hazard Ground Motions for Mid-America Cities , 2001 .

[6]  James L. Beck,et al.  Sensitivity of Building Loss Estimates to Major Uncertain Variables , 2002 .

[7]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Seismic Risk Assessment of Gravity Load Designed Reinforced Concrete Frames Subjected to Mid-America Ground Motions , 2009 .

[8]  David A. Nethercot.  Reliability, responsibility and reality in structural engineering , 2008 .

[9]  Robert B. Olshansky,et al.  Inventory of Essential Facilities in Mid-America , 2001 .

[10]  Ozan Cem Celik,et al.  Probabilistic assessment of non-ductile reinforced concrete frames susceptible to mid-America ground motions , 2007 .

[11]  James G. MacGregor,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE IN STRUCTURES , 1996 .

[12]  Joan S. Gomberg,et al.  Earthquake Hazard in the Heart of the Homeland , 2007 .

[13]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure , 2006 .

[14]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[15]  Paolo Gardoni,et al.  Seismic Fragility and Confidence Bounds for Gravity Load Designed Reinforced Concrete Frames of Varying Height , 2008 .

[16]  B. Efron.  Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 1979 .

[17]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Modeling Beam-Column Joints in Fragility Assessment of Gravity Load Designed Reinforced Concrete Frames , 2008 .

[18]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Earthquakes, Records, and Nonlinear Responses , 1998 .

[19]  A. Olsson,et al.  On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis , 2003 .

[20]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .