Carbon Pricing: What Role for Border Carbon Adjustments?

management. to the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference, also known as COP26, in November 2021. Pressure for BCAs will likely intensify as some countries and regions move ahead aggressively with carbon pricing while others do not. Abstract This Climate Note discusses the rationale, design, and impacts of border carbon adjustments (BCAs), charges on embodied carbon in imports potentially matched by rebates for embodied carbon in exports. Large disparities in carbon pricing between countries is raising concerns about competitiveness and emissions leakage, and BCAs are a potentially effective instrument for addressing such concerns. Design details are critical, however. For example, limiting coverage of the BCA to energy-intensive, trade-exposed industries facilitates administration, and initially benchmarking BCAs on domestic emissions intensities would help ease the transition for emissions-intensive trading partners. It is also important to consider how to apply BCAs across countries with different approaches to emissions mitigation. BCAs are challenging because they pose legal risks and may be at odds with the differentiated responsibilities of developing countries. Furthermore, BCAs provide only modest incentives for other large emitting countries to scale carbon pricing—an international carbon price floor would be far more effective in this regard. that it explore carbon border taxes as part of its trade policy agenda. Prior to the election, the Biden campaign signaled support for imposing a BCA on imports from countries that are failing to meet their climate and environmental obligations.

[1]  Tchetin Kazak European Green Deal , 2022, Yearbook of the Law Department.

[2]  M. Keen,et al.  Border Carbon Adjustments: Rationale, Design and Impact , 2021, IMF Working Papers.

[3]  Philippe Wingender,et al.  Revisiting Carbon Leakage , 2021, IMF Working Papers.

[4]  I. Parry Proposal for an International Carbon Price Floor Among Large Emitters , 2021, Staff Climate Notes.

[5]  Climate Policy Leadership in an Interconnected World , 2020 .

[6]  P. Lamy,et al.  A European Border Carbon Adjustment proposal , 2020, Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review.

[7]  Achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 , 2020 .

[8]  J. Ellis,et al.  Carbon pricing and competitiveness: are they at odds? , 2020 .

[9]  Stefano F. Verde THE IMPACT OF THE EU EMISSIONS TRADING SYSTEM ON COMPETITIVENESS AND CARBON LEAKAGE: THE ECONOMETRIC EVIDENCE , 2020 .

[10]  H. van Asselt,et al.  Designing Border Carbon Adjustments for Enhanced Climate Action , 2019, American Journal of International Law.

[11]  Balaji Janamanchi The Willing World: Shaping and Sharing a Sustainable Global Prosperity , 2019, The International Trade Journal.

[12]  Tatiana Falcão A Proposition for a Multilateral Carbon Tax Treaty , 2019 .

[13]  Misato Sato,et al.  International and sectoral variation in industrial energy prices 1995–2015 , 2019, Energy Economics.

[14]  S. Pauer Including electricity imports in California’s cap-and-trade program: A case study of a border carbon adjustment in practice , 2018, The Electricity Journal.

[15]  K. Sommerfeld,et al.  Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature , 2018, Climate Policy.

[16]  David Bullock Combating Climate Recalcitrance: Carbon-Related Border Tax Adjustments in a New Era of Global Climate Governance , 2018 .

[17]  Antoine Dechezleprêtre,et al.  The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness , 2017, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[18]  Deger Saygin,et al.  Long-term model-based projections of energy use and CO2 emissions from the global steel and cement industries , 2016 .

[19]  C. Fischer,et al.  Carbon taxes and energy-intensive trade-exposed industries: impacts and options , 2015 .

[20]  D. Revel Changing climate for carbon taxes: Who’s afraid of the WTO ? , 2013 .

[21]  R. Weber,et al.  Carbon-related border tax adjustment: mitigating climate change or restricting international trade? , 2011, World Trade Review.

[22]  N. Ghaleigh,et al.  The spectre of carbon border-adjustment measures , 2011 .

[23]  L. Greene EHPnet: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 2000, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[24]  EURACOAL response to the European Commission’s proposal for a Regulation establishing a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism , 2021 .

[25]  Joost Pauwelyn,et al.  Trade related aspects of a carbon border adjustment mechanism , 2020 .

[26]  U. Zweifel,et al.  United Nations Environment Programme , 2005, Essential Concepts of Global Environmental Governance.