Antitumor effects of combining metronomic chemotherapy with the antivascular action of ultrasound stimulated microbubbles

Considerable effort is being directed toward investigating the use of ultrasound (US) stimulated microbubbles (MB) to promote the uptake of anticancer agents in tumors. In this study we propose and investigate a new method for combining therapeutic ultrasound with anticancer agents, which is to induce antivascular effects and combine these with an antiangiogenic treatment strategy, in this case metronomic chemotherapy. This is effectively a vascular targeting rather than a drug delivery approach. Experiments were conducted on MDA‐MB‐231 breast cancer tumors implanted in athymic mice. Metronomic cyclophosphamide (MCTX) was employed as an antiangiogenic therapy and was administered through the drinking water. Ultrasound stimulated microbubble treatments (USMB) were conducted at 1 MHz employing short bursts (0.00024 duty cycle) at 1.6 MPa in combination with the commercial microbubble agent Definity. USMB treatments were performed on a weekly basis for 4 weeks and MCTX was administered for 10 weeks. The USMB induced an acute reduction of blood flow as confirmed with US contrast imaging and DiOC7 perfusion staining. Longitudinal experiments demonstrated that significant growth inhibition occurred in MCTX‐only and USMB‐only treatment groups relative to control tumors. The combined USMB and MCTX treatment group showed significant growth inhibition and survival prolongation relative to the USMB‐only (p < 0.01) and MCTX‐only treatment groups (p < 0.01). These results indicate the feasibility of a new approach to combining therapeutic ultrasound with an anticancer agent.

[1]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Microbubble contrast agent with focused ultrasound to create brain lesions at low power levels: MR imaging and histologic study in rabbits. , 2006, Radiology.

[2]  R. Kerbel,et al.  Antiangiogenic strategies on defense: on the possibility of blocking rebounds by the tumor vasculature after chemotherapy. , 2007, Cancer research.

[3]  P. Flecknell,et al.  Study of apoptosis and heat shock protein (HSP) expression in hepatocytes following radiofrequency ablation (RFA). , 2005, The Journal of surgical research.

[4]  Wen-zhi Chen,et al.  Tumor vessel destruction resulting from high-intensity focused ultrasound in patients with solid malignancies. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  R. Kerbel,et al.  Optimal biologic dose of metronomic chemotherapy regimens is associated with maximum antiangiogenic activity. , 2005, Blood.

[6]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Investigating the effects of pulsed low intensity ultrasound and microbubbles in mouse tumors , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[7]  F A Jolesz,et al.  Potential adverse effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound exposure on blood vessels in vivo. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  Lawrence A Crum,et al.  Vascular effects induced by combined 1-MHz ultrasound and microbubble contrast agent treatments in vivo. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  Susan M. Schultz,et al.  Antivascular ultrasound therapy extends survival of mice with implanted melanomas. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  C. Di Serio,et al.  TIE2-expressing macrophages limit the therapeutic efficacy of the vascular-disrupting agent combretastatin A4 phosphate in mice. , 2011, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[11]  Natalia Vykhodtseva,et al.  Targeted delivery of doxorubicin to the rat brain at therapeutic levels using MRI‐guided focused ultrasound , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[12]  Feng-Hou Gao,et al.  Enhancing chemotherapeutic drug inhibition on tumor growth by ultrasound: an in vivo experiment , 2011, Journal of drug targeting.

[13]  Douglas L. Miller Overview of experimental studies of biological effects of medical ultrasound caused by gas body activation and inertial cavitation. , 2007, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[14]  A. Brayman,et al.  Correlation between inertial cavitation dose and endothelial cell damage in vivo. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  Robert S. Kerbel,et al.  The anti-angiogenic basis of metronomic chemotherapy , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[16]  K. Hoyt,et al.  Microbubble-mediated ultrasonic techniques for improved chemotherapeutic delivery in cancer , 2012, Journal of drug targeting.

[17]  D. Hicklin,et al.  Therapy-Induced Acute Recruitment of Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells to Tumors , 2006, Science.

[18]  R. Kerbel,et al.  Low-dose metronomic cyclophosphamide combined with vascular disrupting therapy induces potent antitumor activity in preclinical human tumor xenograft models , 2009, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[19]  T. Leighton The Acoustic Bubble , 1994 .

[20]  J. Folkman,et al.  Antiangiogenic scheduling of chemotherapy improves efficacy against experimental drug-resistant cancer. , 2000, Cancer research.

[21]  M. Horsman,et al.  Pathophysiologic effects of vascular-targeting agents and the implications for combination with conventional therapies. , 2006, Cancer research.

[22]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Comparison of intermittent-bolus contrast imaging with conventional power Doppler sonography: quantification of tumour perfusion in small animals. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  R. Kerbel,et al.  Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic study of chronic low-dose metronomic cyclophosphamide therapy in mice , 2007, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[24]  E. Unger,et al.  Therapeutic applications of lipid-coated microbubbles. , 2004, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[25]  Chryso Kanthou,et al.  Disrupting tumour blood vessels , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[26]  G. ter Haar High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Tumors , 2001, Echocardiography.

[27]  Nicolas André,et al.  Metronomic chemotherapy: new rationale for new directions , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[28]  M. Kohno,et al.  Treatment of ischemic limbs based on local recruitment of vascular endothelial growth factor-producing inflammatory cells with ultrasonic microbubble destruction. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Antivascular effects of pulsed low intensity ultrasound and microbubbles in mouse tumors , 2008, 2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[30]  Chih-Kuang Yeh,et al.  Concurrent blood-brain barrier opening and local drug delivery using drug-carrying microbubbles and focused ultrasound for brain glioma treatment. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[31]  E. Blomme,et al.  Comparison of immunohistochemistry for activated caspase‐3 and cleaved cytokeratin 18 with the TUNEL method for quantification of apoptosis in histological sections of PC‐3 subcutaneous xenografts , 2003, The Journal of pathology.

[32]  Win-Li Lin,et al.  Ultrasound sonication with microbubbles disrupts blood vessels and enhances tumor treatments of anticancer nanodrug , 2012, International journal of nanomedicine.

[33]  Bruno Quesson,et al.  A method for MRI guidance of intercostal high intensity focused ultrasound ablation in the liver. , 2010, Medical physics.

[34]  Katherine W Ferrara,et al.  Enhancement of vascular permeability with low-frequency contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the chorioallantoic membrane model. , 2007, Radiology.

[35]  Alexander R. Klotz,et al.  Temperature change near microbubbles within a capillary network during focused ultrasound , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  G. Haar,et al.  High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Tumors , 2001, Echocardiography.

[37]  C. Sehgal,et al.  The disruption of murine tumor neovasculature by low-intensity ultrasound-comparison between 1- and 3-MHz sonication frequencies. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[38]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Impact of Focused Ultrasound‐enhanced Drug Delivery on Survival in Rats with Glioma , 2009 .

[39]  B. Fenton,et al.  Quantification of tumour vasculature and hypoxia by immunohistochemical staining and HbO2 saturation measurements , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[40]  W. Shi,et al.  Dual targeting of tumor vasculature: combining Avastin and vascular disrupting agents (CA4P or OXi4503). , 2008, Anticancer research.

[41]  Pei Zhong,et al.  Investigation of HIFU-induced anti-tumor immunity in a murine tumor model , 2007, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[42]  Napoleone Ferrara,et al.  Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target , 2005, Nature.

[43]  I. Tannock,et al.  Drug penetration in solid tumours , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[44]  Peter Bohlen,et al.  Antitumor effects in mice of low-dose (metronomic) cyclophosphamide administered continuously through the drinking water. , 2002, Cancer research.

[45]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Multiphoton Imaging of Ultrasound/Optison Mediated Cerebrovascular Effects in vivo , 2007, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[46]  Roel Deckers,et al.  Ultrasound triggered, image guided, local drug delivery. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[47]  J. Sheehan,et al.  Inhibition of glioma growth by microbubble activation in a subcutaneous model using low duty cycle ultrasound without significant heating. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery.

[48]  Wayne Kreider,et al.  Blood vessel deformations on microsecond time scales by ultrasonic cavitation. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[49]  Ji Song,et al.  Stimulation of Arteriogenesis in Skeletal Muscle by Microbubble Destruction With Ultrasound , 2002, Circulation.

[50]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Ultrasound-microbubble-induced neovascularization in mouse skeletal muscle. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.