Leisure and Pleasure: Science events in unusual locations

Building on concepts relating to informal science education, this work compares science-related activities which successfully engaged public audiences at three different ‘generic’ locations: a garden festival, a public park, and a music festival. The purpose was to identify what factors contribute to the perceived success of science communication activities occurring within leisure spaces. This article reports the results of 71 short (2–3 min) structured interviews with public participants at the events, and 18 structured observations sessions, demonstrating that the events were considered both novel and interesting by the participants. Audience members were found to perceive both educational and affective purposes from the events. Three key elements were identified as contributing to the success of the activities across the three ‘generic venues’: the informality of the surroundings, the involvement of ‘real’ scientists, and the opportunity to re-engage participants with scientific concepts outside formal education.

[1]  Matthew David,et al.  Social Research: The Basics , 2004 .

[2]  Kirsten Ellenbogen,et al.  Free-choice science education: How we learn science outside of school , 2003 .

[3]  Edmund A. Marek,et al.  Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability , 2001 .

[4]  C. Edginton.  Leisure As Transformation , 2008 .

[5]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Research on Learning in Informal Contexts: Advancing the field? , 2007 .

[6]  Joel Gittelsohn,et al.  The Use of Structured Observations in the Study of Health Behaviour , 2000 .

[7]  K. Arcand,et al.  Bringing the universe to the street. A preliminary look at informal learning implications for a large-scale non-traditional science outreach project , 2010 .

[8]  Science on the Underground: an initial evaluation , 1999 .

[9]  M. Hewson.  Science for Citizenship , 1927, Nature.

[10]  K. Bultitude,et al.  Science on the buses: A report to the European Commission , 2003 .

[11]  G. Gauchat.  The cultural authority of science: Public trust and acceptance of organized science , 2011, Public understanding of science.

[12]  D. Schugurensky,et al.  The forms of informal learning: towards a conceptualization of the field , 2000 .

[13]  G. Hein.  Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits , 2009 .

[14]  L. Rennie.  Science Communication and Engagement Beyond Schooling , 2011 .

[15]  S. Stocklmayer,et al.  Science and the Public—What should people know? , 2012 .

[16]  Jan Packer,et al.  Learning for Fun: The Unique Contribution of Educational Leisure Experiences , 2006 .

[17]  G. Rowe,et al.  Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation , 2000 .

[18]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  Out-of-School Time Science Activities and Their Association with Career Interest in STEM , 2012 .

[19]  Philip Bell,et al.  Learning in and out of school in diverse environments: Life-Long, Life-Wide, Life-Deep , 2007 .

[20]  J. Falk.  An Identity‐Centered Approach to Understanding Museum Learning , 2006 .

[21]  Lynn D. Dierking,et al.  The 95 Percent Solution , 2010 .

[22]  Maria Powell,et al.  Building citizen capacities for participation in nanotechnology decision-making: the democratic virtues of the consensus Conference model , 2008 .

[23]  Clare Wilkinson,et al.  ‘Younger People Have Like More of an Imagination, No Offence’: Participant Perspectives on Public Engagement , 2012 .

[24]  Stimulating authentic community involvement in biotechnology policy in Australia , 2007 .

[25]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[26]  Cees M. Koolstra.  An example of a science communication evaluation study: Discovery07, a Dutch science party , 2008 .

[27]  Lynn D. Dierking,et al.  Investigating public science interest and understanding: evidence for the importance of free-choice learning , 2007 .

[28]  Anna Jobér.  Science for Citizenship , 1933, Nature.

[29]  M. Weed,et al.  An Introduction to Leisure Studies , 2002 .

[30]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  Many Experts, Many Audiences: Public Engagement with Science and Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Executive Summary. , 2009 .

[31]  D. L. Hawkes,et al.  An exploratory study of public opinions on the use of hydrogen energy in Wales , 2008 .

[32]  A. Tlili.  The organisational identity of science centres , 2008 .

[33]  Eileen Scanlon,et al.  Practising science communication in the information age : theorising professional practices , 2009 .

[34]  L. Spencer,et al.  Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research , 2002 .

[35]  P. Howdle,et al.  You & Your Body , 2008 .

[36]  Pat Bazeley,et al.  Analysing Qualitative Data: More Than 'Identifying Themes' , 2009 .