Model While You Work: Towards Effective and Playful Acquisition of Stakeholder Processes

The ability to capture individual process behavior and cover it in form of an equivalent operation support is the basis for organizational adaptation in a highly dynamic business environment. Agile process management and resilient learning are typical examples in that context. Traditional mechanisms capturing process behavior employ an external person, such as a consultant, in order to examine workplace designs and to model business processes. However, the increasing prevalence of stakeholder involvement in workplace design and interactive workflow arrangement has prompted the investigation of instant capture-and-process mechanisms. Their main benefit stems from the capability to support work model articulation and recall, an important feature in stakeholder-driven development of heterogeneous environments. Among the perceived disadvantages of existing process capture-and-process mechanisms are poor performance in seamless execution, and difficulty of use in terms of notations. In this paper we describe an instant capture-and-process mechanism based on subject-orientation: Model While You Work. Experiences with the corresponding tool UeberModel indicate that the perceived disadvantages associated with externally moderated mechanisms can be largely overcome due to its adjacency to actual work procedures, qualifying this approach for distributed process capturing and processing.

[1]  Werner Schmidt,et al.  Subject-Oriented Business Process Management , 2012, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[2]  David W. Sprague,et al.  Exploring how and why people use visualizations in casual contexts: Modeling user goals and regulated motivations , 2012, Inf. Vis..

[3]  Jan Mendling,et al.  A Study Into the Factors That Influence the Understandability of Business Process Models , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[4]  Cai-feng Li Agile Supply Chain: competing in volatile markets , 2009 .

[5]  Maarten van Someren,et al.  The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes , 1994 .

[6]  Michael Pidd,et al.  A conceptual framework for understanding business processes and business process modelling , 2000, Inf. Syst. J..

[7]  Jan Hidders,et al.  Round-trip iterative business process modelling between BPA and BPMS tools , 2011, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[8]  Peter Bernus,et al.  Business process modeling through the knowledge management perspective , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[9]  Paul W. P. J. Grefen,et al.  The Structured Process Modeling Theory (SPMT) a cognitive view on why and how modelers benefit from structuring the process of process modeling , 2015, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[10]  Marigo Raftopoulos,et al.  Towards gamification transparency: A conceptual framework for the development of responsible gamified enterprise systems , 2014 .

[11]  Avelino J. Gonzalez,et al.  Storyboarding for Playful Learning , 2006 .

[12]  Michael Prilla,et al.  Fostering self-direction in participatory process design , 2010, PDC '10.

[13]  Jan Mendling,et al.  On the Usage of Labels and Icons in Business Process Modeling , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des..

[14]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Business Process Management , 2016, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[15]  Manuel Laguna,et al.  Business Process Modeling, Simulation and Design , 2004 .

[16]  Ross Brown,et al.  Model as You Do: Engaging an S-BPM Vendor on Process Modelling in 3D Virtual Worlds , 2015, S-BPM in the Wild, Practical Value Creation.

[17]  Christian Stary,et al.  Whom to talk to? A stakeholder perspective on business process development , 2011, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[18]  Paul P. Tallon Inside the adaptive enterprise: an information technology capabilities perspective on business process agility , 2008, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[19]  Julie Smith David,et al.  Business Process Agility , 2005, AMCIS.

[20]  Agnès Front,et al.  A Participative End-User Modeling Approach for Business Process Requirements , 2014, BMMDS/EMMSAD.

[21]  Jonathan Klein,et al.  This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results , 2002, Interact. Comput..

[22]  Alain Abran,et al.  Usability Meanings and Interpretations in ISO Standards , 2003, Software Quality Journal.

[23]  Christian Stary,et al.  Non-disruptive knowledge and business processing in knowledge life cycles - aligning value network analysis to process management , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[24]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  The kaleidoscope of effective gamification: deconstructing gamification in business applications , 2013, Gamification.

[25]  Dimitrios Zevgolis,et al.  Exploring inexperienced user performance of a mobile tablet application through usability testing. , 2013, 2013 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems.

[26]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Configurative Process Modeling - Outlining an Approach to Increased Business Process Model Usability , 2004 .

[27]  Stefan Oppl,et al.  Separation of Concerns in Model Elicitation - Role-Based Actor-Driven Business Process Modeling , 2014, S-BPM ONE Application Studies.

[28]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Comma: a commitment-based business modeling methodology and its empirical evaluation , 2012, AAMAS.

[29]  Christoph Fleischmann,et al.  Subject-Oriented Process Modeling Interface: A Tangible Approach for Subject Process Modeling , 2014, 2014 IEEE 16th Conference on Business Informatics.

[30]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Bertrand David,et al.  Situated cooperative work in engineering How to combine predictable and repeatable behaviors with creativity and agility , 2015, 2015 IEEE 19th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD).

[32]  William Buxton,et al.  Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time) , 2008, CHI.

[33]  Christian Stary,et al.  Semantic work process analysis: a reflexive stakeholder articulation approach , 2013, ECCE.

[34]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures , 2007 .

[35]  Eng Wah Lee,et al.  Business process management (BPM) standards: a survey , 2009, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[36]  W. Rouse Enterprise Transformation: Understanding and Enabling Fundamental Change , 2006 .

[37]  Mathias Weske,et al.  BPEL to BPMN: The Myth of a Straight-Forward Mapping , 2008, OTM Conferences.

[38]  K. Schulz,et al.  Applying Tool-Kit-Based Modeling and Serious Play: A Japanese Case Study on Developing a Future Vision of a Regional Health Care System , 2015 .

[39]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  Cognitive Mechanisms of Conceptual Modelling - How Do People Do It? , 2013, ER.

[40]  Egon Börger,et al.  Approaches to modeling business processes: a critical analysis of BPMN, workflow patterns and YAWL , 2011, Software & Systems Modeling.

[41]  A. Liem Toward prospective reasoning in design: an essay on relationships among designers' reasoning, business strategies, and innovation , 2014 .

[42]  Jonas Lehner,et al.  Personal BPM - Bringing the Power of Business Process Management to the User , 2015, ZEUS.