Assessing Benthic Barriers vs. Aggressive Cutting as Effective Yellow Flag Iris (Iris pseudacorus) Control Mechanisms

An experiment was initiated to study the effects of rubber benthic barriers vs. aggressive cutting on the invasive aquatic emergent plant, yellow flag iris. Treatments were compared against a control at two locations within British Columbia, Canada (Vaseux Lake and Dutch Lake). Yellow flag iris response was significantly different between the two sites, but biologically the results were identical: the benthic barrier killed yellow flag iris rhizomes within 70 d of treatment. Over the extent of the research, at Vaseux Lake the effect of aggressive cutting was no different from the control, while aggressive cutting was statistically no different than the benthic barrier at Dutch Lake. Vegetation regrowth approximately 200 d after the benthic barriers were removed was not detected at either location. These results indicate that rubber benthic barriers may be an effective treatment for yellow flag iris and maybe suitable for other, similar species. Nomenclature: Yellow flag iris, Iris pseudacorus L. IRPS. Management Implications: Rubber matting (benthic barriers) appeared to work well on the emergent aquatic invasive plant yellow flag iris. In less than 3 mo, rhizomes that were treated with the benthic barrier had very few living cells. Additionally, no regrowth from rhizomes was documented the following growing season, further indication of the successful effects of the barriers. Aggressive cutting is also used as a yellow flag iris treatment. Our research found that depending on the site, aggressive cutting may be no different than the untreated control; or it may be no different than the benthic barrier. More research is required to understand how environmental parameters may affect aggressive cutting of yellow flag iris. The abundant exposed soil following benthic barrier treatment, the presence of cattails, and the limited number of yellow flag iris germinants indicates that treated sites have a period of time posttreatment when restoration with desirable species could be implemented.

[1]  A. S. Ackleh,et al.  Invasion, Disturbance, and Competition: Modeling the Fate of Coastal Plant Populations , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[2]  C. Atkinson,et al.  Rapid flood-induced stomatal closure accompanies xylem sap transportation of root-derived acetaldehyde and ethanol in Forsythia , 2008 .

[3]  R. Sairam,et al.  Physiology and biochemistry of waterlogging tolerance in plants , 2008, Biologia Plantarum.

[4]  R. Bobbink,et al.  Variation in seed buoyancy of species in wetland ecosystems with different flooding dynamics , 2005 .

[5]  R. Crawford Seasonal differences in plant responses to flooding and anoxia , 2003 .

[6]  R. Crawford,et al.  Long-term anoxia tolerance in leaves of Acorus calamus L. and Iris pseudacorus L. , 2001, Journal of experimental botany.

[7]  M. Jackson,et al.  Anoxia tolerance in the aquatic monocot Potamogeton pectinatus absence of oxygen stimulates elongation in association with an unusually large pasteur effect. , 2000, Journal of experimental botany.

[8]  G. Velde,et al.  Seed Dispersal, Germination and Seedling Growth of six Helophyte Species in Relation to Water-Level Zonation , 1995 .

[9]  M. Jackson,et al.  Mechanisms of flood tolerance in plants , 1994 .

[10]  K. Fagerstedt,et al.  Comparison of the effect of natural and experimental anoxia on carbohydrate and energy metabolism in Iris pseudacorus rhizomes , 1994 .

[11]  R. Kennedy,et al.  Anaerobic metabolism in plants. , 1992, Plant physiology.

[12]  P. Perata,et al.  Ethanol-induced injuries to carrot cells : the role of acetaldehyde. , 1991, Plant physiology.

[13]  William J. Sutherland Iris Pseudacorus L. , 1990 .

[14]  W. Sutherland,et al.  The Changes in Morphology and Demography of Iris pseudacorus L. at Different Heights on a Saltmarsh , 1990 .

[15]  T. Kimmerer,et al.  Ethylene, Ethane, Acetaldehyde, and Ethanol Production By Plants under Stress. , 1982, Plant physiology.

[16]  O. W. Richards Biological Flora of the British Isles , 1942 .

[17]  O. Lakela A Floristic Study of a Developing Plant Community on Minnesota Point, Minnesota , 1939 .

[18]  P. Raven,et al.  IRIS PSEUDACORUS IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA , 1970 .