Evaluation of Development Programs: Randomized Controlled Trials or Regressions?

Can project evaluation methods be used to evaluate programs: complex interventions involving multiple activities? A program evaluation cannot be based simply on separate evaluations of its components if interactions between the activities are important. In this paper a measure is proposed, the total program effect (TPE), which is an extension of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATET). It explicitly takes into account that in the real world (with heterogeneous treatment effects) individual treatment effects and program assignment are often correlated. The TPE can also deal with the common situation in which such a correlation is the result of decisions on (intended) program participation not being taken centrally. In this context RCTs are less suitable even for the simplest interventions. The TPE can be estimated by applying regression techniques to observational data from a representative sample from the targeted population. The approach is illustrated with an evaluation of a health insurance program in Vietnam.

[1]  Shaohua Chen,et al.  Are there lasting impacts of aid to poor areas , 2009 .

[2]  Stefan Dercon,et al.  When Can School Inputs Improve Test Scores? , 2004 .

[3]  M. Ravallion Evaluation in the Practice of Development , 2008 .

[4]  Dani Rodrik,et al.  The New Development Economics: We Shall Experiment, but How Shall We Learn? , 2008 .

[5]  A. T. J. Montemiranda,et al.  Reseña: Poor economics. A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. , 2011 .

[6]  J. Angrist,et al.  Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects , 1995 .

[7]  Frederico Finan,et al.  Local Electoral Incentives and Decentralized Program Performance , 2010, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[8]  Abhijit Banerjee,et al.  The Experimental Approach to Development Economics , 2008 .

[9]  James J Heckman,et al.  Understanding Instrumental Variables in Models with Essential Heterogeneity , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[10]  Glenn H. Bracht,et al.  The External Validity of Experiments1 , 1968 .

[11]  K. Mackay,et al.  IMPACT EVALUATION- THE EXPERIENCE OF THE INDEPENDENT EVALUATION GROUP OF THE WORLD BANK , 2006 .

[12]  J. Gunning,et al.  Evaluation of Development Policy: Treatment versus Program Effects , 2009 .

[13]  Martin Ravallion,et al.  Fighting Poverty One Experiment at a Time: Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty : Review Essay , 2012 .

[14]  Adam Wagstaff,et al.  Health Insurance Impacts on Health and Nonmedical Consumption in a Developing Country , 2005 .

[15]  Chris Elbers,et al.  Assessing sector-wide programs with statistical impact evaluation: A methodological proposal , 2009 .

[16]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Thinking Small: A Review of Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty , 2016 .

[17]  Angus Deaton Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development , 2010 .

[18]  Shahidur R. Khandker,et al.  The Poverty Impact of Rural Roads: Evidence from Bangladesh , 2006, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[19]  S. Dercon,et al.  Teacher Shocks and Student Learning: Evidence from Zambia , 2004 .

[20]  J. Heckman Instrumental Variables: A Study of Implicit Behavioral Assumptions Used in Making Program Evaluations. , 1997 .

[21]  E. Galasso,et al.  Jump-Starting Self-Employment? Evidence Among Welfare Participants in Argentina , 2007 .