Neural Pathway of Renovative and Innovative Products Appreciation

According to the level of change an invention makes on existing things and how it overrides people’s mental schemas on established categories, new inventions can be classified into two groups: incremental inventions (i.e., renovations), which make minor improvements on existing designs, and radical inventions (i.e., innovations), which make major developments that enable people to do things they have never been able to do before. Although innovation and renovation are two fundamentally different types of creation that feature new changes ranging from those in product development to those in large scale social changes, and people tend to report higher subjective preferences for incremental inventions compared to radical inventions, the cognitive brain mechanisms underlying the mental representation of these two types of inventions remains unknown. Through the use of innovative and renovative designs as materials, we found that relative to non-creative designs, creative (renovative &innovative) designs enhanced memory or association-related activation in the right parahippocampus. In particular, innovations evoked more activation in the conceptual pathway for representing objects than did renovations, whereas renovations evoked more activation in the motor pathway than innovations. These results suggest that operating experiences may provide advantages for understanding and appreciating creative designs.

[1]  M. Sujan,et al.  Managing Consumer Uncertainty in the Adoption of New Products: Temporal Distance and Mental Simulation , 2008 .

[2]  Nora Madjar,et al.  Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Using real-time fMRI to learn voluntary regulation of the anterior insula in the presence of threat-related stimuli. , 2012, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[4]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Tool manipulation knowledge is retrieved by way of the ventral visual object processing pathway , 2013, Cortex.

[5]  Alex Martin,et al.  A neural system for learning about object function. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Afra Wohlschläger,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Planning and Executing Actual Tool Use , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Jin Fan,et al.  Insula-amygdala functional connectivity is correlated with habituation to repeated negative images. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[8]  D. Dahl,et al.  Seeking the Ideal Level of Design Newness: Consumer Response to Radical and Incremental Product Design , 2013 .

[9]  Steve Hoeffler,et al.  Measuring Preferences for Really New Products , 2003 .

[10]  Scott H. Johnson-Frey The neural bases of complex tool use in humans , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  John G. Lynch,et al.  As Time Goes By: Do Cold Feet Follow Warm Intentions for Really New versus Incrementally New Products? , 2008 .

[12]  Shimul Melwani,et al.  The Bias Against Creativity , 2012, Psychological science.

[13]  H. Walter,et al.  The relationship between level of processing and hippocampal–cortical functional connectivity during episodic memory formation in humans , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[14]  M. Delgado,et al.  Should I buy this book? How we construct prospective value , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  JamesW. Lewis Cortical Networks Related to Human Use of Tools , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[16]  Ashesh Mukherjee,et al.  The Effect of Novel Attributes on Product Evaluation : Explaining Consumer Resistance to Technological Innovation , 2001 .

[17]  R. Clark,et al.  The medial temporal lobe. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Decomposing Product Innovativeness and Its Effects on New Product Success , 2006 .

[19]  S. Frey What Puts the How in Where? Tool Use and the Divided Visual Streams Hypothesis , 2007, Cortex.

[20]  Noa Ofen,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews , 2022 .

[21]  B. J. Hillman Only the paranoid survive. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[22]  Lauren D'Innocenzo,et al.  One Size Does Not Fit All: Managing Radical and Incremental Creativity , 2012 .

[23]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Human hippocampal processing of environmental novelty during spatial navigation , 2014, Hippocampus.

[24]  Zhiyong Yang,et al.  Consumer Adoption of New Products: Independent versus Interdependent Self-Perspectives , 2014 .

[25]  Viswanathan V Krishnan,et al.  Construing creativity: The how and why of recognizing creative ideas , 2014 .

[26]  Ashwin G Ramayya,et al.  A DTI investigation of neural substrates supporting tool use. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Scott Atran,et al.  Memory and Mystery: The Cultural Selection of Minimally Counterintuitive Narratives , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Qinglin Zhang,et al.  Neural Correlates of the Perception for Novel Objects , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  The neural basis of tool use. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  Kent Nakamoto,et al.  How do enhanced and unique features affect new product preference? The moderating role of product familiarity , 2007 .

[31]  Annabelle Blangero,et al.  Got it! Understanding the concept of a tool , 2010, NeuroImage.

[32]  P. Hekkert,et al.  'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[33]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Online evaluation of novel choices by simultaneous representation of multiple memories , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  R. Morris,et al.  Hippocampal-neocortical interactions in memory formation, consolidation, and reconsolidation. , 2010, Annual review of psychology.

[35]  Joshua M. Carlson,et al.  Feeling anxious: anticipatory amygdalo-insular response predicts the feeling of anxious anticipation. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[36]  Amanda J. Broderick,et al.  Analogies and Mental Simulations in Learning for Really New Products: The Role of Visual Attention , 2008 .

[37]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Radical and Incremental Creativity: Antecedents and Processes , 2011 .