Prospective Evaluation of a Cluster Pr o gramme for Finnish Forestry and Forest Industries

In this paper, we report a prospective evaluation process for a major research program for the Finnish forestry and forest industries. To a significant extent, this process was based on fifteen participatory workshops where tools of operational research F most notably multi-criteria methods embedded in a group support system F were deployed to help representatives from industry, the research community, and public administration in the assessment of socio-economic impacts and the identification of further research topics. Drawing upon this case study, we also analyze the preconditions, advantages, and limitations of similar kinds of participatory processes in the implementation of formative and summative evaluations.

[1]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  Identifying research priorities in public sector funding agencies: mapping science outputs on to user needs , 1998 .

[2]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Matching of technological forecasting technique to a technology , 2002 .

[3]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Embedded foresight in RTD programs , 2002 .

[4]  Denis Loveridge.  Foresight - seven paradoxes , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[5]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Incentives in technology foresight , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[6]  Harold D. Lasswell,et al.  The Policy Sciences , 1953 .

[7]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Facts or values -- how do parliamentarians and experts see nuclear power? , 1991 .

[8]  Frank Hartwich,et al.  Setting research priorities: an example from agriculture using the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[9]  Cisca Joldersma,et al.  Methodology for participatory policy analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  R. Smits.  Innovation studies in the 21st century , 2002 .

[11]  Giampiero E. G. Beroggi.  Decision Modeling in Policy Management: An Introduction to the Analytic Concepts , 1998 .

[12]  J. D. Roessner,et al.  The multiple functions of formal aids to decision making in public agencies , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  Multicriteria Methods for Technology Foresight , 2003 .

[14]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Information Is What You Make of It: The Influence of Group History and Computer Support on Information Sharing, Decision Quality, and Member Perceptions , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  P. Hertog,et al.  Innovative clusters: drivers of national innovation systems , 2001 .

[16]  Jac L. A. Geurts,et al.  Technology and society: GSS-supported participatory policy analysis , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[17]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[18]  Kerstin Cuhls,et al.  Technology foresight - Past and future , 2003 .

[19]  S. Breiner,et al.  Foresight in Science and Technology , 1996 .

[20]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  National Technology Foresight Activities Around the Globe , 1999 .

[21]  Marc D. Street.  Groupthink , 1997 .

[22]  Ruud Smits,et al.  Technology assessment and technology policy in Europe: New concepts, new goals, new infrastructures , 1995 .

[23]  Ugur Muldur,et al.  Society, the Endless Frontier: A European Vision of Research and Innovation Policies for the 21st Century , 1998 .

[24]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[25]  K. Weick.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. 2nd ed. , 1984 .

[26]  A. Prihti,et al.  Assessment of Additional Appropriation for Research , 2000 .

[27]  Thomas Reiss,et al.  Ex ante evaluation and technology assessment — two emerging elements of technology policy evaluation , 1992 .

[28]  Terttu Luukkonen,et al.  The difficulties in assessing the impact of EU framework programmes , 1998 .

[29]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment , 1995 .

[30]  Burt Perrin,et al.  How to — and How Not to — Evaluate Innovation , 2002 .

[31]  Kerstin Cuhls,et al.  Current Foresight Activities in France, Spain, and Italy , 1999 .

[32]  Ahti Salo,et al.  A group support system for foresight processes , 2004 .

[33]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[34]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  Technology foresight for wiring up the national innovation system: experiences in Britain, Australia and New Zealand , 1999 .

[35]  Harvey A. Hornstein.  Process Consultation, Volume II: Some Lessons for Managers and Consultants , 1987 .

[36]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Rationales for Government Intervention in the Commercialization of New Technologies , 2002, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..